Restructuring IB vs Consulting

Can someone please explain to me the difference between RX IB (Houlihan, PJT, Rothschild, Evercore) and RX Consulting (A&M, FTI, AlixPartners)?I'm aware of the differences between debtor and creditor advisory. More so trying to figure out what roles these two play in a bankruptcy, day to day work, exit ops, comp, etc.I am told that for someone who wishes to work in RX long-term, consulting might be the way to go (especially FTI). Any truth in this?

 

RX banking raises capital and does a sale process if these options are chosen. Rx consultants focus on operational improvements and create detailed projections (usually consultants do most of the projections and bankers select a discount rate for valuation). Both of the roles overlap quite a bit: both often compete directly for creditor engagements, analyze the capital structure, evaluate strategic options, etc.

A&M and Alix are considered the two best firms in rx consulting; FTI is third. As for consulting or banking, you have to determine which one you like better? Consulting has better hours with lower pay.

 

Thank you for your clarification.

It seems to me then, that RX banking is basically a distressed M&A role. Why is it that bankers are paid more, and are likely to exit into PE or HF roles, when the consultants are doing most of the “important” work - actually turning around the business? How significant is the pay gap anyway?

Also, why the MS? I thought your answer was pretty straightforward. Perhaps it’s the firm rankings?

 
Most Helpful

RX is much better characterized as liability management than distressed M&A.  Yeah, there are distressed M&A deals that you could work on, but those are the exception rather than the rule.  As opposed to the consultants, the bankers are going to be focused on exchanges, negotiations regarding extensions/covenant modifications/waivers w/ existing lenders, refinancings, and in the context of an in-court process, the economic terms of the plan (DIP, exit financing, consideration to prepetition creditors, rights-offerings & backstops, MIPs, equity tips to out-of-the money creditors, etc.).  This is why buy-side exit opps are much better for bankers as opposed to consultants. 

I come from down in the valley, where mister when you're young, they bring you up to do like your daddy done
 

Here’s the best way to think about it.

Turnaround Consultants are asset focused (left side of the balance sheet)

Rx bankers are liability focused (right side of the balance sheet)

There isn’t a hard rule that says consultants can’t advise on liabilities, or bankers can’t advise on operational improvements (the assets), it’s just usually how things play out

That said, for creditor engagements, I have no clue what the consultants do. Maybe in that scenario they do directly compete with bankers for the same mandates

 

Thanks - that makes sense.

Consultants on the creditor side basically review the debtors plan of reorganization, challenge valuations and DIP financing term, look for other sources of returns that could potentially maximize creditor recoveries (fraudulent payment, preferential treatment 90 days prior to the bankruptcy, etc) and represent unsecured creditor committees who individually would not hire their own counsel/ FA’s. I am likely missing a few other things, but this seems to be the gist of it.

 

From people I talked to, they told me rx consulting to a deal team is pretty challenging without rx banking experience. I think operational roles at distressed PE shops are pretty doable though.

 

Aliquid eos dolorum porro itaque rerum ullam quia et. In suscipit architecto consequatur et accusamus harum reiciendis. Beatae possimus voluptas molestiae et aut ipsam vitae sit. Harum voluptatem iure fugit laboriosam id ut. Rerum est maiores magnam veritatis ad. Qui aliquam officiis aut quia excepturi voluptate dolorem. Placeat harum officia debitis quasi ut in deleniti aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (90) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”