HBO's "Silicon Valley" - Predictions and Implications

I'm pretty excited for the premiere of "Silicon Valley" on Sunday. Mike Judge usually makes some wicked and shrewd stuff, and I think this has the potential to illuminate some of the absurdity of the Valley. It could have the same crushing effect that "Office Space" had on the Crapplebee's franchise.

I've lived in the area on and off for the past six years, and as a non-tech person, the pretentiousness and idol-worship of the place is enough to make me cringe. So I wonder, what are the likely implications of the show? For the sake of this thought experiment, let's assume the show becomes widely watched and has the potential to shape public opinion over the course of a few seasons...

Here's a few possibilities:

1) Exposes start-up kids as socially inept nerds, lessening the "allure" of Silicon Valley
2) It becomes passe to want to start a software company, much like grunge rock displaced the glams. Smart kids will instead want to go build drones or master new agricultural yield maximization techniques.
3) Those who do have the entrepreneurial instinct opt to start their ventures elsewhere, rather than be associated with SV stereotype. They'll start businesses in places like Austin, Portland, Boulder, Raleigh etc.
4) VC's lose their sense of awe for start-up kids, valuations of pre-revenue companies come way down.
5) Social media bubble rolls over: FB, TWTR, KING shares collapse under their valuations
6) Real estate prices in Silicon Valley retreat
7) I finally buy a house

Seems pretty likely to me... time to short the Q's...

Alternatively, I guess it could have exactly the opposite effect...

 
jankynoname:
4) VC's lose their sense of awe for start-up kids, valuations of pre-revenue companies come way down.
5) Social media bubble rolls over: FB, TWTR, KING shares collapse under their valuations

Sorry, but are you serious? You think that a TV show on HBO is going to cause VCs to rethink investments in startups? You're out of your mind if you think this. VCs' entire job is to meet and evaluate these companies, and you think that a TV show by Mike Judge is going to change their perception in the slightest?

 

Haha, obv being a bit flip, but I'm sorta serious. VC's are subject to the same behavioral biases as any other investor, and certainly fall victim to the 'greater fool' style of investing. To the extent that they lose faith that there is a greater fool out there, they'll definitely have to tighten up.

If you don't think media outlets have the ability to affect public/investor perception I think you need to check again... Most likely the show just flops like Newsroom, but I'm just thinking of the high impact case...

 
Best Response

Yeah, pretty much this... This show is not going to bring about revolutionary change in the tech space. It is going to be a comedy that pokes lighthearted fun at nerds while still allowing people to cheer for the underdog. I will expect some funny dialogue and a good bit of humor at the expense of nerd stereotypes, but your perception of the impact this show will have is absolutely ludicrous. Marc Andreesen is not all of a sudden going to be like "whoa, we are like giving these guys way too much credit for unattainable value... How did we not realize this oversight before? Thanks HBO." These delusions of grandeur are the type of thing that Sorkin aspires to out of his shows but falls on his face due overutilization of banter and clever rhetoric for rhetoric's sake. At the end of the day, if a show like House of Cards (which is infinitely more brilliant and more well-cast than either Newsroom or SV will hope to be) is unable to even bat an eyelash at the corruption that takes place in politics, this show has no prayer of exacting any impact on the start-up world. Don't forget to consider the audience... Most people watching these shows won't be intelligent enough or plugged in enough to have any influence anyway, and the ones who are (arguably many on this forum like myself), will be apathetic as they understand that market dynamics unfold organically as they are meant to.

 

Eaque voluptas dolores autem dolorum odio sed. Qui ea sit tempora voluptatem id ut cum. Odit magni quos repudiandae voluptatem.

A repellat corporis et reiciendis ea doloremque et. Deserunt hic maxime reprehenderit id vero. Vitae commodi debitis error blanditiis et explicabo.

In dignissimos accusantium fugit eum facere et ipsa. Tenetur facere consequatur qui. Ducimus molestiae quidem sit quidem. Sit qui rerum repellat culpa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”