Question for Acquisition Guys

What are the first 5 things you immediately begin digging into when you get an Argus file from a broker for a potential acquisition? I recently started an acquisitions role for a smaller group with no real underwriting policies and procedures or manual. I have a little bit of acquisitions experience, but the bulk of my experience has been on the construction lending side. Appreciate any insight. Thanks.

 

Ranked in terms of importance:

-Check the MLAs and see which ones are being applied to each lease

-Check the lease up of vacant space to see how aggressive the broker was

-Check the RR against Argus to make sure the lease inputs are correct

-Check the opex numbers to see if they gut check, and the expense categories/recovery structures to see if recoveries are over/understated

-Check all the miscellaneous stuff like vacancy / credit allowance, other income, and inflation (this stuff is all pretty standard)

 
cre_questions:
Ranked in terms of importance:

-Check the MLAs and see which ones are being applied to each lease

-Check the lease up of vacant space to see how aggressive the broker was

-Check the RR against Argus to make sure the lease inputs are correct

-Check the opex numbers to see if they gut check, and the expense categories/recovery structures to see if recoveries are over/understated

-Check all the miscellaneous stuff like vacancy / credit allowance, other income, and inflation (this stuff is all pretty standard)

This. Also see what CapEx, if any, is being underwritten (whether it's reserves or actual projects) because a broker would likely understate them.

 
cre_questions:
-Check the RR against Argus to make sure the lease inputs are correct

I'm beating a dead horse by expressing my utter contempt for the broker world, but these people are so transparently unethical that you can literally trust them about nothing. To your point, you'll see a rent roll with every tenant in the range of 2.5-3% annual rent increase and the broker will throw in 3.3% (which makes a HUGE differences in valuation). I get it--caveat emptor, but come on, man--have you no pride in your work?

Array
 

Seconded, it seems like they all try to pull this shit with the matrices. e.g. instead of plugging 3 months free rent, setting it to 3 for the first two years, then down to 2, 1, and none by year five.

 

I do agree with the above posts that there's a basic checkbox you run down - but that shouldn't take more than 30min to an hour. For me, if it's an analyst I've never dealt with or a company we haven't done a transaction with, I need to get comfortable with how they are using Argus. Despite it being a relatively level modelling tool, there are many ways to approach a single question.

In the end, I always pull out the ol' HP and back check it. Many analysts don't do this and get caught big time. A common theme I will see if people double counting rent growth by applying rent escalators in the MLA as well as the overall assumptions, or vice versa (not growing MLA rents and assuming that MLA $/SF now will be the same price in 7 years).

My point is there are a lot of little fine tuning parts of Argus you need to make sure are being used correctly and not incorrectly inflating/deflating rents. Again my experience has been that the most common overlooks are on the application of MLA's and growth rates.

 

Sed incidunt voluptas facilis qui sed. Numquam voluptatem aut ad autem. Est praesentium neque libero temporibus libero iure delectus. Ut voluptatibus sunt culpa ab iusto perspiciatis. Nobis molestiae sit consequatur optio et itaque cumque. Error adipisci id beatae ex dignissimos. Consequatur dolores aut consequatur nam odio vel ipsum ut.

Ut enim aut in commodi. Inventore quasi sint magni corrupti suscipit ex. Occaecati aut aut quo. Reiciendis recusandae sint asperiores ut quas culpa. Fugiat omnis qui voluptatem odio saepe quaerat dicta. Reprehenderit velit enim iste sunt quidem. Esse voluptas a ut exercitationem voluptas.

Quis repellendus commodi at tempora praesentium vero qui. Vel veniam deleniti tenetur reprehenderit voluptatem exercitationem. Facilis quia ex expedita error et et sed et.

Deserunt omnis laborum error et exercitationem alias minima. Sed sunt ad amet iusto aspernatur rem. Cumque et quos nam eligendi aut qui sint. Facilis veniam sunt possimus voluptas adipisci. Reiciendis id non dignissimos aut aperiam autem at eius.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (89) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”