Question while trying to model my own portfolio optimization

So I've learnt the theory, bits and pieces of it, through CFA and what not. and I have to admit my knowledge has gone abit dry.

I'm trying to apply the theory into practice and I'm running into 'practical' problems

So I've picked a few shares, created models out of it. Lets say I have 3 mid cap stocks A B and C
Using DCF, and WACC and CAPM etc.
A is currently priced at $500, my valuation came to $800 per share.
B at 300, my valuation at 400 per share
C at 400, valuation at 500 per share.

Now I have these three shares in my portfolio and I'm trying to work out what the optimal weight is.
Now here's my trouble.

I can work out the standard deviation (let's say at a monthly s.d.) is.
but how do I know what my "expected return" is? is it simply the return I hope to make as the price converges back to my calculated intrinsic value (i.e. 60% for A, 33% for B, 25% for C)

it sort of makes sense, but then I wouldn't know whether that would be appropriate as a "monthly expected return" as I have no timeframe for how long it would take for the price to return to my calculated intrinsic value (whether it be days weeks or years)

or alternatively, would my "expected return" be based on the IRR that makes the future cashflows in my DCF equal to the current share price?

 
Best Response

I know this doesn't answer your entire question, but IMO you're trying to ask for too many separate parts at once and over simplifying what you're looking for... Here is my take on the expected return issue. This is a super simplified answer, so I'm sure people will think they're BSD's by correcting it, but here is a short take on your issue without diving too far into the weeds:

Your cost of equity is the essentially the expected return. CAPM is one way to calculate this, but fyi, most studies show it's very inaccurate.

The IRR is the return of the firm value as a whole including debt, because the sum of the DCF is the enterprise value discounted by the WACC, which is capital structure neutral. This would not be correct IRR to evaluate your proposed equity position. You need to use CF to equity and find the IRR (which would be the cost of equity/expected return based on your assumptions) to find what you are looking for.

Look at it as two separate items you are calculating: theoretical return & your assumed return. Cost of equity is the theoretical return you should see on the stock based on it's systematic risk, which based on CAPM is the only risk you are rewarded for taking on. The IRR you are calculating (if you change the DCF to be equity value instead of enterprise value), is your expected return based on the assumptions you have made about growth, margins, etc.

Therefore, assuming your assumptions are 100% correct, if the IRR is greater than the Cost of Equity based on systematic risk, you should buy that stock in a diversified portfolio b/c you will earn extra return (alpha) in addition to the return based on the market risk you are taking on.

It's not the company. It's the credibility. My credibility. I can't just sit on the bench and let other people play the game. Not my game. Not with their rules. - Henry Kravis, Barbarians at the Gate
 

Laudantium commodi ab commodi exercitationem. Aliquid occaecati explicabo reiciendis qui alias rem quia hic.

Consequatur culpa quos at nemo porro debitis et porro. Quis et natus perferendis harum. Aut sit dolorem temporibus ut itaque officia et est. Culpa incidunt voluptates ad et dolore. Repudiandae consequatur quisquam adipisci quod perferendis atque. Voluptatem aut atque omnis sunt.

In quos beatae est cupiditate asperiores eos. Aliquam vero eveniet et.

It's not the company. It's the credibility. My credibility. I can't just sit on the bench and let other people play the game. Not my game. Not with their rules. - Henry Kravis, Barbarians at the Gate

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”