How do you model an earn-out in an LBO model?

I'm trying to model an LBO where I am the buyer and am offering to pay 8x $100M LTM EBITDA, but 5x up-front, with the rest paid over 3 years as revenue targets are hit. How do you do this on the model (I'm asking about the concept, not the mechanics of how much they get)?

I'm thinking it should probably be on sources & uses, get put onto the company's balance (even though this is money "I" am paying out of "my" pocket in future years), and then get put into the cash flow statement? But I really don't know. This wasn't in any course I took.

I'm really lost.

 
Best Response

You'd have the earnout as a contingent liability on the balance sheet, and as targets are met, you would build into the model the payout and corresponding decrease in the contingent liability. The contingent liability would need to be placed on the books at fair market value and re-evaluated at every reporting period. Those changes would flow through the income statement as a gain/loss.

You would need the specific terms of the agreement to properly model it, though.

I guess the easiest way to think of it as a zero interest cash flow sweep loan, with the terms of the cash flow sweep being the terms of the earnout. The only difference of course is that it has to be evaluated to fair market value in each reporting period. I don't know if this helps at all.

 

That really helps. Thank you @Khayembii. When and how do I pay it though? Do I buy this company as if the EV is the whole $800M right away, but the equity holders only get cashed out as if it was $500M, so then the $300M contingent liability gets booked, and my $300M just sits there?

I'm lost on that part. Of course I don't want the earn-out to leave my pocket until it's earned, so how does that get reflected?

Thank you!!

 

He discussed how you model it. You need to reread his post.

Earnouts are structured where mgmt (and/or prior ownership) gets paid based on hitting targets (generally EBITDA, but could be something else). So, create a simple if statement that reads, if EBITDA is greater or equal to X, Y% of the earnout is paid out to the mgmt/sellers. Do this for each year until you burn out the $300mm.

Typically, these agreements only last ~3 years, though you could model it out to 5.

 

That really helps. Thank you @Khayembii. When and how do I pay it though? Do I buy this company as if the EV is the whole $800M right away, but the equity holders only get cashed out as if it was $500M, so then the $300M contingent liability gets booked, and my $300M just sits there?

I'm lost on that part. Of course I don't want the earn-out to leave my pocket until it's earned, so how does that get reflected?

Thank you!!

 

Not necessarily. Depends how you fund it. If you raise debt or fund the earn out off a revolver for example, you trade that liability. maybe you generate some cash and fund the earn out that way too.

Worth noting, if it's a material earn out, be sure to get your taxes right. I.e. if allocating to goodwill, you amortize the earn-out over the remaining 15 yrs from when you did the initial deal. So if you do a deal and don't pay earnout for another two years, typically you amortize that earn-out for tax purposes over 13 years.

 

I'm confused here about where the cash comes from for the earn-out. So they hypothetically sell 80% of the equity to me for $400M up-front, and we agree that I will pay them another $240M in 3 years if the company hits its targets. I just want to make sure to understand what happens next and why.

The fact that I said I will pay them the $240M is irrelevant, right? The cash isn't going to come from my pocket, it's going to come from the company's cash flows, i.e., the 20% that they still own is going to lose some value to fund the earn-out payment. Does that sound correct?

If so, you book a contingent liability on the balance sheet. So on day one, in the case of the sources & uses above, the new equity account would be 20.6+20+52.5-transactioncosts. But then you book the 20.6 contingent liability as well, reducing the equity account by 20.6. Does that all sound right?

And then when you finally pay it, the company simply pays it, reducing the liability and cash. Unless they didn't hit the targets, in which case you simply write off the liability and book a gain to increase the equity account by the amount you wrote off.

Where did I miss?

 
powpow:

I'm confused here about where the cash comes from for the earn-out. So they hypothetically sell 80% of the equity to me for $400M up-front, and we agree that I will pay them another $240M in 3 years if the company hits its targets. I just want to make sure to understand what happens next and why.

The fact that I said I will pay them the $240M is irrelevant, right? The cash isn't going to come from my pocket, it's going to come from the company's cash flows, i.e., the 20% that they still own is going to lose some value to fund the earn-out payment. Does that sound correct?

Yes, but of course the buyer doesn't say that "they" will pay the earnout, they say the Company will. So you'd sell the company for $400mm plus the fair value of the earn out at close. Technically the buyer and seller aren't agreeing on a purchase price due to the contingent liability, however the earn out would be valued in this theoretical purchase price at fair value. So the liability would be recognized on the opening balance sheet.

If so, you book a contingent liability on the balance sheet. So on day one, in the case of the sources & uses above, the new equity account would be 20.6+20+52.5-transactioncosts. But then you book the 20.6 contingent liability as well, reducing the equity account by 20.6. Does that all sound right?

Why are you including the earn out in equity initially? The opening balance sheet would have it as a liability so it wouldn't be in the equity account.

And then when you finally pay it, the company simply pays it, reducing the liability and cash. Unless they didn't hit the targets, in which case you simply write off the liability and book a gain to increase the equity account by the amount you wrote off.

AFAIK this is correct, assuming it's funded off cash as the other poster said above.

 

Hmm, well, in real estate, an earnout is when the lender has agreed to give the borrower more loan dollars if the borrower meets certain conditions. For example, a lender might issue a $2 million loan with an earnout of $500,000 (additional debt capital) if occupancy is rasied from 88% to 95%. I would assume in your case that this means a firm or company can acquire more capital if it meets certain criteria.

Array
 

An Earn-Out is a provision whereby the buyer agrees to pay a base price but this does not reflect the full value the seller believes the business to be worth. However, in the future, the buyer promises to pay additional consideration up to that full value if pre-negotiated financial milestones are achieved in the future.

So, as an over-simplified example, Seller wants to sell Business X for $100M, Buyer only wants to purchase for $75M because he is unsure if Business X is truly worth $100M. If they agree to an earn-out, Buyer will purchase it for $75M but promises to pay Seller an extra $25M if, in running Business X over the next year or so, certain finanical targets are met.

So, "assume earnouts of $XX going forward" I believe, means, that assume the pre-negotiated financial targets are met and that the buyer will pay the seller the additional consideration.

 

Tempore aut aut eaque consequuntur aut provident totam. Magni dolorem et natus molestiae qui enim quo. Dolores quis eius autem saepe. Vel atque qui eos sapiente modi atque. Officiis commodi ipsa quaerat ut quis. Soluta adipisci culpa ut.

Officia ducimus atque ut et accusamus amet nisi. Et dignissimos excepturi sint modi error modi error. Non ipsum perspiciatis recusandae est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”