Curious to hear the story and background of the most complicated transaction you have been staffed on. Obviously, don't give any info out that may give away who the parties were.
I wish I had something more exciting to share - my most "exciting" transaction was a multi-part transaction which divested most of the operating entities of the parent company, and the other "part" was a sale of a product line. Needless to say, I wish I had more experience with more complicated transactions such as tax-free spinoffs. Maybe one day..
Healthcare deal where company would buy geographic assets from counterparty, counterparty would buy equity in client to fund further research and approval of assets with cash to client based on approval/development milestones and equity based milestones to client based on sales milestones; client wanted counterparty to fund portions of research if trails advanced and counterparty wanted to own more of client if that was the case, so would have option to buy equity at a predetermined price (negotiated premium to stock price). Also contemplated royalty payments to counterparty from client based on sales milestones. Very complicated on a probability weighted NPV value to bridge the gap between parties.
Rationale: counterparty wanted toehold in client, which specialized in non-core assets of counterparty and did not want to take the assets to market. Client wanted to have assets and did not have geographic presence. If deal went well, counterparty had stake that could fend off competition from buying and on a present value made the milestone and royalty payments worthwhile if they did not want to buy them and roll back up with bigger footprint and presence in asset market.
Lol, wtf.
^^^ fake news
Wow if this is real.... I had to read this more than once
I read more than once, still don't understand. Total mindfuck.
That is some Inception level shit right there.
I was thinking of shooting for Investment Banking post MBA, but after reading this post I might need to re evaluate my career goals. I did not understand a word of that post.
Since it’s banking we’re talking about, this definitely happened.
not sure if this is purposely written to sound more pedantic or complicated than it really is, but this is a very standard licensing agreement, with ownership options, royalties, and clinical trial funding arrangements, dependent on regulatory and commercialization milestones.
Pfizer, Lilly, AZN, JNJ, etc ink these sorts of deals on a quarterly basis. That being said, creating market models across marketed geographies, across patient populations, etc, can be a pain modeling-wise.
Relate to this a ton. Very market based (CAGR/EBITDA margin driven) especially if you are on SaaS/Enterprise Software deals.
Deal with 2 industry groups, 2 product groups - first of its kind technology / plant that required multiple tranches of debt and equity raises. At one point pivoted to an infrastructure type model that involved various royalty payments and triggers depending on pricing and volume and split the Company into 2 entities.
Def not as bad as George_Banker's though.
Mine wasn't complicated from a structuring standpoint, but our client's primary shareholder (~63%) died 2 days before the final agreement was to be signed. His 5 (yes, fucking 5) kids each got equal share of his ownership, and 2 of the fuckers talked the other 3 into trying to price gouge the counterparty.
Deal fell through. We dropped the relationship. Fun times all around.
Sorry, but I laughed at the "fun times all around" part.
That's why you pull out
(not talking about the deal here)
Random biotech company was failing and looking for a way to turn the business around. We lent them debt to finance purchase of bitcoin mining rigs and other bitcoin assets with deal in place to change the name of the Company to include blockchain in the ticker. With plan to refinance debt after name change and issuance of equity.
Original plan was simply to try and keep everyone’s jobs in place by facilitating an eventual equity raise. Plan was hugely successful and stock price sky rocketed 2,000% in 6 weeks. Ownership of company no longer wanted their jobs but tasked us with figuring out best way of liquidating their ownership in company.
They retired and tasked us with negotiating their yacht purchases since our prior Work was incredibly successful.
RIOT? That whole industry is ridiculous to be honest including them, LongFin, HIVE. Absolutely crazy
Ahaha yes. But I tried to not make it completely specific but that story fits it best.
Thought maybe you were joking. Wow, that's crazy stuff.
In my experience, even the most simple deals can turn overly complex because of ego and personalities.
I am sure someone else has said this as well: The most difficult/complicated scenarios I have ever worked on were dreamed up by eager VP/SVP's for pitches that usually didn't have a date...
Working on the Fisher Account was pretty complex
Consectetur accusamus tenetur eos quas non vero. Temporibus nihil quia a dolor debitis. Aut blanditiis est aut omnis aut. Optio incidunt voluptates vel quaerat necessitatibus optio. Eos ipsa et vitae ipsum. Neque non explicabo sit saepe iusto libero.
Ipsam voluptas magni commodi sint et blanditiis pariatur. Quo corporis asperiores aut excepturi maiores aut.
Consequatur laborum et accusamus ipsum et. Autem consectetur eius omnis rerum tempora numquam. Quibusdam placeat error velit rerum at. Repellendus cum labore error et quis.
Qui impedit tenetur voluptatem incidunt fuga autem occaecati. Perspiciatis praesentium at reprehenderit odio et maiores dolore. Quaerat quis vitae et ipsa iste. Magnam iusto qui quos magni molestiae dolores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Reprehenderit quam nam omnis recusandae ea quam. Tenetur vitae est rem optio cum qui nemo voluptatem. Ad est eum quidem et doloremque eum consequatur quo. Sit molestias et dolores et ratione fugiat nisi corporis. Quod et et maxime voluptatem aut provident dolor dolorem. Recusandae sunt minus et corporis ullam earum est.
Ea rerum rerum voluptatem autem. Aut quis error non voluptas dolor distinctio ea.