Investment Banking Company Statistics - As of September, 2026

These statistics are based solely on the user submissions to the WSO Company Database for employment during 2024, 2025, YTD 2026. Each company is given an adjusted score using Bayesian estimates, which takes into account the number of reviews for a particular company. For more details, please see the Methodology FAQ below.
Hardest Interviews (1) (2)
What bank has the hardest interview?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Centerview Partners
No
99.2%
Evercore
01
98.4%
Qatalyst Partners
02
97.6%
PJT Partners
02
96.9%
Moelis & Company
01
96.1%
Rothschild
02
95.3%
Lazard, Inc.
05
94.5%
Goldman Sachs
01
93.7%
Citigroup
07
92.9%
Agentis Capital
New
92.1%
LionTree Advisors
02
91.3%
Financial Technology Partners
03
90.6%
Morgan Stanley
06
89.8%
Eastdil Secured
No
89.0%
D.A. Davidson & Co
05
88.2%
Scotiabank
New
87.4%
Nomura Holdings
No
86.6%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
03
85.8%
Guggenheim Partners
01
85.0%
Perella Weinberg Partners
09
84.3%
William Blair
01
83.5%
CIBC World Markets
11
82.7%
Greenhill
New
81.9%
Deutsche Bank
04
81.1%
Livingstone Partners
New
80.3%
Ardea Partners
01
79.5%
Houlihan Lokey
07
78.7%
Tidal Partners
02
78.0%
Piper Sandler
New
77.2%
Berenson and Co
New
76.4%

Percentile calculated only based off of investment banks that received at least two interview insights (127 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Interview Experience (1) (2)
What bank has the best interview experience?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Harris Williams & Co.
No
99.2%
Solomon Partners
12
98.4%
Black Arch Partners
02
97.6%
Robert W. Baird & Co.
05
96.9%
Truist Securities
02
96.1%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
02
95.3%
Piper Sandler
05
94.5%
William Blair
10
93.7%
Wells Fargo and Company
02
92.9%
Mizuho
13
92.1%
RBC Capital Markets
01
91.3%
Ducera
New
90.6%
Lincoln International
05
89.8%
Capstone Partners
New
89.0%
Brown Gibbons Lang and Company
02
88.2%
Jefferies & Company
04
87.4%
TD Securities
11
86.6%
Houlihan Lokey
01
85.8%
Cantor Fitzgerald
New
85.0%
Stephens Inc
New
84.3%
Cascadia Capital LLC
09
83.5%
D.A. Davidson & Co
16
82.7%
Carlsquare
01
81.9%
Goldman Sachs
02
81.1%
PJT Partners
New
80.3%
Credit Agricole
11
79.5%
BMO Capital Markets
New
78.7%
Greenhill
21
78.0%
JPMorgan
No
77.2%
Guggenheim Partners
14
76.4%

Percentile calculated only based off of investment banks that received at least two interview insights (127 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Prepare for Your Investment Banking Interview

Professional Growth and Career Opportunities - 187 Investment Banks

Overall Employee Satisfaction (1) (2)
Overall how satisfied are you working for this company?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Moelis & Company
No
99.5%
Morgan Stanley
03
98.9%
Evercore
01
98.4%
Banco Santander
02
97.9%
BMO Capital Markets
12
97.3%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
06
96.8%
Goldman Sachs
04
96.3%
Houlihan Lokey
05
95.7%
JPMorgan
No
95.2%
Deutsche Bank
08
94.7%
Wells Fargo and Company
01
94.1%
Barclays
05
93.6%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
09
93.0%
UBS AG
08
92.5%
Lazard, Inc.
02
92.0%
Rothschild
13
91.4%
Lincoln International
09
90.9%
RBC Capital Markets
New
90.4%
Citigroup
No
89.8%
Guggenheim Partners
06
89.3%
BNP Paribas
No
88.8%
Nomura Holdings
New
88.2%
Lazard Freres
New
87.7%
Credit Agricole
04
87.2%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
New
86.6%
Société Générale
01
86.1%
Standard Chartered Bank
New
85.6%
Scotiabank
No
85.0%
Perella Weinberg Partners
14
84.5%
Solomon Partners
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Professional Growth Opportunities (1) (2)
Your opportunities for professional growth?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Evercore
01
99.5%
Moelis & Company
01
98.9%
Morgan Stanley
07
98.4%
Goldman Sachs
01
97.9%
JPMorgan
No
97.3%
BMO Capital Markets
11
96.8%
Houlihan Lokey
03
96.3%
Guggenheim Partners
01
95.7%
Deutsche Bank
06
95.2%
Lincoln International
04
94.7%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
03
94.1%
Piper Sandler
01
93.6%
Barclays
02
93.0%
Citigroup
05
92.5%
Wells Fargo and Company
03
92.0%
BNP Paribas
No
91.4%
Rothschild
02
90.9%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
06
90.4%
UBS AG
04
89.8%
Lazard, Inc.
12
89.3%
William Blair
03
88.8%
Banco Santander
05
88.2%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
New
87.7%
RBC Capital Markets
04
87.2%
Nomura Holdings
New
86.6%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
06
86.1%
Scotiabank
New
85.6%
Lazard Freres
New
85.0%
National Bank of Canada
01
84.5%
Société Générale
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Career Advancement Opportunities (1) (2)
Your opportunities for career advancement?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Evercore
01
99.5%
Moelis & Company
01
98.9%
JPMorgan
01
98.4%
Goldman Sachs
01
97.9%
Morgan Stanley
07
97.3%
Guggenheim Partners
No
96.8%
BMO Capital Markets
11
96.3%
Houlihan Lokey
03
95.7%
Citigroup
02
95.2%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
03
94.7%
Lincoln International
01
94.1%
Barclays
04
93.6%
BNP Paribas
04
93.0%
Wells Fargo and Company
01
92.5%
Deutsche Bank
06
92.0%
Lazard, Inc.
07
91.4%
Rothschild
05
90.9%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
02
90.4%
Piper Sandler
01
89.8%
Perella Weinberg Partners
09
89.3%
UBS AG
05
88.8%
William Blair
08
88.2%
Nomura Holdings
No
87.7%
Banco Santander
New
87.2%
RBC Capital Markets
03
86.6%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
01
86.1%
HSBC
02
85.6%
Lazard Freres
New
85.0%
Harris Williams & Co.
05
84.5%
Scotiabank
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Intern Offer Rates (1)
Average percentage of interns receiving full time offers
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
ThinkEquity Partners
01
100.0%
Candlewood Partners
New
100.0%
Ducera
01
93.3%
PMCF
10
90.0%
Cowen Group
14
90.0%
MTS Health Partners
02
90.0%
Davidson Companies
02
90.0%
Tudor Pickering Holt and Co
08
90.0%
Caixa-Banco de Investimento SA
01
90.0%
Peter J Solomon
New
90.0%
Nomura Securities
New
90.0%
Evercore
01
88.9%
PJT Partners
10
86.7%
Moelis & Company
02
85.0%
National Bank Financial Group
New
85.0%
Solomon Partners
New
85.0%
Barclays
New
84.0%
Scotiabank
New
83.3%
AGC Partners
02
83.3%
Wells Fargo and Company
02
81.6%
Guggenheim Partners
01
81.0%
The Sage Group
No
80.0%
Bowen Advisors
16
80.0%
RBS Royal Bank of Scotland
New
80.0%
Standard Chartered Bank
New
80.0%

Simple average based off of investment banks that received at least one intern offer data point (135 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Promotions and Fairness - 187 Investment Banks

Feedback (1) (2)
Feedback you receive about your job performance?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Moelis & Company
07
99.5%
Morgan Stanley
08
98.9%
Guggenheim Partners
02
98.4%
Goldman Sachs
05
97.9%
JPMorgan
02
97.3%
Wells Fargo and Company
03
96.8%
BNP Paribas
05
96.3%
Nomura Holdings
05
95.7%
UBS AG
17
95.2%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
08
94.7%
Houlihan Lokey
06
94.1%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
06
93.6%
Evercore
01
93.0%
Scotiabank
14
92.5%
BMO Capital Markets
No
92.0%
HSBC
12
91.4%
Société Génrale CIB
No
90.9%
Deutsche Bank
11
90.4%
William Blair
02
89.8%
TD Securities
02
89.3%
Barclays
10
88.8%
RBC Capital Markets
01
88.2%
B. Riley & Co.
New
87.7%
Lazard, Inc.
03
87.2%
Truist Securities
New
86.6%
Lincoln International
06
86.1%
Perella Weinberg Partners
03
85.6%
Citigroup
09
85.0%
Société Générale
New
84.5%
Piper Sandler
05
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Recognition (1) (2)
Recognition and praise you receive when you do a good job?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Moelis & Company
09
99.5%
Morgan Stanley
10
98.9%
Wells Fargo and Company
01
98.4%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
11
97.9%
BNP Paribas
01
97.3%
UBS AG
10
96.8%
JPMorgan
10
96.3%
Evercore
05
95.7%
Goldman Sachs
10
95.2%
Guggenheim Partners
06
94.7%
BMO Capital Markets
07
94.1%
HSBC
09
93.6%
Nomura Holdings
09
93.0%
Houlihan Lokey
07
92.5%
Barclays
14
92.0%
Deutsche Bank
09
91.4%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
09
90.9%
Lincoln International
07
90.4%
Société Générale
05
89.8%
Credit Agricole
03
89.3%
TD Securities
No
88.8%
Société Génrale CIB
08
88.2%
Lazard, Inc.
03
87.7%
Piper Sandler
04
87.2%
RBC Capital Markets
New
86.6%
Banco Santander
03
86.1%
Scotiabank
New
85.6%
B. Riley & Co.
New
85.0%
Citigroup
09
84.5%
Mizuho
25
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Most Fair (1) (2)
Fairness in how promotions are given and people are treated?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Moelis & Company
No
99.5%
Evercore
06
98.9%
Guggenheim Partners
No
98.4%
Goldman Sachs
07
97.9%
Barclays
03
97.3%
Nomura Holdings
14
96.8%
Morgan Stanley
20
96.3%
Wells Fargo and Company
04
95.7%
BNP Paribas
05
95.2%
BMO Capital Markets
05
94.7%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
08
94.1%
Deutsche Bank
05
93.6%
UBS AG
11
93.0%
JPMorgan
08
92.5%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
06
92.0%
Lincoln International
11
91.4%
Houlihan Lokey
05
90.9%
William Blair
08
90.4%
TD Securities
10
89.8%
Mizuho
04
89.3%
Harris Williams & Co.
08
88.8%
Truist Securities
New
88.2%
Lazard, Inc.
New
87.7%
Scotiabank
06
87.2%
Citigroup
New
86.6%
RBC Capital Markets
New
86.1%
Credit Agricole
New
85.6%
Perella Weinberg Partners
21
85.0%
Solomon Partners
New
84.5%
Banco Santander
02
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

All Company Specific Reviews Available

Compensation - 187 Investment Banks

Best Pay (1) (2)
Your compensation compared with similar jobs elsewhere?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Evercore
03
99.5%
Guggenheim Partners
01
98.9%
Moelis & Company
01
98.4%
Wells Fargo and Company
01
97.9%
Banco Santander
16
97.3%
Nomura Holdings
01
96.8%
JPMorgan
04
96.3%
Morgan Stanley
14
95.7%
Citigroup
02
95.2%
BMO Capital Markets
10
94.7%
Barclays
01
94.1%
TD Securities
06
93.6%
Goldman Sachs
02
93.0%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
03
92.5%
RBC Capital Markets
New
92.0%
Perella Weinberg Partners
06
91.4%
Lazard, Inc.
01
90.9%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
02
90.4%
Scotiabank
05
89.8%
BNP Paribas
07
89.3%
Rothschild
08
88.8%
UBS AG
07
88.2%
Harris Williams & Co.
14
87.7%
Houlihan Lokey
05
87.2%
PJT Partners
02
86.6%
DC Advisory
New
86.1%
Deutsche Bank
03
85.6%
HSBC
02
85.0%
Lazard Freres
04
84.5%
Société Génrale CIB
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Senior Management - 187 Investment Banks

Best Communication (1) (2)
Communications from management about important issues and changes?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Moelis & Company
No
99.5%
Morgan Stanley
03
98.9%
Evercore
01
98.4%
Barclays
02
97.9%
Guggenheim Partners
01
97.3%
Goldman Sachs
08
96.8%
Lazard, Inc.
No
96.3%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
08
95.7%
Houlihan Lokey
No
95.2%
JPMorgan
01
94.7%
Wells Fargo and Company
03
94.1%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
09
93.6%
BMO Capital Markets
02
93.0%
Scotiabank
10
92.5%
DC Advisory
New
92.0%
Deutsche Bank
03
91.4%
Nomura Holdings
09
90.9%
BNP Paribas
06
90.4%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
06
89.8%
UBS AG
01
89.3%
Piper Sandler
03
88.8%
TD Securities
12
88.2%
Lazard Freres
New
87.7%
Banco Santander
06
87.2%
Lincoln International
08
86.6%
Citigroup
New
86.1%
HSBC
05
85.6%
National Bank of Canada
No
85.0%
Solomon Partners
New
84.5%
Truist Securities
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Teamwork (1) (2)
Information and knowledge sharing withing company?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Morgan Stanley
No
99.5%
Moelis & Company
No
98.9%
Goldman Sachs
No
98.4%
JPMorgan
08
97.9%
Barclays
01
97.3%
Evercore
No
96.8%
BMO Capital Markets
02
96.3%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
08
95.7%
Wells Fargo and Company
No
95.2%
Houlihan Lokey
03
94.7%
Lazard, Inc.
03
94.1%
Deutsche Bank
08
93.6%
BNP Paribas
02
93.0%
HSBC
04
92.5%
Lincoln International
01
92.0%
Piper Sandler
06
91.4%
Guggenheim Partners
01
90.9%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
New
90.4%
Harris Williams & Co.
12
89.8%
Citigroup
01
89.3%
UBS AG
02
88.8%
Rothschild
01
88.2%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
06
87.7%
Nomura Holdings
New
87.2%
Banco Santander
No
86.6%
Scotiabank
02
86.1%
Lazard Freres
New
85.6%
Perella Weinberg Partners
02
85.0%
Truist Securities
New
84.5%
Eastdil Secured
04
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Leadership (1) (2)
Leadership abilities of senior management?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Moelis & Company
No
99.5%
Evercore
01
98.9%
Guggenheim Partners
01
98.4%
Lazard, Inc.
No
97.9%
Wells Fargo and Company
06
97.3%
Goldman Sachs
01
96.8%
Morgan Stanley
07
96.3%
JPMorgan
05
95.7%
Houlihan Lokey
01
95.2%
UBS AG
06
94.7%
Piper Sandler
02
94.1%
BMO Capital Markets
12
93.6%
Deutsche Bank
04
93.0%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
07
92.5%
BNP Paribas
03
92.0%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
10
91.4%
Barclays
05
90.9%
Harris Williams & Co.
12
90.4%
Banco Santander
11
89.8%
Lincoln International
05
89.3%
Solomon Partners
New
88.8%
Société Générale
07
88.2%
Nomura Holdings
New
87.7%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
New
87.2%
HSBC
06
86.6%
Citigroup
03
86.1%
RBC Capital Markets
New
85.6%
Rothschild
New
85.0%
Eastdil Secured
New
84.5%
Lazard Freres
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Competence (1) (2)
Competence of senior management?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Moelis & Company
No
99.5%
Morgan Stanley
02
98.9%
Wells Fargo and Company
07
98.4%
Evercore
02
97.9%
Goldman Sachs
01
97.3%
Houlihan Lokey
03
96.8%
JPMorgan
No
96.3%
Lazard, Inc.
No
95.7%
BMO Capital Markets
16
95.2%
Banco Santander
01
94.7%
Lazard Freres
10
94.1%
Deutsche Bank
06
93.6%
Piper Sandler
08
93.0%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
No
92.5%
Guggenheim Partners
04
92.0%
UBS AG
03
91.4%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
10
90.9%
BNP Paribas
02
90.4%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
New
89.8%
Barclays
05
89.3%
Lincoln International
09
88.8%
Harris Williams & Co.
09
88.2%
Rothschild
New
87.7%
Nomura Holdings
New
87.2%
Credit Agricole
01
86.6%
Société Générale
03
86.1%
RBC Capital Markets
New
85.6%
TD Securities
06
85.0%
Truist Securities
New
84.5%
Scotiabank
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Thousands of Interview Questions Available by Firm

Reputation - 187 Investment Banks

Proudest Employees (1) (2)
Company as a place you are proud to work?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Moelis & Company
No
99.5%
Goldman Sachs
No
98.9%
Morgan Stanley
02
98.4%
JPMorgan
01
97.9%
Evercore
01
97.3%
Rothschild
02
96.8%
Guggenheim Partners
No
96.3%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
02
95.7%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
05
95.2%
BMO Capital Markets
16
94.7%
BNP Paribas
No
94.1%
Barclays
No
93.6%
Deutsche Bank
02
93.0%
Houlihan Lokey
04
92.5%
Wells Fargo and Company
10
92.0%
Banco Santander
02
91.4%
Lazard Freres
New
90.9%
Perella Weinberg Partners
09
90.4%
RBC Capital Markets
01
89.8%
Nomura Holdings
09
89.3%
Lazard, Inc.
08
88.8%
UBS AG
08
88.2%
Citigroup
No
87.7%
Credit Agricole
03
87.2%
Piper Sandler
04
86.6%
Raymond James Financial Inc.
New
86.1%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
03
85.6%
Lincoln International
09
85.0%
National Bank of Canada
New
84.5%
PJT Partners
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Life Style - 187 Investment Banks

Time Off (1) (2)
Management support for needed time off?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Houlihan Lokey
07
99.5%
Wells Fargo and Company
03
98.9%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
No
98.4%
JPMorgan
07
97.9%
HSBC
04
97.3%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
13
96.8%
BNP Paribas
05
96.3%
Moelis & Company
08
95.7%
Credit Agricole
03
95.2%
BMO Capital Markets
No
94.7%
Deutsche Bank
04
94.1%
Lincoln International
03
93.6%
Evercore
04
93.0%
Barclays
01
92.5%
TD Securities
11
92.0%
Banco Santander
04
91.4%
Morgan Stanley
11
90.9%
Goldman Sachs
New
90.4%
Société Générale
05
89.8%
Société Génrale CIB
New
89.3%
Lazard, Inc.
03
88.8%
Guggenheim Partners
02
88.2%
UBS AG
New
87.7%
Piper Sandler
06
87.2%
Perella Weinberg Partners
02
86.6%
Solomon Partners
New
86.1%
Nomura Holdings
02
85.6%
Citigroup
05
85.0%
DC Advisory
New
84.5%
Standard Chartered Bank
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Best Work/Life Balance (1) (2)
Employer support in balancing between work life and personal life?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Barclays
03
99.5%
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
08
98.9%
RBC Royal Bank of Canada
02
98.4%
Wells Fargo and Company
01
97.9%
BNP Paribas
03
97.3%
Houlihan Lokey
05
96.8%
JPMorgan
15
96.3%
HSBC
06
95.7%
Credit Agricole
03
95.2%
Piper Sandler
03
94.7%
Moelis & Company
New
94.1%
Société Génrale CIB
No
93.6%
Standard Chartered Bank
06
93.0%
Deutsche Bank
No
92.5%
Société Générale
06
92.0%
BMO Capital Markets
05
91.4%
Lincoln International
01
90.9%
TD Securities
11
90.4%
Macquarie Group Limited ABN
05
89.8%
DC Advisory
New
89.3%
Citigroup
New
88.8%
Nomura Holdings
New
88.2%
Evercore
New
87.7%
Scotiabank
06
87.2%
Goldman Sachs
New
86.6%
Morgan Stanley
New
86.1%
Mizuho
22
85.6%
B. Riley & Co.
New
85.0%
Lazard, Inc.
06
84.5%
MUFG
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Worst Work/Life Balance (1) (2)
Employer support in balancing between work life and personal life?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Edgemont Capital Partners
03
99.5%
IMAP MB Partners
01
98.9%
Credit Suisse
New
98.4%
Concord Partners
02
97.9%
Atlas Technology Group
No
97.3%
GF Securities
06
96.8%
Bourne Partners
02
96.3%
Candlewood Partners
02
95.7%
AZ Capital
02
95.2%
Arma Partners
New
94.7%
The Vant Group
06
94.1%
Kotak Mahindra Capital Company
06
93.6%
Black Arch Partners
06
93.0%
EC Mergers and Acquisitions
06
92.5%
Woodside Capital Partners
07
92.0%
Cantor Fitzgerald
New
91.4%
Hyde Park Capital
08
90.9%
Coronation Merchant Bank
New
90.4%
CastleOak Securities
New
89.8%
Financiére Cambon
10
89.3%
Genesis Capital
New
88.8%
PJ SOLOMON
New
88.2%
Imperial Capital
New
87.7%
Bryan Garnier and Co
New
87.2%
Craig Hallum
New
86.6%
Peakstone Group
New
86.1%
Cowen Group
New
85.6%
Takenaka Partners
New
85.0%
Clairfield International
New
84.5%
The Opes Group
New
84.0%

Percentile calculated based off of adjusted score only for investment banks that received at least one vote (187 total firms). See Methodology FAQ below for more information.

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Most Average Hours Worked (1)
How many hours do you work an average?
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
GP Bullhound
01
90.0
PEI Global Partners
01
90.0
Union Square Advisors
02
86.7
LionTree Advisors
01
85.0
National Bank Financial Markets
10
85.0
Arma Partners
06
83.3
Moelis & Company
01
80.9
Robert W. Baird & Co.
New
80.8
Crosstree Capital Partners
02
80.0
Peter J Solomon
New
80.0
Perella Weinberg Partners
02
79.4
Alantra
New
78.8
Ducera
04
78.3
Financial Technology Partners
08
78.3
Jefferies & Company
04
78.3
Lazard, Inc.
03
77.9
Rothschild
03
77.7
Lazard Freres
03
77.5
AGC Partners
03
77.0
Carlsquare
06
77.0
Morgan Stanley
03
76.9
Evercore
08
76.8
EC Mergers and Acquisitions
06
76.7
Mediobanca
New
76.3
Stifel Nicolaus and Company, Inc
New
75.8
William Blair
02
75.7
PJT Partners
New
75.6
Raymond James Financial Inc.
New
75.0
Duff & Phelps
New
75.0
Berkshire Global Advisors
06
75.0

Only includes investment banks that received at least three submissions with hourly data (118 total firms).

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Thousands of Interview Questions Available by Firm

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.