Excellent place to start a career. You will learn the ropes and get reps in modeling which is exactly what you need as a first job. Very recognizable in the industry too when you decide to exit after a few years assuming you do.

 

I know as a prospect it is easy to see the allure of firms like Blackstone, but in reality, there is not much reason to actually worship these firms over other serious institutional shops. Even worse, to think that one somehow "failed" by not getting employed at one.... 

Trust me, you will laugh at this thought after a few years in the industry. Crow Holdings is a top flight place to work... as in more analyst/associates at the BX's of the world apply for jobs at the Crow Holdings of the world than vice versa, think about that!  

 

@redever why do you say more analyst associates at BX of the world apply to Crow versus the other way around ?

 

Thanks for the insight prospective monkey.  I am sure that your professional experience working with both of these groups has led you to this conclusion.  I for one have purchased deals from both Blackstone and Crow Holdings, and personally know people at both firms.  Both groups have world class people/professionals. 

With that said, I haven't been in Blackstone's HQ, but I have a hard time imagining that it is cooler than Crow Holdings' office.  The art in that place would rival any major art museum in the World.  I counted 3 Rembrandts hanging on the walls during my tour.  Also, no way that Blackstone has a Pig Room.

https://www.dallasnews.com/business/real-estate/2018/01/26/pig-room-deb…

 

I find it to be a great place as well, but I can't get over the fact that I still am not able to land something at a top 10 shop. As redever said, I'll probably realize once I get into the workplace.

 

a top 10 shop. 

What does this even refer to? 

Where is the universally accepted and agreed upon "real estate top 10" outside of individual 19 year olds on WSO? 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

Being fair, I’d say real estate top 5-10 is relatively understood and standard. Hines, blackstone, Starwood, Tishman, related. There’s 5 already. Is crow Holdings among one of the standard top 5-10 that comes to your mind? For me, yes and no.

 
Most Helpful

I’m in college like yourself, so do take what i say with a grain of salt. 
 

Working at smaller, hell even unknown firm can have its benefits. Like a shop that’s still in the early stages, if you get in early and the shop is successful it can pay big dividends down the line. Don’t discount the fact that you’ll be a big fish in small pond, much easier to stand out and move up. Also you might not get siloed and be exposed to the whole deal process across multiple deals. Plenty of other reasons as well. Like others said don’t be so fixated on top 10, there is so much opportunity out there and firms doing really cool stuff and  you’ve never heard of them. Yes there are downsides, no brand name, less ‘prestigious’ and may be less efficient. But don’t discount the above.

 

At least you won't have to worry about finding a place to live in NYC.  Mass exodus from the city from chatter from my friends in the boroughs.

"Who am I? I'm the guy that does his job. You must be the other guy."
 

MonkeyWrench

At least you won't have to worry about finding a place to live in NYC.  Mass exodus from the city from chatter from my friends in the boroughs.

It's been pretty overstated.  I think a lot of folks who were probably on the way out in the next 2-5 years have moved up their timetables.  Other than that, you're already seeing people coming back into the city.  It's not like the city doesn't see an exodus every July/August of people heading out to the beach or upstate.

 

MonkeyWrench

I mean, half a million people doesn't seem like a normal seasonal shift to me...

But 100,000?  200,000?  Very possible.

The point is that the statistic that 450,000 people or whatever that have left NYC isn't taking into account the fact that every summer people leave NYC.  Look, a net exodus of even a quarter million people from the city is enormous, no doubt.  But it goes without saying it paints a much different picture than 450,000.  New York is a pretty transient place, I'd bet tens of thousands of people move out every year, if not more.  We'll see whether or not those folks get replaced.

 

Fair enough, but I personally know of 6 individuals and/or couples that just moved out that would never have considered doing so before all this.  And they moved far, not like outside of the city limits but out of the state (not across the NJ/NY/CT lines).  Realize this is anecdotal, but willing to wager I'm not the only one with that type of phenomenon in my sphere.

Plus - even if you net out 250K for seasonal adjustment, that's still an additional quarter of a million people (a lot of them higher end taxpayers) that likely aren't coming back.  I don't think Cuomo would have addressed it publicly if he didn't think it was at least worth paying attention to/somewhat credible.  I don't trust anything DeBlasio says so I'm not going to opine on his view at all.

"Who am I? I'm the guy that does his job. You must be the other guy."
 

MonkeyWrench

Fair enough, but I personally know of 6 individuals and/or couples that just moved out that would never have considered doing so before all this.  And they moved far, not like outside of the city limits but out of the state (not across the NJ/NY/CT lines).  Realize this is anecdotal, but willing to wager I'm not the only one with that type of phenomenon in my sphere.

I guess... but you think these friends of yours were intending to stay in the tri-state area full time, and yet very quickly jumped ship to a totally different part of the country.  That really doesn't track, at all.  Anyone moving to, say, Texas, just wasn't planning on being in NYC for the long haul.

And yes, I agree 250k is a lot of people.  It's also ~50% of what people are screaming bloody murder when they talk about total people gone.  Lets see what happens this time next year.  If NYC is sitting at 5% less population I will eat my words, and that'll be the least of anyone's problems.

 

One of them would probably have moved in the next 3 years, I'll give you that.  But the others didn't have any plans of leaving anytime soon.  

"Who am I? I'm the guy that does his job. You must be the other guy."
 

Have you seen Midtown lately?

I know 10 people personally who left. Not all were going to stay forever, but 2 out of the 10 were basically NYC lifers. 

I am long on NYC, but I don’t think the recovery is going to be as fast as some of the RE firms and talking heads out there are trying to make us believe. The city may be in a long road to recovery, but you can never count it out.

 

Have you seen Midtown lately?

I know 10 people personally who left. Not all were going to stay forever, but 2 out of the 10 were basically NYC lifers. 

By definition they aren't lifers.

I am long on NYC, but I don’t think the recovery is going to be as fast as some of the RE firms and talking heads out there are trying to make us believe. The city may be in a long road to recovery, but you can never count it out.

Look, it's this simple.  Urban areas in general are going to take a big hit.  What I want to know is why anyone thinks NYC is in a worse spot than Houston or Atlanta or anything like that.

Anyone making the case that the city is in for a rough few years... well, no argument from me.  But I'd argue that a lot of cities are in for some tight times.  It's a question of whether you think something has fundamentally changed in NYC that hasn't elsewhere, or not.  

There is also a big difference in what "recovery" means.  From a real estate perspective, the fact that a large number of high-earning people are leaving means another blow to an already oversupplied luxury condo/rental market.  But in a more holistic sense, the only danger to NYC (to my mind) is the financial services industry leaving en masse.  Short of that, I don't see a fundamental change in the city's future.  Sure, there will be some belt tightening at the municipal level, is my guess, but we're only ~6 years out (at most) from SALT coming back, which will help from a tax perspective, and the job base is diverse enough that the city should be okay.  You need to have a lot of things go wrong for New York for it to hit the kind of death spiral which spells long term disaster - as long as the jobs are here, young people will want to come, and as long as that happens, the jobs will stay.

 

can anyone comment on the culture at crow holdings, the growth opportunities, what they look for, etc? 

 

There are a ton of responses already, but incase you haven't quite gotten the gist of it:

Top-tier firm, savvy investors at the property level. Have transacted with them and met several members of the acq team in various property types/strategies, the depth of knowledge is immediately apparent and reputation well earned. Great combo of capital and investment prowess

 

"HaS aNyOnE hEaRd Of CrOw HoLdInGs?" that's what you sound like OP

Quant (ˈkwänt) n: An expert, someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing.
 

Have done a few deals w/ them.

Very bright. They "get it". Have high conviction ideas which they operate within. If the deal is within that box and there is trust then it is smooth. No so easy in other cases.

There are two types of LPS - those that do their HW and know exactly what they want and those that do some HW and wait to dig in until the deal is on the desk. No issue with either... but Crow is the former. I'd imagine it to be a pretty intellectually stimulating environment.

PM me if you want to discuss

PS - did not read most of the thread.. seems trolly 

 

have an upcoming interview with them. anyone know where I can learn more about their funds? can't find too much info on their website.

 

any suggestions on this vs. heitman. For full time analyst? Not too interested in either one of these markets long term, but its what I have in hand. 

 

Clearly, a placement at either is great. That said, Heitman is a very well regarded top brand name in the real estate investment management business, global presence, and would be a great place to start a career. A place like Crow could be the exit vector, especially with a promotion attached. That said, if you did like Crow's operation/location, etc. I would seriously consider it. If you are really thinking from a pure "exit ops" stand point, Heitman is a winner by a mile. 

 

Really good firm out of undergrad in terms of value and experience. And sure crow is the "exit op" in the sense they are investors and always have people who join from advisory roles. I'm sure one could argue SNL developers are exit ops too. But IMO there are way more people parlaying crow experience (especially analyst level) and leaving for other opportunities than vice versa.

 

Nobody who is actually in the midst of a successful career thinks in terms of "Exit Ops"... that's for interns and undergrads. 

Once you are in your career... you think in terms of promotions and progress and results. If someone actually gets a job at "Crow Holdings" to "leverage" it, they are sorta missing the point. 

In fairness... I don't think you meant something so far off.. just how you framed it. I say this because pretty much EVERY "analyst" program no matter where it is may require or lead to better outcomes via a jump. Clearly, some firms want you to stay, but a lot expressly don't (no clue where Crow fits, I have zero idea about its "analyst program" in particular). 

 

Non harum voluptas officia saepe. Veniam eum nobis et eum tempora in et aut. At in omnis numquam voluptatem dolores.

 

Facilis laboriosam ut quos eveniet et in. Minima id et blanditiis dolorem omnis vero. Libero enim earum autem. Molestias et veritatis et. Eveniet aliquam tenetur voluptatem veniam.

Iusto ducimus asperiores molestiae voluptas explicabo est. Natus ducimus pariatur velit quia recusandae reiciendis quibusdam eaque. Iusto quia sequi animi voluptas doloremque repellat accusantium incidunt. Aut corrupti est a earum ut nobis id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (89) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”