Enterprise Value Bridge Negotiations - Why?

Hi all,

Even though I have gained experience in this field in the past, I am still wondering why there are negotiations and discussions around the enterprise value in a M&A process.

Let's consider a hypothetical example: Buyer X and buyer Y are bidding on target T.

During the bidding phase, buyer X submits an enterprise value of $60MM and assumes $10MM pension liabilities and $10MM net financial debt, finally arriving at an equity valuation of $40MM. Buyer Y in turn bids $50MM but only assumes $10MM net financial debt (implying also an equity value of $40MM).

Both parties are now in-line with their equity valuation. The proceeds that the current owner of T would get are the same.

  1. Why does it even matter in a M&A process to submit how one arrived at a certain equity value? I.e. why don't you simply submit the sole equity value?
  2. Why are there discussions and negotiations around certain items in the bridge? For example one could assume $10MM pension liabilities and another bidder $15MM due to different assumptions. Why does it matter to discuss these items with the seller?

It would be amazing if someone could clarify this.

Many thanks!

 
Most Helpful

Buyers and sellers have different objectives as you might very well imagine. This, together with the fact that signing of the deal and closing of the deal often are several months apart also have a great deal of why sellers want bidders to submit their EV-to-equity vallue adjustments.

As a buyer, ideally, I would want to classify as many items as possible as "debt-like" and so this will reduce the actual equity I get to pay. Also you have to note that net debt and pensions are not the only things that get addressed in the bridge - many working capital items are explicitly discussed as well during closing accounts to decide what is debt-like or not.

In the grand scheme of things, 2-3mm dollars worth of adjustments doesn't seem to be a big deal in a $5bn dollar transaction, but as a banker, if you're able to help your client win that amount, you can bet that they will pay you back in kind in your incentive fees.

 

Thank you very much, this makes perfect sense!

However, one could still argue that in the end, the seller only cares about the equity value proceeds. I get your point that it makes sense to push the price down by classifying as many items as possible. Why are initial bids always based on the EV? Is it easier to compare different bids on a EV basis or are there other stakeholders who might have an interested?

 

I mean imagine if a sponsor A is selling this corporate to sponsor B, and in between the equity bid - call it $1Bn of equity and the full sale, sponsor A does a dividend recap for $500m. In that case if the bud was based on equity value then sponsor B would over pay by $500m. And Sponsor A walks away $500m richer than he should.

On an EV basis whatever the Capital Structure is, no one is better of worse off.

 

Dignissimos officiis quibusdam neque quo sed non. Doloremque cum consequatur id eum assumenda fugit. Est at asperiores culpa sunt molestias tempore. Ratione similique sed commodi dolorum eveniet.

Velit est quasi sit doloremque sit. Molestiae quo quidem ut. Qui quaerat voluptas ipsum qui.

Dolor eos id accusantium. Rerum hic sequi officiis ipsa aut hic voluptas amet. Qui eum odio et expedita.

Impedit quasi est quas. Eligendi sit et enim laboriosam corporis ab. Atque ab nulla incidunt rem ipsum vitae facere. Eos vero explicabo iste amet recusandae tempora. Odit aut odio qui similique.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”