-non-target accounting and finance double major, 3.75 GPA
-two years MM IB (just a hair below the likes of Lazard and Evercore)
-two years MM PE
-720 GMAT
My ideal schools to apply to would be Wharton, Booth, and Columbia. Any advice would be appreciarws
You're probably competitive for those if you have good leadership experience (ECs maybe) and execute on the essays. Wharton may or may not be a stretch but the other two are doable.
This is BS. I know way too many 3.7s and 700+ GMATs who got rejected sight unseen at top schools. This does not take into account your essays or ECs or references etc. This might work for Med school or law school where admission decisions are number driven.
Everything looks good, solid work exp, good gpa and majors, solid GMAT. Any volunteer work? Are you a urm? Also curious, a MM a hair below evercore and Lazard?
Your resume is solid. As the above posters said, you're competitive at all the b-schools except HBS and Stanford. Just write awesome essays, get solid recs, and try to stand out. Don't discuss only work in your essays and make sure you come across as an interesting multi-dimensional person, rather than as a finance robot.
apply early-round at Columbia and sing praises for Columbia and how you've always wanted to go there. Just realize that if your admitted you'll have to plunk down some cash and "request" that you not be considerd for admittance at the other schools you applied to; admitance will occur before you hear back from the other schools. I know someone with similar stats - lower gpa, but higher GMAT, and lower-tier PE firm - that got in.
apply early-round at Columbia and sing praises for Columbia and how you've always wanted to go there. Just realize that if your admitted you'll have to plunk down some cash and "request" that you not be considerd for admittance at the other schools you applied to; admitance will occur before you hear back from the other schools. I know someone with similar stats - lower gpa, but higher GMAT, and lower-tier PE firm - that got in.
The OP is actually over-qualified for columbia ED. I know a lot of subpar people who got in because they knew they couldn't get in regular decision or the other M7 schools. IMO, the OP is competitive at wharton and booth and should not preclude his options by binding himself to columbia, unless of course he visits and absolutely falls in love with the school.
apply early-round at Columbia and sing praises for Columbia and how you've always wanted to go there. Just realize that if your admitted you'll have to plunk down some cash and "request" that you not be considerd for admittance at the other schools you applied to; admitance will occur before you hear back from the other schools. I know someone with similar stats - lower gpa, but higher GMAT, and lower-tier PE firm - that got in.
The OP is actually over-qualified for columbia ED. I know a lot of subpar people who got in because they knew they couldn't get in regular decision or the other M7 schools. IMO, the OP is competitive at wharton and booth and should not preclude his options by binding himself to columbia, unless of course he visits and absolutely falls in love with the school.
Dude, the MBA landscape is changing. There is no such thing as a shoo-in at the top schools. My advice was for the OP to improve his chances to get into Columbia because there are no guarantees.
Based on the limited information provided, my estimates are below. I know people with very, very similar profiles that applied last cycle, including myself.
H/S - Long Shot
Wharton - Reach
Chicago + Sloan + Kellogg - 50/50, maybe 40/60 (not in your favor)
Columbia - Competitive
CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
Based on your stats and career history, you have a shot everywhere, and in short, it's the longest at Stanford and HBS, and yours to lose at Columbia (you have to screw up, which many do).
We're forgetting ECs/leadership/story, which HBS and Stanford obsess over, Wharton focuses on strongly, Booth has recently been obsessing over, and which Columbia doesn't consider much.
Pedigree is another story. They all like pedigree, but of these, Stanford is the one most likely to hold your UG against you. HBS is the most likely to hold your MM PE firm against you. Your IB should be fine (not harmful) at all of them.
You'll be fine as long as you don't screw up.
The truth is you're the weak. And I'm the tyranny of evil men. But I'm tryin', Ringo. I'm tryin' real hard to be the shepherd.
might want to reach out to a consultant who knows the trade and can guide you with essays
Who are the better consultants out there? I'm trying to get the lay of the land; is there a ranking, or a couple of generally accepted "top" mba admit consultants?
"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
might want to reach out to a consultant who knows the trade and can guide you with essays
Who are the better consultants out there? I'm trying to get the lay of the land; is there a ranking, or a couple of generally accepted "top" mba admit consultants?
In my personal opinion, the only ones worth the money are sandy "HBSguru" Kreisberg and Alex Chu. The others are pretty awful. If you have clear career goals and have b-school friends who can help with essays, that's a better way to go.
Ccolumbia is hard to get into and he could definitely screw it up, but if he executes solidly and knows what they're looking for (which a lot of people don't), I'd be very surprised if he didn't get in.
The truth is you're the weak. And I'm the tyranny of evil men. But I'm tryin', Ringo. I'm tryin' real hard to be the shepherd.
Exercitationem id magni unde placeat quaerat. Repudiandae enim deserunt rerum rerum. Ut molestias ullam natus nam. Quibusdam expedita non omnis dolor qui et.
Consequatur magnam fugit et velit mollitia. Earum sunt itaque et aut occaecati porro quia.
Consectetur ipsa fugit non possimus recusandae et id. Maxime beatae cupiditate quam ipsa quia sapiente. Doloremque magnam quod et quibusdam voluptates voluptatibus. Impedit et qui pariatur quo nostrum illo nesciunt quidem. Quia nesciunt est occaecati. Adipisci blanditiis earum in qui eos voluptatem voluptates temporibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Temporibus odit voluptatum et non nemo sed. Reiciendis accusamus ratione dolores consequatur perferendis. Facere dolorem vel odit eligendi eaque iure modi. Non rerum non quibusdam qui doloremque perspiciatis voluptatem. Sed qui iure et eveniet aut debitis id.
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
You're probably competitive for those if you have good leadership experience (ECs maybe) and execute on the essays. Wharton may or may not be a stretch but the other two are doable.
You basically have all of the boxes checked so you'll be competitive for any school if you can write decent essays and interview well. Good luck.
Regards
You look competitive. Need good recs
http://www.mbapredictor.com
[quote=tlynch5]http://www.mbapredictor.com[/quote]
This is BS. I know way too many 3.7s and 700+ GMATs who got rejected sight unseen at top schools. This does not take into account your essays or ECs or references etc. This might work for Med school or law school where admission decisions are number driven.
Everything looks good, solid work exp, good gpa and majors, solid GMAT. Any volunteer work? Are you a urm? Also curious, a MM a hair below evercore and Lazard?
I would post this inquiry in the MBAapply thread, Alex has great insight on these type of questions
Your resume is solid. As the above posters said, you're competitive at all the b-schools except HBS and Stanford. Just write awesome essays, get solid recs, and try to stand out. Don't discuss only work in your essays and make sure you come across as an interesting multi-dimensional person, rather than as a finance robot.
apply early-round at Columbia and sing praises for Columbia and how you've always wanted to go there. Just realize that if your admitted you'll have to plunk down some cash and "request" that you not be considerd for admittance at the other schools you applied to; admitance will occur before you hear back from the other schools. I know someone with similar stats - lower gpa, but higher GMAT, and lower-tier PE firm - that got in.
The OP is actually over-qualified for columbia ED. I know a lot of subpar people who got in because they knew they couldn't get in regular decision or the other M7 schools. IMO, the OP is competitive at wharton and booth and should not preclude his options by binding himself to columbia, unless of course he visits and absolutely falls in love with the school.
Dude, the MBA landscape is changing. There is no such thing as a shoo-in at the top schools. My advice was for the OP to improve his chances to get into Columbia because there are no guarantees.
Based on the limited information provided, my estimates are below. I know people with very, very similar profiles that applied last cycle, including myself.
H/S - Long Shot Wharton - Reach Chicago + Sloan + Kellogg - 50/50, maybe 40/60 (not in your favor) Columbia - Competitive
you will be competitive in all the top MBA schools. Good Luck :D
i agree with compbanker--hedge your bets and do ED
Based on your stats and career history, you have a shot everywhere, and in short, it's the longest at Stanford and HBS, and yours to lose at Columbia (you have to screw up, which many do).
We're forgetting ECs/leadership/story, which HBS and Stanford obsess over, Wharton focuses on strongly, Booth has recently been obsessing over, and which Columbia doesn't consider much.
Pedigree is another story. They all like pedigree, but of these, Stanford is the one most likely to hold your UG against you. HBS is the most likely to hold your MM PE firm against you. Your IB should be fine (not harmful) at all of them.
You'll be fine as long as you don't screw up.
might want to reach out to a consultant who knows the trade and can guide you with essays
Who are the better consultants out there? I'm trying to get the lay of the land; is there a ranking, or a couple of generally accepted "top" mba admit consultants?
In my personal opinion, the only ones worth the money are sandy "HBSguru" Kreisberg and Alex Chu. The others are pretty awful. If you have clear career goals and have b-school friends who can help with essays, that's a better way to go.
libor has a hard on for consultants :)
i dont know if id say columbia is his to lose but he has the good solid core stats for it yes. i wouldnt say its AS easy as 'his to lose'
Ccolumbia is hard to get into and he could definitely screw it up, but if he executes solidly and knows what they're looking for (which a lot of people don't), I'd be very surprised if he didn't get in.
yeah but thats kind of generic to say, no? 'if you have everything they want, youre going to get in' lol
When people mention EC's for bschool, do they mean from undergrad or things done during the first few years of work (or both)?
Both.
Both and generally in leadership/creating something or bringing change not just being a member
Exercitationem id magni unde placeat quaerat. Repudiandae enim deserunt rerum rerum. Ut molestias ullam natus nam. Quibusdam expedita non omnis dolor qui et.
Consequatur magnam fugit et velit mollitia. Earum sunt itaque et aut occaecati porro quia.
Consectetur ipsa fugit non possimus recusandae et id. Maxime beatae cupiditate quam ipsa quia sapiente. Doloremque magnam quod et quibusdam voluptates voluptatibus. Impedit et qui pariatur quo nostrum illo nesciunt quidem. Quia nesciunt est occaecati. Adipisci blanditiis earum in qui eos voluptatem voluptates temporibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Temporibus odit voluptatum et non nemo sed. Reiciendis accusamus ratione dolores consequatur perferendis. Facere dolorem vel odit eligendi eaque iure modi. Non rerum non quibusdam qui doloremque perspiciatis voluptatem. Sed qui iure et eveniet aut debitis id.