Novation

It is the replacement of one of the parties in a two-party agreement with the consent of the other two parties

Author: Adin Lykken
Adin Lykken
Adin Lykken
Consulting | Private Equity

Currently, Adin is an associate at Berkshire Partners, an $16B middle-market private equity fund. Prior to joining Berkshire Partners, Adin worked for just over three years at The Boston Consulting Group as an associate and consultant and previously interned for the Federal Reserve Board and the U.S. Senate.

Adin graduated from Yale University, Magna Cum Claude, with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Economics.

Reviewed By: Patrick Curtis
Patrick Curtis
Patrick Curtis
Private Equity | Investment Banking

Prior to becoming our CEO & Founder at Wall Street Oasis, Patrick spent three years as a Private Equity Associate for Tailwind Capital in New York and two years as an Investment Banking Analyst at Rothschild.

Patrick has an MBA in Entrepreneurial Management from The Wharton School and a BA in Economics from Williams College.

Last Updated:November 27, 2023

What is Novation?

It is the replacement of one of the parties in a two-party agreement with the consent of the other two parties. To novate is to take on a new commitment instead of an old one. For instance, a supplier looking to part ways with a commercial client may identify a replacement. 

The contract may be annulled and changed, except for the supplier's name, if all the parties concur. All rights and duties under the agreement are transferred to the new provider by the outgoing supplier.

How Novation Works

To novate is to take on a new commitment instead of an old one. According to contract law, it replaces one of the parties in a two-party contract with a third party, with the consent of all the parties involved. The first contract is invalid in a novate. 

The first contract is still in effect, with the original party retaining the final responsibility in the assignment. So it is in the financial markets refers to the employment of a clearinghouse to examine a transaction between two parties.

According to legal terminology, a contract's "benefits and liabilities" are transferred to a new party. 3 The advantages might include payments. The commitments assumed in exchange for the payment are referred to as burdens. 

One of the contract's parties is prepared to give up the obligations and forego the rewards. Contract cancellation may be troublesome, costly, and damaging to the company's reputation. 

It is better to arrange for a third party to carry out the contract on the same conditions, with consent from all parties. In the construction sector, where subcontractors may be managing numerous tasks at once, novations are frequently observed. 

With the client's permission, contractors may assign work to other contractors. The most typical occasion is when a company is bought or sold. The new owner wants to keep the business's contractual commitments. 

The other signatories desire the uninterrupted performance of their contracts. These facilitate the change.

Example of Novation

Some of the examples are:

Example 1

It is possible to novate two contracts. For instance, if one states that Dan will give Alex a TV and the other states that Alex will give Becky a TV, the replacement contract says that Dan will provide Becky with a TV. Unlike an assignment, which only needs one party's approval, novation requires all parties. 

Although consideration for the new contract is still necessary, it is typically taken for granted that the old contract has been discharged.

Another well-known instance is when Company A enters into a contract with Company B and includes a novation clause to ensure that if Company B sells, merges, or transfers most of its operations to another business, the new business will take over.

This takeover of obligations and liabilities will be under the contract with Company A. According to the provisions of the agreement, a buyer, merging party, or transferee of Company B thereby assumes Company B's responsibilities to Company A.

As an alternative, in the case of such a modification, a "novation agreement" may be negotiated following the first contract. Contracts involving governmental institutions sometimes contain clauses like this. 

For instance, the United States Anti-Assignment Act stipulates that the governmental body that first issued the contract must consent to a transfer for the agreement to remain in effect.

The obligee's acceptance of the new debtor, the new debtor's acceptance of the debtor's obligation, and the old debtor's acceptance of the new contract as complete execution of the old contract are the requirements.

Because it is not a unilateral contracting mechanism, there is a possibility for dialogue over the revised T&Cs in light of the altered situation. 

Therefore, "acceptance of the new contract as complete fulfillment of the old contract" can be understood as the occurrence of "mutual agreement of the T&Cs."

Example 2

John paid $5,000 for a car from Peter on credit, intending to pay it off in a year. John receives a medical emergency before he delivers the first monthly installment and requires quick cash to pay the cost. 

John decides to sell Mary the automobile on the same terms as Peter. John wants to get out of the deal but owes Peter and Mary money. John thus seeks to get Peter and Mary to commit to it to pay off his debt. 

By agreeing to the terms of its agreement, the parties are making a legal commitment to one another. Mary will now be responsible for paying off John's debts to Peter. 

The repayment schedule may be altered following the agreement as both parties accept the modified conditions. In the real estate industry, it can also take place when a tenant transfers the lease tenure on a building to a third party. 

The lease agreement is transferred from the tenant to the other party, who then assumes responsibility for lease payments, property damage repairs, and other duties outlined in the original lease agreement. 

The parties to the agreement are free to stick with the original leasing contract or try to agree on its parameters through negotiation.

Types of Novations

It is a legal procedure that serves a dual purpose by putting one obligation to rest and establishing a new one. It functions as a relative extinction rather than an absolute one.

1. As the source

  • Legal: occurs as a result of the law.
  • Conventional: occurs as a result of an agreement between the parties.

2. In shape

  • Express: when it is stated.
  • Implied: when the previous and new duties are wholly incompatible.

In California Bus Line v. State Investment, the Supreme Court ruled that only evidence of incompatibility between the old and new duty would justify it by implication in the absence of a clear-cut pronouncement of the extinguishment of the pre-existing obligation. 

Additionally, the incompatibility test determines whether or not the two duties can coexist, each having a separate existence. If they are not compatible, the second requirement supersedes the first. The Supreme Court ruled in Quinto v. 

For it to be compatible and void the original obligation, the alteration must affect one of the duty's key components, such as its goal, cause, or main conditions. If not, the change would only be modificatory in character.

3. Concerning

  • Fundamental/objective: when the obligation's goal, cause (consideration), our primary conditions are altered;
  • Personal/subjective: when a third party assumes the debtor's place and when the debtor's person is substituted;
  • Mixed: when the debtor, creditor, or both parties are altered together with the obligation's primary condition or object. It combines genuine and individual innovations. 

4. According to the result

  • Total: when the previous commitment is entirely canceled.
  • Partial: when the previous responsibility is only slightly altered, the modification is only ancillary to the primary obligation.

5. Standard: A standard is an agreement between both parties in which new clauses are added to an existing contract to create a new one.

6. Expromissio: When three parties—the transferor, transferee, and counterparty—are engaged in the transfer of rights, all of the parties must concur on new contract conditions before the transfer may proceed.

7. Delegation: Delegation occurs when a new creditor assumes the legal obligations and advantages of an existing creditor, relieving the original debtor of their debts to the first creditor and tying the new party to the first party's obligations.

Novation vs. Assignment

One party's rights and duties under a contract are transferred to another party through an assignment agreement. The assignor is the party transferring the rights and obligations; the assignee is the party receiving them. 

With the approval of the original counterparty, novation is a procedure whereby one party transfers all of its rights and duties under a contract to a third party.

Novation or assignment may add a new party to a contractual real estate arrangement. It establishes a new contract by transferring one party's legal duties and responsibilities to another. 

The responsibilities of the original contract stay with the original party; the assignment merely transfers the rights and benefits to the assignee.

The transferor, or assignor, is nevertheless held legally liable for the contract's provisions. Assignments often occur in real estate when a tenant sublets a leased property to a different party. It needs a third party's consent, although a project does not.

If the assignee fails to perform its obligations under the contract, the assignor will continue to bear the burden and may be held accountable. However, a future responsibility for the assignor can be lessened if the assignee sells them an indemnification clause. 

Contrary to notes, assignment contracts do not revoke the original agreement or create a new one. The original or first contract is still in effect.

In most cases, assignment contracts can be assigned without the consent of all parties to the agreement. However, depending on the terms, the assignor will usually need to inform the non-assigning party.

It happens when one party wants to assign another party the obligations and benefits of a contract. The advantages are passed similarly to the assignment; however, unlike work, the load is transferred. 

The previous contract is replaced with the new one when it is complete. A third party now holds the duties and rights under this new contract.

Although it is possible to novate them, novation does not nullify any previous responsibilities or rights under the first contract. The original contract's parties and the newly joined third party must agree to novation. 

Unless the novation is stated in a deed signed by all parties to the contract, some form of compensation must also be specified in the new contract for it to be novated. Consideration in this context refers to something of the value obtained as a result of the deal.

Novation in finance and investing

In investing, it is most often associated with the derivatives market, where investors trade other financial investments that are related to stocks or that are 

I am related to hedging against potential losses in the stock market rather than actual stocks, such as default credit swaps, options, or futures.

However, the fundamental idea is the same when three parties voluntarily join a new contract, as when someone transfers securities to a clearinghouse, which subsequently transfers them to a third party.

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association plays a guiding role in standardizing and modernizing its investment protocols, most recently for the digital age. 

Under pressure from regulators, it issued a significant revision in 2005, defining the kind of documentation necessary for the full consent of all three parties to make the new contract legally binding.

Its contracts are also banking, typically when a lender wishes to transfer a loan to another lender.

In summary, contracts are used when one party removes themselves from a contract, assuming their obligations and benefits from a third party. 

A new agreement is drawn to remove the original party and replace them with the third party. The consent of all three parties is required, and the new deal must abide by the protocols defined by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.

This arrangement describes how owners of securities transfer those securities to a clearinghouse, which subsequently sells the transferred securities to customers.

In this transaction, the clearinghouse serves as a mediator and takes on the counterparty risk associated with one party's obligation default.

Because market participants do not have to determine the other party's creditworthiness in the transaction, this type streamlines the procedure for them. 

Participants have to worry about the improbable possibility of the clearinghouse going bankrupt, which is not regarded as a credit risk.

A seller may transfer the rights and liabilities of a derivative to another party in it without a clearinghouse. One contractual party may delegate its responsibilities to another party in markets without a centralized clearing system, such as swap trading.

Researched and authored by Fatemah Kamali | LinkedIn

Free Resources:

To continue learning and advancing your career, check out these additional helpful WSO resources: