Re: What should I do to marry a rich guy?
Guess there are lots of girls out there who have similar questions. Please allow me to analyse your situation as a professional investor. My annual income is more than $25M, so I hope everyone believes that I’m not wasting time here.
From the standpoint of a business person, it is a bad decision to marry you. The answer is very simple, so let me explain. Put the details aside, what you’re trying to do is an exchange of “beauty” and “money”: Person A provides beauty, and Person B pays for it, fair and square. However, there’s a deadly problem here, your beauty will fade, but my money will not be gone without any good reason. In fact my income might increase from year to year, but you can’t be prettier year after year. Hence from the viewpoint of economics, I am an appreciation asset, and you are a depreciation asset. It’s not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation. If that is your only asset, your value will be much worse 10 years later. By the terms we use in Wall Street, every trading has a position, dating with you is also a “trading position”. If the trade value dropped we will sell it and it is not a good idea to keep it for long term – same goes with the marriage that you wanted. It might be cruel to say this, but in order to make a wiser decision any assets with great depreciation value will be sold or “leased”.
Anyone with over $500k annual income is not a fool; we would only date you, but will not marry you. I would advice that you forget looking for any clues to marry a rich guy. And by the way, you could make yourself to become a rich person with $500k annual income. This has better chance than finding a rich fool.
Hope this helps.
Jamie
Mod Note (Andy): top 50 posts of 2017, this one ranks #33 (based on # of silver bananas)
https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/a-reply-from-ceo-of-jp-morgan-to…
This must get posted every few months on this forum.
Nice copy paste brah
Banana farming at its finest, folks.
I don't see how banana farms are relevant...
This is the real Jamie Dimon omg...
Jamie Dimon, still an orangutan.....meh
This was a great post when I read it 10 years ago. Literally this has been around for at least 10 years.
It's been so overused, even on 9gag, tumblr, reddit, etc. I remember reading this when I was in high school...
At least have the decency of correcting the grammar if you are going to copy paste. For fuck sake it's expected to write poorly on original content, but here... What a fucking disaster, and yeah - it was funny 10 years ago.
8 million sugar babies!! there are certainly a lot o fish in the sea.
https://www.seekingarrangement.com/about-us/
What's DickFuld saying about it ?
As someone who use this site for close to 10 years, can we take off these so called entertaining characters? (i.e. JamesDimon). If we don't do that, WSO will become something like "Business Insider". Although I can understand the appeal of having entertainment content, WSO would be best served on focusing quality contents on getting people into high finance industry and growing/progressing their careers. Thanks.
Fugiat molestias occaecati dolorem eos et. Quo est ab minus doloremque incidunt unde magni. Reiciendis voluptatem autem id sit omnis officia rerum voluptatem.
Ad unde ea odit aut odit autem voluptate quo. Impedit omnis facilis sunt consequatur et. Repellendus molestiae quia voluptate quia ex dicta.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...