What's the best way to model a waterfall in Asset Management? I made the switch over from acquisitions, so I know how to run a waterfall if it's only forward looking....
However, now that I'm in Asset Management, it seems like a messy job piecing together historicals and projections together to run through a waterfall. Anyone have a good clean way to do this?
| +43 | What should we be buying? | 28 | 23h |
| +31 | Uncertain of what To Do Next | 5 | 4d |
| +31 | Where are free agents signing? | 9 | 3h |
| +28 | Capital Restricted Developer | 2 | 4d |
| +28 | Laughable Job Posting | 5 | 22h |
| +23 | Warning: J. Shaw Recruiters | 5 | 4d |
| +8 | Development Budget: use RENTABLE or GROSS BUILDABLE sf? | 3 | 1d |
| +6 | First-year REPE analyst comp check (London) | 1 | 5d |
| +4 | Vandy MSF or NYU MSRE | 4 | 4d |
| +4 | Shops with largest intern classes | 5 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Same waterfall, just have a budget to actual for your cash flow proforma. The only thing that would change would be your expected cash flow, the structure should not change from the JV docs
Editing because it sounds like you get it conceptually. I think you just have to hardcode in the historical data for year 1, year 2, etc (or on a monthly basis).
If your historical are more detailed than your model, you can “code” each line item to match your original model
Should be pretty straightforward. Bring your actuals into the cash flow up to X date, this date being latest period actuals are available for, and continue to take the forecast from that point on. Sense check variances vs. overall budget, make sure you’re not missing a big payment about to go out which was in the forecast just prior to X date but hasn’t hit the actuals yet.
Pull your actuals in from a separate underlying sheet where they’re hardcoded rather than hardcoding into the same cash flow where you project forecasts, makes it much easier to quickly compare historic projections vs actuals and sense check variances.
Why did you switch jobs?
As has been mentioned, the waterfall is consistent. The historicals will be the actual contributions and distributions that has occurred. On go-forward projections, I'd loop in your reforecasted pro-forma projections along with the assumed reversion value. If applicable, account for your cash balance at sale as well. Good luck!
Dignissimos dolore odit consectetur laboriosam ipsam eum. Sint est ipsam occaecati cum. Suscipit nostrum quo modi vel ea ut exercitationem. Praesentium qui ex est est eum sunt et.
Sequi unde aliquam molestiae sed minus doloribus sequi. Omnis sed neque reiciendis ut officia tempora.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...