Dumb Question But...

What makes certain groups more prestigious than others besides brand name? Is it the their deal flow?

For Ex:
Comparing Lazard’s NYC M&A group to Moelis’s NYC M&A group.

This sound obvious to a lot but I literally have no idea.

 
Most Helpful
  • Deal flow and the calibre of clients you bring in. If Bank A does HC but doesn't get called on by any of the top 20 pharma companies whilst Bank B's HC team does, you could probably say Bank B's HC team is more "prestigious". This also applies within the firm - if your HC team gets all the top 10 pharma companies but your O&G team only get's mid-cap O&G companies, the former could be seen as more "prestigious".
 

Yes its largely deal flow.

Deal flow is important because its what builds your experience, which is really what you're looking for in the overall IB game. You give them 2 years of your life, they give you some money, that's not a great trade on its own. It becomes a great trade if they can also teach you a lot and leave you well prepared for other opportunities down the road.

Better groups offer better deal flow by way of (i) a better ratio of live deals to pitches and (ii) when market deal volume is thin, better groups are still getting some deal flow while weaker groups are not.

Better groups may also have somewhat stronger connections to PE clients and thus a slightly stronger pipeline to PE, but I would call that a smaller advantage because the PE firms still want the best overall people and are thus motivated to look beyond simply the banking groups they know best.

FYI, you say Lazard M&A and Moelis M&A but the boutiques are already all M&A (aside from restructuring) so the groups are really the industry teams within M&A. It would be Lazard Energy vs. Moelis Energy, for example.

 

Ut et nihil consequuntur vel velit quia quia. Iste doloribus autem quia doloribus voluptatum debitis. Et non debitis fuga ipsam ut odio qui incidunt. Dolor itaque quod dolorum in error itaque minus ipsum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”