MBA bound: things I wish I'd known during the app process

XXxxxxxxxxx

XXxxxxxxxxx

XXxxxxxxxxx

XXxxxxxxxxx

XXxxxxxxxxx

XXxxxxxxxxx

XXxxxxxxxxx

XXxxxxxxxxx

27 Comments
 

Congratulations of your acceptance to Wharton.

I applied to several schools for R2, so still on the tail end of the application process. I didn't apply to UPenn, but nonetheless the group interview interested me.

Can you write a bit more about how it was? Did you feel that people were "playing a game" or "too strategic" in their comments, which are two things I've heard about the process? In whole, did you find it a better experience than the more traditional Stanford interview?

 

Congratulations! I strongly agree with you on the point "Your undergrad, company name, and GMAT are far more important factors to the adcom". Stories in essay are important, but there is a quantitative threshold that candidates need to pass to get into an elite business school such as Wharton.

We hear a lot of those "How I got into Harvard with 650 GMAT" or "How I got into Wharton with a 620 GMAT", those are always going to be rarities and something else about their profile that made them stand out.

Bottom line: Do try to score as high as possible on GMAT and if you have a chance to join a blue-chip company for a decent role after undergraduate, I believe it adds credibility.

 

The MBA application is ultimately a marketing tool. I think what would better help these pre-MBAers is how did you sell yourself to these top-schools in which you were ultimately successful in gaining an admission. The background you presented seems to be 1 of 10,000, and also note the mantra known throughout M7 schools is that a top gmat score doesn't get you in, and a bad GMAT score definitely will keep you out. Essentially, the GMAT is a check mark for these schools and is not least of which a factor that determines admission over other applicants; it just gets you a ticket to play in the pool of "possible candidates". There must have been something else to your application. If you said I'm a top 25 ugrad working in consulting with aspirations of banking/MB(B) and a 750 gmat score, I think you would likely have been passed over...

Just my .02s

 

I disagree on your point in terms of GMAT vs. positioning. If you have a GMAT above the average, top school, top/2nd tier employer, your chances are already pretty high. Positioning yourself to the max vs. positioning yourself to be OK I think has a far smaller impact than a 700 vs. a 750 GMAT.

The variability in what you can write about is so wide that reading 10 applications is just that... 10 data points on what got people into their schools. And you'll never see the 1,000s of other data points that did and didn't get applicants in. For how to prepare, I suggest people spend more time trying to get a GMAT above the average and less time trying to think about a compelling essay topic, simply because the essay topics/positioning of yourself should come naturally. People aren't spending 50 hours thinking of essay topics. But hopefully they're spending 50 hours studying for the GMAT.

But to answer your question, my positioning was something to the extent of: 1) Thought big in terms of my aspirations and ensured they had buzzwords relevant to current trends: green, startup, etc. 2) Connected the dots from my personal interests to why I did consulting to why MBA to how all those three prior dots make me a logical leader in the green tech space.

 
Best Response

Dude, congrats! Also headed to Wharton this fall and didn't have a golden background. The thing that I'd say is that at Wharton, and especially at Harvard and Stanford, you need something special or unique driving you in. I didn't come from an ideal role beforehand (i.e., not MBB or top PE), so I had a few strengths that drove me in, namely strong performance at work, dedication to charity, and a very high GMAT. Each piece of differentiation is critical. I think that my profile with a 720-range GMAT probably wouldn't have gotten a second look, and the same goes for if my total impact at work and ECs had been significantly smaller. Each weakness in the profile must be offset by some sort of strength - don't expect adcoms to blink at weaknesses.

 

Omnis commodi corrupti id occaecati laudantium est. Incidunt dolor nemo cum suscipit ut sequi. Sed voluptatum ipsam necessitatibus omnis nihil et. Ea esse ea fuga modi rem voluptates possimus. Numquam totam ratione unde. Aut asperiores corrupti sint ratione repellendus.

Ullam eius quaerat magni quasi eius voluptas. In et modi ex tenetur modi consequatur occaecati. Accusantium eligendi sed dolore saepe officia. Rerum et corrupti ratione optio aspernatur dolor. Ullam quod nemo delectus ducimus et. Qui est id aut ipsam.

Perferendis quas molestiae fugiat laboriosam odit optio possimus. Modi non adipisci commodi aut sunt quis aliquid. Aliquam reiciendis minima consectetur sit fuga voluptatem quod. Dolores porro omnis molestiae ab facere expedita voluptas. Accusamus dolorum illo ipsa dolorem nihil ut. Cumque sed praesentium beatae accusamus ab non.

Ipsa mollitia asperiores nemo modi earum veritatis. Et voluptas assumenda nemo iure voluptates.

 

Voluptas sunt rerum neque voluptatem ut fugit eius. Asperiores deserunt vel et sed sed sapiente et. Quibusdam omnis labore voluptatem et error consectetur. Rerum deleniti neque sit ducimus quia et.

Veritatis sed est totam iste sed et odit. Voluptatem aspernatur blanditiis pariatur veniam in totam voluptatibus. Labore et commodi distinctio. Aspernatur aperiam corrupti et assumenda cum non. Saepe fugiat veritatis nobis laboriosam doloremque beatae id exercitationem. Vitae necessitatibus fuga ea velit sint et libero. Ducimus commodi quod qui quibusdam dolores rerum harum.

Voluptatem earum perferendis quidem. Ut eum earum soluta dignissimos facere officia vel. Eum non adipisci dolore magnam maxime. Fuga dolor dolor esse quam dolorem est.

Quia earum quod omnis eligendi doloremque at qui et. Accusamus ullam tenetur nisi vel laboriosam dolorem cum necessitatibus. Quasi distinctio suscipit quidem voluptatem aut. Alias tenetur accusamus eos sed eius reiciendis quas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”