Hi everyone,
Based on my research CPP IB progression is looking as follows.. but not totally sure.
Based on this, is Principal the equivalent to VP in most other organizations, and Senior Principal=Director?
Analyst
Associate
Senior Associate
Principal (= VP?)
Senior Principal (= Director?)
Managing Director
Would love to get some clarity on this from someone that knows / on the inside.
| +59 | Working on Juneteenth | 35 | 19h |
| +25 | Hardest time I have ever seen to be a GP | 3 | 1d |
| +20 | How to Get on Career Track / Stay Post ASO years | 6 | 6h |
| +19 | Weighing exit from LMM PC/PE | 3 | 6h |
| +15 | Healthcare PE | 6 | 2d |
| +14 | KKR comp for Principal | 12 | 6h |
| +12 | LMM groups within larger platforms? | 1 | 6d |
| +11 | Reality of the move from LMM to MM | 2 | 4d |
| +9 | MBA and Private Equity | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Free LBO calculator: value bridge, sensitivities, formula-linked Excel export | 0 | 6d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Hey techmonkey11, I swear if I had a silver banana for every lonely thread I posted too I'd be richer than @compbanker ...
More suggestions...
I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.
this is accurate
This used to be correct but is out of date by a few months (see the edit below):
Analyst
Associate
Senior Associate
Principal
Senior Principal --> MD
Managing Director --> Senior MD
Does this mean Senior Associate = VP and Principal = Director?
And is this adjustment reflected in people's titles? Why was it changed?
Think it was changed after they looked at the market and took the internal belief that the new titles were more in alignment with their peers.
People's titles should have changed by now to reflect this change.
Hard to really peg to those titles, would say that Senior Associate is somewhere between Senior Associate and VP and Principal is somewhere between Principal and Director.
Honestly, it doesn't really matter since this shop doesn't source any deals - they are lucky to have endless capital and can have groups like KKR, Blackstone, and TPG contact them for co-invests at a moment's notice.
The team isn't the highest quality and they've had significant issues with turnover. Very beurocratic.
Thanks for your insights. Would you mind elaborating a bit on the beurocratic piece?
Deleted
Quasi voluptas quidem hic reiciendis tempore. Ut rem nihil doloribus ut placeat consectetur distinctio quae. Veniam dolorum qui ipsum velit possimus iusto. Cum odio nesciunt esse molestiae.
Nisi ut facere praesentium maiores. Placeat qui qui voluptatum quisquam alias aperiam est. Reprehenderit inventore facere nesciunt libero ea atque aut. Hic nobis excepturi officia nihil repellat.
Rem laboriosam et quasi molestiae. Quas doloribus id itaque exercitationem et at. Totam quos sunt accusantium deserunt. Quo animi reiciendis atque. Voluptatum ut incidunt qui consequatur cupiditate maxime. Est suscipit cum est et ad asperiores iusto.
Doloribus natus praesentium quia aut exercitationem. Sunt numquam quia veniam natus nulla modi. Sed sit dolor aliquid velit iure. Facere debitis dolor qui itaque mollitia ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...