How do Banks look at your resume?
I was just wondering if any of you previous analysts/associates had any insight into how I-Banks look at resumes. I had always thought that HR would look at resumes, but after doing some research online, it looks as if analysts are the ones that do the first round screening. This came as a big surprise to me.
Is it true that only alumni from your school at whatever bank you're applying for will look at your resume for the first round? How true is this?
Also, Is it the same process amongst different divisions, such as I-Banks, AM, Ops, Trading, Risk? I read a article on mergers and inquisitions, and when they said that analysts rather than HR look at your resumes, they were specifically referring only to IBD.
Yeah, I'm kind of interested as well
Bump
I'm not sure how BBs in NY/London do it, but in the MENA region its handled by HR first. They screen the applicants and then the concerned department gets to work with the applicant.
We used to break it up by school and by division. Students would drop their resumes for our division (or multiple divisions, which happened a lot). Back in 2005, I was a VP and the team lead for a target school. We would get something like 150-200 resumes from that school. Here's how we did it, I can't vouch that every place did it the same way.
HR would give us every resume from that school. I asked everybody on the team to review the resumes and rank everyone as a 1, 2, or 3. 1 was someone who you definitely thought should get a first round, 2 was a maybe, and 3 was a no. We would have a meeting with the team and the recruiters (HR). We would whittle the list down to about 15-20 that would get first round interviews.
Usually, you could eliminate a lot of people who were 3's right off the bat. There were probably about 10 that were absolute must interviews. Then you spent the bulk of the time screening about 40 people for 10 slots.
Our recruiting team included me, a couple of Associates, and a couple of Analysts. About half of which were alumni of the school. The team was required to attend all events we held at the school. Sometimes, students who made a good impression at these events were put in the "1" pile. Especially if they asked good follow-up questions or started a dialogue with someone on the team after the event. Also, there were some students that made terrible impressions and were put into the "3" pile.
By the way, the senior recruiters or HR people were all former front office people with MBAs from top schools. Their opinions were valued heavily by us.
The person who did the first rounds pretty much had control over who made it to the second round, since they were the only person there. The thing that sucks for students is that every interviewer looks for somewhat different things in candidates and that person may or may not like you, when if it was a different interviewer at the same firm, you may have had different results.
We took recruiting very seriously. When it came to deciding what groups the analysts went into, I had better insight as to who were the absolute best, could persuade the analyst to join our group, and had some sway with HR to get the people we wanted.
That's the bulk of how it happened at our firm.
In the second rounds, every student had 5 interviews, with one or two people. The second rounds were conducted by the team leaders from the various schools and maybe one associate from each team. People ranked the students on multiple categories, something like this: analytical ability, leadership, interpersonal skills, integrity, maturity, etc. the idea was that someone should be at least pretty good in everything and particularly good in at least one thing.
Once again, you would have people you fought for, made sure were excluded, while the rest were on the fence and required the most discussion. If the interviewer you had in the first or second round was obnoxiously opinionated, that would help you a lot, if they liked you.
Let's say I am the applicant applying for a particular division. I have a friend (school alumnus), let's say a VP at another division, but of course at the same firm. This VP from another division asks you to specifically look at my resume; other words, he put in good words for me. Could this VP pull in any weight in final decision or the better question would be.. how much weight in decision can this VP connection pull in for me? Would this only work for a guaranteed first round interview?
If you could answer these questions, I would greatly appreciate it.
right....
This is not the case in my personal experience, although I agree with most everything else you said. I found the HR recruiting team to be completely useless at both BBs I worked for. The senior recruiters were usually current bankers/traders.
Let me clarify, there were something like 8 women (yes, all women) in recruiting/training. Two director level were very solid. Worked in banking and equity research previously and went to top schools in both undergrad and MBA. We respected their opinions. The other 6 never really had opinions and rightfully so, based on their backgrounds, which were significantly different than the two more senior ones.
Very helpful! Hey, this can be added to your blog, if you still consider it.
Thanks a lot Sir. Very helpful information. How are you guys getting these resumes though? Are they coming from the schools career services, or are they coming from online applications and later on sorted out by school.
How do Investment Banks look at your resume? (Originally Posted: 07/21/2012)
I was just wondering if any of you previous analysts/associates had any insight into how I-Banks look at resumes. I had always thought that HR would look at resumes, but after doing some research online, it looks as if analysts are the ones that do the first round screening. This came as a big surprise to me.
Is it true that only alumni from your school at whatever bank you're applying for will look at your resume for the first round? How true is this?
Also, Is it the same process amongst different divisions, such as I-Banks, AM, Ops, Trading, Risk? I read a article on mergers and inquisitions, and when they said that analysts rather than HR look at your resumes, they were specifically referring only to IBD.
I don't work there anymore, this was a while ago. All I know is that HR got a huge PDF file from the school. I assume they got it from career services or equivalent.
In the modern age they've started to use computers.
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/ug-recruiting-part-i-how-a-resume…
When a really bad resume comes across my desk, I usually call over my MD and anyone else around and we all have a good laugh at it. If you want to not have that happen to you, all you have to do is format properly, proofread 1,000x, not obviously overexaggerate your work experience and put have any weird interests on there.
Our analysts were tasked with scanning resumes. Imagine it being 1a and you still have 3 more things to do before getting a chance to sleep for 3hrs and you get a pile of 100 resumes on your desk. The analysts would give the minimal amount of time on each one.
Eum nihil aut temporibus. Eligendi vitae sit consectetur similique. Sit deserunt ut quaerat vel corrupti facere unde omnis. Accusamus sequi eligendi similique commodi qui eaque.
Vel omnis saepe debitis sunt sit quo numquam. Consequatur iure provident veritatis qui dolorem. Natus expedita ipsa et animi rerum laboriosam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...