LinkedIn Restriction?

This morning, I found out that I got banned by LinkedIn to send invitations without providing emails. It says that some recipients have claimed that they don't know me and the number of them has reached the threshold. I already removed the restriction by declaring that I understand the policy. Has this happened to anyone before? Can I do remove the restriction for unlimited times?

EDIT:
I really wasn't sure why people here started scolding me for cold inviting others. I started the thread to ask if someone here has been in the same situation and how she/he dealt with it. Looking at the comments, some people mistakenly made the assumption that I sent invitations to strangers with the default message. It just shows that some WSO users never read the original post and base their understanding of a thread on the comments of others.

 
John D. Peckerson:

I'm with hhodik on this one.. Man the people that cold invite me on linkedin really surprise me. Sometimes there is not even a message in the invite other than the standard one. Sure enough, every time they have invited also at least one colleague or friend.

Usually I just shake my head and ignore them.

Isn't that part of the whole purpose of networking? How are students, undergrad/MBA/etc, supposed to make connections in a field they have yet to break into? Other than career fairs and the like, what would you propose they do, when the conventional wisdom is to cast as wide a net as possible?
"Now go get your f'n shinebox!"
 
JimmyDnFFX:
John D. Peckerson:

I'm with hhodik on this one.. Man the people that cold invite me on linkedin really surprise me. Sometimes there is not even a message in the invite other than the standard one. Sure enough, every time they have invited also at least one colleague or friend.

Usually I just shake my head and ignore them.

Isn't that part of the whole purpose of networking? How are students, undergrad/MBA/etc, supposed to make connections in a field they have yet to break into? Other than career fairs and the like, what would you propose they do, when the conventional wisdom is to cast as wide a net as possible?

cold invite someone without a short personal text is not networking. If you two are from same school, say that in invitation. if you used to work in same company, say that too. if you have same certificate/volunteer or even major in college, you can mention that. Try to find some common things between you two.

generally I think it is a bad idea to network with someone with no common things. I always complain cold invite except alumni of school/company or hot chicks (yeah, good linkedin photo works)

 
JimmyDnFFX:
John D. Peckerson:

I'm with hhodik on this one.. Man the people that cold invite me on linkedin really surprise me. Sometimes there is not even a message in the invite other than the standard one. Sure enough, every time they have invited also at least one colleague or friend.

Usually I just shake my head and ignore them.

Isn't that part of the whole purpose of networking? How are students, undergrad/MBA/etc, supposed to make connections in a field they have yet to break into? Other than career fairs and the like, what would you propose they do, when the conventional wisdom is to cast as wide a net as possible?

Don't be the guy that goes to the first event and ask if they are hiring.

If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!
 

This morning, I found out that I got banned by LinkedIn to send invitations without providing emails. It says that some recipients have claimed that they don't know me and the number of them has reached the threshold. I already removed the restriction by declaring that I understand the policy. Has this happened to anyone before? Can I do remove the restriction for unlimited times?

Quit being a creep.

 

This morning, I found out that I got banned by LinkedIn to send invitations without providing emails. It says that some recipients have claimed that they don't know me and the number of them has reached the threshold. I already removed the restriction by declaring that I understand the policy. Has this happened to anyone before? Can I do remove the restriction for unlimited times?

Don't cold invite people. It's annoying and gives you a bad reputation. Really solid candidate we had on the docket this summer was axed because he cold invited nearly the entire group and sent a baseless message to everyone. Stuff like that gets around.

InMail exists for a reason; if you really want to "network" on LinkedIn, use it. Better yet, get an email address.

 

To reiterate the above: I would not recommend sending LinkedIn connections to random people. In my opinion it is weird. I don't want to be "connected" to random people, especially someone that adds no value.

If there is a common connection, ie someone that went to my undergrad/grad school, I'd be more than happy to talk to them. Way less so if its just some kid that wants to break into the industry with zero ties to me.

What I'd recommend is using your schools alumni directory and reaching out to people directly via the email address they provide. Even after making a connection I wouldn't really add someone to LinkedIn after a one off call where the someone is doing me a favor.

Basically, ask yourself what is the point of being connected to someone you don't know. Its not like they are going to help you get a job or serve as a reference. This is a classic case of less is more.

 

If I remember correctly, LinkedIn permits sending a maximum of 3000 invitations (the number might have changed since I last saw). When you're sending an invitation, LinkedIn shows a message along the lines of "always send invitations only to people you know. Click here to know why." When you click on that link, it gives the details regarding the blocking policy specifically to prevent someone from sending mass invites, which includes a cap on the number of invites that you can send.

Move along, nothing to see here.
 

I'll chime in because I've hit that X a lot more recently than in years past. I'm pretty easy to find if you know my name (my email and direct phone number are on the internet on my team's website, along with my picture, blood type, loft on driver, and favorite color), so I consider a cold invite on LNKD really really lazy. if you're not sending them to people whose emails are public, be a little more targeted in your approach. maybe just message them instead of asking for a connection.

bottom line, I know what you're trying to do, but linkedin is an introductions tool so it's important to guard whom you let in your network (unless you're one of those bloggers who wants to be connected with literally everyone). In my case, I'm connected to clients, money managers, friends, Patrick (I guess you qualify as a friend), and prospects, no one else. no other brokers, no random open networkers, no broker recruiters, none of that crap. we use LNKD to try to draw connections between friends & clients to people we want to meet and also for people who are looking to see who we know (for example, estate planning attorneys, CPAs, etc.). for what you're talking about, taking some time to figure out email conventions is a better strategy. you can find email conventions both here and by looking at the companies' IR & press release pages.

tldr: don't do this, it's creepy and ineffective.

 

Happened to me once when I first started my LinkedIn (maybe around a year of having it). 99% of the time I was sending invites to people that I "knew" or had met and had a brief conversation with once. A few exceptions but I have since unconnected from the totally random people. Problem for me getting flagged (part of it at least) was I might remember meeting that VP at Anybank that went to my high school, but is he going to remember me, the random 19 year old he met a few months later who sends a generic linkedin invite? Maybe, but I would bet not.

Another problem for me (someone told me firsthand they rejected me because of this). My official first name starts with a different letter than the name I go by, and he told me he wasn't even thinking about my last name.

Now I always send a little note before the generic "I'd like to connect with you...", just to jog their memory of how we met or our last conversation.

 

Don't do this... it will just piss me off. If I do happen to remember you, I'll remember you as the jerk that cold connected without bothering to even change the default message.

My first question when I get an invite is "Where do I know them from?" If I can't answer that, I will hit the reject button and I always use the [I don't know them] button.

 

My company had a social media guy who was helping each employee get more friends/followers/connections. I had no idea he was cold inviting people on my linkedin account--hundreds of people--hundreds. I got warned by Linkedin. I was pretty pissed when I found out.

 

I thought I read an article once that claimed you could contact LinkedIn customer service and beg for forgiveness and have them restore your account. Not sure if that's accurate or not, but probably worth a shot.

"You are neither right nor wrong because the crowd disagrees with you. You are right because your data and reasoning are right." -Warren Buffett
 
Best Response

What is going on here? Telling people to not cold invite?! That is exactly what networking is. I pray many of you don't go to ACG events and just sit there because introducing yourself would be rude.

What not to do

1) Don't cold invite a million people.

This is the same principle as not hitting on every girl in the bar. They will see you as a shark and you'll just waste ammo. Add a couple people here and there, slow and steady. Reach out to them, personalize the message, try and find alumni first.

2) Don't use just Linkedin

Alumni networks from your school, email people on equity research reports, go to ACG/TMA events.

3) Provide some value.

People should be connecting with you also. Also, don't collect linkedin connections. They should be people you can reach out to and they should be within your field of work.

As for being banned, I got that restriction also I think way back when. It happens when people click that they don't know you. When weirdo's connect with me I simply ignore it because I respect their game and I am not a dick.

Man, some real miserable fucks on here. I've tend to believe that they people who HATE cold networking emails or go out of their way to be a dick about it are usually self important cocksuckers. Like wow, someone is trying to get a head in this world, thought you would be worthwhile to talk with or ask for help and you shit on them because they don't know you. Yeah, real short sighted approach. I sure as fuck hope I never get asked for help by someone who rocks this perspective in life. Take the stick out of your ass and try helping someone. Maybe they will do well and be able to return the favor one day.

Karma, smart networking, being nice, call it whatever you want. I call it being a finance professional and a human being.

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/trilantic-north-america>TNA</a></span>:

What is going on here? Telling people to not cold invite?! That is exactly what networking is. I pray many of you don't go to ACG events and just sit there because introducing yourself would be rude.

What not to do

1) Don't cold invite a million people.

This is the same principle as not hitting on every girl in the bar. They will see you as a shark and you'll just waste ammo. Add a couple people here and there, slow and steady. Reach out to them, personalize the message, try and find alumni first.

2) Don't use just Linkedin

Alumni networks from your school, email people on equity research reports, go to ACG/TMA events.

3) Provide some value.

People should be connecting with you also. Also, don't collect linkedin connections. They should be people you can reach out to and they should be within your field of work.

As for being banned, I got that restriction also I think way back when. It happens when people click that they don't know you. When weirdo's connect with me I simply ignore it because I respect their game and I am not a dick.

Man, some real miserable fucks on here. I've tend to believe that they people who HATE cold networking emails or go out of their way to be a dick about it are usually self important cocksuckers. Like wow, someone is trying to get a head in this world, thought you would be worthwhile to talk with or ask for help and you shit on them because they don't know you. Yeah, real short sighted approach. I sure as fuck hope I never get asked for help by someone who rocks this perspective in life. Take the stick out of your ass and try helping someone. Maybe they will do well and be able to return the favor one day.

Karma, smart networking, being nice, call it whatever you want. I call it being a finance professional and a human being.

Sorry but I have to agree with ANT/TNA here. There's a huge difference between sending out a million cold emails that are simply the equivalent of a generic form letter/spam and actual networking. I also agree that for a site that promotes getting into the industry, there are a lot of folks here who appear to have conveniently forgot what it was like when they started out or are far too busy to help others out when they were in the same position not long ago. Imagine if the folks who gave you a chance felt that gasp an email they received on a networking site was asking for advice and/or direction but they didn't yet know you. Oh the horror!
"Now go get your f'n shinebox!"
 

The cold invites I get have the standard LinkedIn invitation note. That's not something I feel compelled to respond to. I assume they hit the invite button inadvertently.

If some kid wrote a nice note stating why they wanted to get in touch, I would likely respond. I would much rather they emailed or called me though, instead of sending me a LinkedIn invitation.

 

Error ipsa ea soluta assumenda. Iure qui velit qui architecto ut. Unde reprehenderit libero velit tempora.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”