Howard Wang, a former analyst at Ray Dalio’s Bridgewater Associates started Convoy Investments LLC, a macro fund that isn't charging a performance fee and only a 1.25% management fee. He's also taking foundations and pensions money for free -up to 25% AUM.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-08-05/ex-bridgewater-analyst-wang-st…
Thoughts ?
| +168 | Q&A: I'm a Pod PM | 87 | 1d |
| +11 | Should I get an MBA for VC after Tech PM? | 2 | 2d |
| +9 | Stay or leave? | 1 | 2d |
| +6 | Lateraling to MM L/S | 1 | 4d |
| +6 | Tips for breaking into Macro RV? | 1 | 1d |
| +3 | Jain | 1 | 1d |
| +3 | Citadel Pitch Comp | 2 | 50m |
| +2 | Top Books for Hedge Funds Today | 4 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I think he's just trying to break from the pack to have an easier time raising capital. You don't hear about Bridgewater alumni very often.
How is what he is doing more honest? It's a hedge fund that works like a mutual fund and that's supposed to somehow make sense? Makes very little sense...
I would much rather see honesty along the lines of what Convexity has done with their "clawback", rather than this silly gimmick...
This seems like a good example of you get what you pay for. Why would anyone give a 28 year old junior level employee from Bridgewater without any real investment responsibility any money and then pay him for beta exposure? He is right that most funds don't merit a 2/20.
Surprised to see this given what you read/hear about Bridgewater's lawsuits/non-competes etc (even at lower levels, from what I hear). Comments about current capital managed lead me to believe this may be because he's really struggling to raise funds.
He quit (was fired from?) Bridgewater in January 2012 and has been working on his track record since.
His 32-year old partner looks older than Greg Oden.
I'm not sure why they need a $200M raise. Sure, everyone would like to start big but be realistic. Start small for a couple of years, prove yourself, and then raise more funds. My guess is they can't because some flamer like these guys will come in, charge 1%, and also follow a beta strategy.
Disaster waiting to happen in my opinion.
I heard about this. That guy must be really desperate for money and has absolutely no track record or leverage in negotiation to show for. If I were a LP I would be very wary of something like this. It means little that he only takes 1.25% management fee if after a year your asset shrinks.
Consequatur voluptatem vel dolorem reprehenderit. Ut quos tempore in nihil in labore ducimus. Veritatis sequi error illum harum. Eius harum dolorem soluta consectetur velit. Culpa aliquam laboriosam esse sed.
Illum minima vitae aut modi ex expedita. Odit eos ut quis laudantium explicabo unde quis. Quis quia dolorem dicta qui. Mollitia libero molestias sequi libero soluta.
Omnis velit sequi ut laboriosam et ut sed. Doloremque consequuntur rerum sunt eum. Dolorem amet libero sit velit atque. Eius similique sit non atque.
Et porro eius et voluptas quae. Dolores necessitatibus error omnis. Distinctio voluptate neque ad consectetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...