Not sure if a usual practice but a quant equity fund just asked for the signals data frame that my model generated on their time series data.. they need to check the signals to "better see how to trade them later". They can surely backward engineer the signals from the signals dataset..i have a few systems and can feed them one system for testing.. so as to get employed. what should I do?
| Best Public Markets Gig? ER, MM HF, SM HF, or LO AM? | 13 | 2d | ||
| +42 | How to start a family office (HF rainmaker) | 17 | 21h | |
| +34 | Law to Quant Pivot? | 10 | 1d | |
| +20 | How to destress at Pod HF? | 8 | 2h | |
| +19 | Hedge Fund WLB | 6 | 19h | |
| +19 | People who work at hedge funds, what made you interested initially? | 13 | 7h | |
| +19 | HF Final Round Interview | 4 | 4d | |
| +17 | Most appealing public credit seats out of RX? | 1 | 4d | |
| +16 | good fundamentals, bad chart | 8 | 1d | |
| +16 | Which Funds focus on timing the broad market rather than L/S individual equities? | 10 | 10h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I'm just sitting here absolutely fascinated and laughing at the thought that someone would even think to come up with the term "brain rape" to describe what you're talking about.
it's bad practice and sends a bad message about the firm. it's not unusual that quant firms will try to pull information from candidates like that.
Hard pass. Massive red flags going off in my head.
Thank you.. can you please elaborate?
Was this a case study they asked you to work on like a "How would you approach this scenario"? The way I read it, it came across as them asking you to do their work for them (first red flag). You also pointed out that they should be competent enough to backwards engineer your results to within a certain degree of accuracy. So why can't they? Or simply ask you to walk through your thought process while not having you hand over final code (another red flag)? Regardless, don't feed them any of your already built systems, that's your IP and you don't need to give them viable (potentially profitable) work product just to try and get a job in the first place (last red flag).
Tell them to fuck off
Does the fund's name start with S by any chance?
Real ones know the fuckery that goes on in their interview process
Thank you for support! The funds name is not known to me yet as this is a startup fund... but they are already trading
That’s absurd. Why would you give them that info? They want it, they can hire you. They aren’t sure if you created a “good” thing and they want to understand it better? Come up with a different interview process. Either way, it IS NOT something I would do and have not seen this in the industry.
Besides this they are offering a pure pnl based comp with no base
Asperiores ut qui repellendus commodi alias sint. Consequuntur mollitia inventore et molestiae a. Officia minus esse omnis voluptas exercitationem. Necessitatibus quaerat voluptas ad ea expedita possimus quos. Iste animi quibusdam laborum et qui explicabo voluptatem architecto.
Cupiditate ex excepturi ut iure. Aperiam sed doloremque reprehenderit aut aut omnis. Nulla molestias et doloribus. Quia quos ut excepturi aspernatur voluptatibus fuga consectetur.
Nobis ut aut tempore sed ut placeat et. Officiis sit quibusdam velit dolor. Reiciendis inventore asperiores omnis nihil nemo. Labore deserunt esse pariatur corporis consequatur. Dignissimos est atque ipsam similique porro iste.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...