How does the cost of equity change with lowered interest rates on the debt in the cap structure (assume all else is equal; ie not a floating rate that changes due to an decrease in the risk free rate (as this would clearly affect the CAPM formula)). BIWS claims that lowered interest rate don't affect cost of equity, but if increasing tax rates push down cost of equity (levered beta formula that gets plugged into CAPM) due to the reduced impact of the debt, then why couldn't you say the same thing about lowering the interest rates directly. Thanks
Trending Content
Career Resources
A change in the risk free rate would alter the cost of equity. Thinking about the cost of equity, it's derived from the company's ability to outperform the risk free rate based on the leverage of the company, sensitivity to market changes, and other idiosyncratic factors. If you look at the formula, increases and decreases of interest rates affect the result.
CAPM= risk free rate + levered beta*(market risk return - risk free rate)
If rates were to increase, CAPM would decrease, and vice versa.
What do you mean? If you increase interest rates, you are decreasing WACC? How is that possible?
Try for yourself and plug some numbers in:
Scenario 1: Rfr= 2, Beta= 1.5, Mr= 6
CAPM= 2+ 1.5*(6-2) = 8
Scenario 2 (rate increase): Rfr= 2.5, Beta= 1.5, Mr= 6
CAPM= 2.5+ 1.5*(6-2.5) = 7.75
If all else remains the same, CAPM decreases if rates increase. However, this isn't always the case. Market returns are susceptible to change when there are increases or decreases in rates. I just calculated this based on all other assumptions remaining constant.
I see what you got there. Now change the Beta. Use 1.0 or a Beta
Exactly - depends if Beta>1 or not
i think u mean capm would increase as well, but my point wasn’t about risk free rates—as that relationship is clear with capm. my point is say you have a fixed rate note at 5% and with a constant risk free rate it hypothetically gets swapped for say 6%. what happens to cost of equity then? biws says it would stay the same but i dont understand that if a decreasing tax rate does essentially the same thing by raising the effective cost of debt which in turn increases the cost of equity (seen with levered beta formula)
Interest rate is the absolute value while tax rate is the relative value. If I understand your point, your argument is that a higher / lower interest rate is akin to a higher / lower tax shield from a kE perspective, but it’s not. You’re getting a relative % of a value in the form of tax shield. That % is dependent on an absolute value. If your interest rate goes up or down, you’re still getting that same % nonetheless, hence why increasing or decreasing a rate is irrelevant to the cost of equity formula. If you increase or decrease tax rates, that has a direct impact into your beta due to the tax shield changing
Atque omnis id libero voluptas ipsam vel. Fugiat voluptatem velit assumenda molestias. Occaecati commodi dolorem asperiores veritatis quos perferendis expedita.
Provident qui asperiores placeat quis dolores enim omnis et. Est et libero ullam architecto in. Iste debitis accusantium omnis voluptatem quam eos quo. Voluptatum et distinctio omnis omnis omnis assumenda architecto. Praesentium inventore repudiandae aut iure impedit explicabo ut. Est quidem magni quia cupiditate omnis in. Hic enim et illo in optio aut.
Autem consequatur aut et suscipit voluptas. Beatae inventore doloribus velit non at laudantium totam. Aperiam soluta id dignissimos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...