MSF and MiM School List

I'm finishing up apps and narrowing my target list. 3.1 GPA, 680 (41,41) GMAT, URM, Bio Major, 1 summer of research, 1 MM SA position. Should I add any more or delete any on the list.

My current schools are:
Wake Forest MA (In with 5K)
UVA (Submitted)
Duke (Submitted)
UIUC (Submitted)
UT-Austin (Essay Finished)
Ohio State (In Progress)
SMU (Contemplating Starting)
Villanova (In Progress)

 

I'd take a look at the MSF at the University of Rochester as well, they have a 1 yr full time program in Rochester and a 13-month weekend program in NYC that I'm finishing up. Recruiting isn't top notch, but the education is excellent. Faculty are all PhD from top tier business schools (Chicago, Wharton) and experts in their fields. The program is very quantitative and intense, but hands down you will know your stuff when you finish.

"you can turn off the sun but I'm still gunna shine" - Jason Mraz
 

Are you solely concentrated on going to school in the US?

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 

I think you underestimate your application strength. Don't waste time and money adding anymore schools. You will get into most of the ones you have listed above.

 

I'm surprised people are so confident in his chances. Gives me hope if I want to get a Masters.

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 
Karembeu5163:
TNA:
GPA is on the lower end, but not horrible. GMAT is on the higher end. Couple internships and a hard UG major.

My prediction:

In at every program, with UVA being the toughest sell.

ANT, is the GPA not being horrible in an absolute or relative sense (URM)?

Most MSF programs have like a 3.4-3.5 average GPA. 3.1 is lower, but offset by a hard UG major.

When it comes to MSF programs you are usually ok with a lower GPA, but you need to have a higher GMAT. GMAT is key. 680 is in the sweet spot. If you have internships it helps also.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
Duke will be a challenge. I think most other programs will take you.

What is your math background? You may want to put in a bid at the MFE programs if you have calculus-based probability on your resume. Cornell and Chicago are a mild reach, but still possible.

I don't, just your standard probability and statistics I, I'm more interested in IB not S&T/Risk, so I wasn't looking at more quant focused MSFs even.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
Duke will be a challenge. I think most other programs will take you.

What is your math background? You may want to put in a bid at the MFE programs if you have calculus-based probability on your resume. Cornell and Chicago are a mild reach, but still possible.

How is Duke a challenge? I know a bunch of admitted students with lower stats. UVA is the only one on that list that is going to be a stretch.

@ Future Doc - have you emailed Kendra at Duke yet? I'd ping her. She's very helpful and it would be good to get your name circulating around the adcom office. If I see her Thursday in DC I will mention your name.

 
Best Response

ANT, any thoughts on Stanford for Karembau?

I had always thought their admission process was significantly tougher than the three C schools, though not as bad as MIT.

Given a solid math curriculum, that also would be in the sweet spot.

Also, I had always been of the view that UChicago/Cornell/Columbia/NYU still look for coursework and decent grades in calculus-based probability, linear algebra, and diffyqs. In other words, if you took linear algebra and got a B-, submitting a Math GRE II score of 700 would not hurt.

A 3.5 GPA is not a problem, and a 740 GMAT will clear most hurdles, but the tougher admissions decisions start to look a bit more like that of an MBA. Industry experience and personals become more important differentiators.

 

No clue on Standford. MFE programs are a different ball of wax. I'll defer to you and Andy at Quantnet when it comes to those degrees.

 

1) Yes, building rapport with the adcoms is key. Don't be annoying, but if you can be more than just a faceless application it will help.

2) More work experience will not hurt you for admissions, but it will hamstring you for a job. If you have 3 years or more experience you should go for an MBA, unless you want to use the MSF as your MBA substitute and you are not looking to work FO finance.

3)You can use an MSF to break into AM for sure. Since it utilizes a lot of CFA material you will gain some of the same skill sets. Many MSF students study for and take the CFA while doing an MSF.

4) Being Asian doesn't hurt you, but being a citizen in the US does help you.

 
TNA:
1) Yes, building rapport with the adcoms is key.......

+1 for all the help providing others in the thread.

I'm going to PM you related to this thread since I dont want to jack it any further, thanks in advance for any help!

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 
yeahright:
TNA:
1) Yes, building rapport with the adcoms is key.......

+1 for all the help providing others in the thread.

I'm going to PM you related to this thread since I dont want to jack it any further, thanks in advance for any help!

Same...+1 for ANT & IP for helping. I will take this to PMs as well since I feel like I've derailed this from the OP's original question.

 
VoidTrading:
Hey ANT and IP.

Thanks so much for helping everyone out. I have a question regarding building a rapport with AdComs:

How would you suggest building one without being annoying? Do you have any tips?

You just email them and speak with them about the school and program. Maybe visit campus. Nothing serious, but it adds some personality to your application.

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/trilantic-north-america>TNA</a></span>:
VoidTrading:
Hey ANT and IP.

Thanks so much for helping everyone out. I have a question regarding building a rapport with AdComs:

How would you suggest building one without being annoying? Do you have any tips?

You just email them and speak with them about the school and program. Maybe visit campus. Nothing serious, but it adds some personality to your application.

Thanks ANT!!

 
VoidTrading:
Hey ANT and IP.

Thanks so much for helping everyone out. I have a question regarding building a rapport with AdComs:

How would you suggest building one without being annoying? Do you have any tips?

I am extremely conservative, but that is not the approach I took with Princeton. Most schools do not want to be contacted or risk having the admission process biased.

If you get an interview with someone from the admissions office, that's a great foothold for next time if they reject you. Contrary to popular belief, I am convinced that if you apply once, get interviewed, and get rejected, and your CIRCUMSTANCES MATERIALLY IMPROVE, you have better odds than you'd otherwise have on your second application. Just try to find a rapport with the interviewer and SEND A THANK YOU.

So maybe the approach is to apply this year, and if you get rejected, spend two years at a trading firm, then reapply. Your circumstances have materially changed, your application will be seen in a new light, and if that interviewer liked you, you've now got an even more fierce lobbyist who can also say "Told ya so" to the prior detractors. That's really powerful, IMHO. I don't know why folks think reapplications are such a bad thing IF YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES HAVE IMPROVED.

So my strategy for MIT and Princeton would be to take a dual track approach. Apply now, and try to find an FO banking job- leveraging your sector experience if possible. If you are rejected but get an FO job, work there for two years and reapply. If some folks liked you the first time around, you can be sure they'll make sure your application gets a long, hard look.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
VoidTrading:
Hey ANT and IP.

Thanks so much for helping everyone out. I have a question regarding building a rapport with AdComs:

How would you suggest building one without being annoying? Do you have any tips?

I am extremely conservative, but that is not the approach I took with Princeton. Most schools do not want to be contacted or risk having the admission process biased.

If you get an interview with someone from the admissions office, that's a great foothold for next time if they reject you. Contrary to popular belief, I am convinced that if you apply once, get interviewed, and get rejected, and your CIRCUMSTANCES MATERIALLY IMPROVE, you have better odds than you'd otherwise have on your second application. Just try to find a rapport with the interviewer and SEND A THANK YOU.

So maybe the approach is to apply this year, and if you get rejected, spend two years at a trading firm, then reapply. Your circumstances have materially changed, your application will be seen in a new light, and if that interviewer liked you, you've now got an even more fierce lobbyist who can also say "Told ya so" to the prior detractors. That's really powerful, IMHO. I don't know why folks think reapplications are such a bad thing IF YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES HAVE IMPROVED.

Whoa. Never looked at it that way (re-applying). I was not planning on going to apply for a program yet, but was targetting the near future. Also- congrats on Princeton!

 

Rerum est eveniet sit temporibus tenetur. Unde quia vitae fugit molestiae beatae est porro ut. Nisi tempore quidem quam non assumenda. Fuga esse quia magnam ullam. Veritatis ipsam consequatur cumque ex vel.

Sapiente et consequuntur voluptatum quia. Accusantium at velit beatae aut quidem. Repudiandae numquam voluptatum perspiciatis animi.

Omnis consequuntur quam deserunt molestias voluptas sit. Iste possimus eligendi doloribus iusto beatae. Amet cumque possimus voluptatibus eos. Est laboriosam quidem eum.

Quas itaque accusantium earum sint. Consequuntur cum aut reprehenderit unde laboriosam odio pariatur. Sit porro fugiat repellendus. Omnis voluptate vel vero dicta.

 

Rerum tenetur eveniet vel autem aliquid voluptatem et. Itaque rerum id sequi adipisci non officiis. Et ratione expedita incidunt accusantium iure. Aliquid expedita sint aspernatur in omnis dicta. Sunt hic soluta qui neque voluptatem sed voluptate. Iusto sequi numquam quibusdam dolor voluptatem.

Voluptas alias alias ratione dignissimos eligendi odit repellat asperiores. Et asperiores voluptas aut est odit similique. Quis corporis voluptate omnis perferendis distinctio rem voluptatem rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”