The US Education System and Why We're Behind
Regardless of which political affiliation you adhere to in this great country, one fact remains that is almost universally agreed upon from the streets of NYC to the deserts of New Mexico: our education system sucks at the primary and secondary levels.
Chicago-schoolers call for vouchers, others call for increased funding to impoverished areas, and still others call for complete privatization of education, but the boogeyman still looms of us not doing the best job we can do to prepare people through school.
One blogger for the Harvard Business Review doesn't attribute the problem wholly to disparate socioeconomic levels, but instead to the dramatically different degrees of technological pervasiveness that are faced by children inside and outside the classroom.
You can read the full article here.
I will agree that, as a 23 year-old now, high school was most likely dramatically different when I was going through it than it is today. The fact of the matter is that no one had smartphones, fewer people were constantly connected to one another through Facebook, and though the internet still played a pretty large role in our lives, I wouldn't consider it to be preponderant.
Now, on the other hand, kids in middle school have smartphones and access to essentially infinite information 24/7, and I can see how this could greatly disrupt the almost draconian perception that the "teacher is always right" and is the voice of reason and authority between the hours of 8am and 3:30pm. This, coupled with the fact that the people I know who became primary and secondary educators post-college were academically unimpressive, leads me to agree with the author's points that the traditional method of teaching kids is starting to become dated.
Where I live, for example (in the Dirty South, famous for terrible education), a greater number of school systems are implementing online coursework for kids in high school. Some of these kids only have to go to the classroom for tests -- akin to distance education at the college or even graduate level -- and are free to work on their own schedules throughout the day. I'm not sure this is the approach to take, and might only work for students who have already demonstrated high achievement and self-discipline, but I do think it is at least a step in the right direction.
But the author also suggests that we dilute the prototypical public school curriculum of math, science, social studies, and english courses in favor of classes that kids want to take (the author claiming that these courses include computer science, business, and other marketable disciplines). To what degree can this be diluted before kids really do begin to no longer be "well-rounded"? I have always been of the belief that, in college, everyone should have to take courses in the liberal arts (i.e. through a core curriculum) because those courses teach us to think critically and abstractly about many different problems and questions -- I think this applies to a degree to primary and secondary education too. What do you guys think?
What do you all make of all this? Transition the classroom to the interwebs, or keep it old-fashioned and force up those artificially high ADHD rates? No but seriously, why does everyone have ADHD now?
Thanks for reading.






Comments
This is ridiculous. To fix
This is ridiculous. To fix American schools you've got to pay teachers a competitive wage (which doesn't mean just a raise, I mean competition) and force students to be in school ALL YEAR 'ROUND, particularly in disadvantaged areas where going home means exposure to drugs, gang-bangers and other illicit activities.
I think the other problem
I think the other problem besides the fact that the pay is the biggest deterrant for teachers is that our education system is geared for the SLOWEST kid in the classroom. I think this is the biggest thing that has to be changed. I used to get in trouble all the time in grade school because I grasped everything immediately and the teacher had to spend 30 of the remaining 45 minutes of time teaching everyone else. I'd get bored and cause trouble. I used to even finish the tests of the kids next to me so I'd have someone to play with, so to speak.
The structure needs to change, but I have no idea how to do it or even how to suggest it.
tyrets: I think the other
I think the other problem besides the fact that the pay is the biggest deterrant for teachers is that our education system is geared for the SLOWEST kid in the classroom. I think this is the biggest thing that has to be changed. I used to get in trouble all the time in grade school because I grasped everything immediately and the teacher had to spend 30 of the remaining 45 minutes of time teaching everyone else. I'd get bored and cause trouble. I used to even finish the tests of the kids next to me so I'd have someone to play with, so to speak.
The structure needs to change, but I have no idea how to do it or even how to suggest it.
yep. having tailored curricula would solve this problem and FAST.
For better students, you need
For better students, you need better parents.
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
SirTradesaLot: For better
For better students, you need better parents.
I hate victims who respect their executioners
Follow BH & Co. on Twitter: @DumbLuckCapital
twitter.com/DumbLuckCapital
SirTradesaLot: For better
For better students, you need better parents.
No that's wrong (unless you are referring to genetics, in which case yes, you're right, intelligence is hereditary).
For our education system to be fair you need a system that to the greatest extend possible transcends bad parenting (or good parenting) or rather any disadvantage not related to intellect for that matter. School all day, required extracurricular or extra help. This also relates to pay; as it stands you cannot support equal pay for someone who works only 1/2 a year and 6 hours a day.
Last time I checked, teaching
Last time I checked, teaching is a public service. Ironically enough, these teachers are more concerned about their pensions than the long term well being of the students.
Here to learn and hopefully pass on some knowledge as well. SB if I helped.
the system is in its current
the system is in its current shape because americans spend on education like they do on everything else: like cheapskate assholes who want quality but don't want to pay for it, and then piss and bitch about it. like the average moron complaining about the shitty quality of their chicom-made walmart crap, but then they refuse to pay a few dollars more for a product made by their neighbors right here in america.
you get what you pay for, assholes. that's an iron law of life.
If the parents don't care
If the parents don't care about the student's progress, all other efforts will largely be wasted.
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
BlackHat: SirTradesaLot: Fo
For better students, you need better parents.
The chicken or the egg? Which do we fix first.
All American
For better students, you need better parents.
The chicken or the egg? Which do we fix first.
what's so chicken/egg about this? of course you fix the parents to fix the kids. how does fixing the kids fix the parents?
melvvvar: the system is in
the system is in its current shape because americans spend on education like they do on everything else: like cheapskate assholes who want quality but don't want to pay for it, and then piss and bitch about it. like the average moron complaining about the shitty quality of their chicom-made walmart crap, but then they refuse to pay a few dollars more for a product made by their neighbors right here in america.
you get what you pay for, assholes. that's an iron law of life.
We have been paying exponentially more and our quality has not improved. We've tried throwing money at the problem and it isn't working.
All American
the system is in its current shape because americans spend on education like they do on everything else: like cheapskate assholes who want quality but don't want to pay for it, and then piss and bitch about it. like the average moron complaining about the shitty quality of their chicom-made walmart crap, but then they refuse to pay a few dollars more for a product made by their neighbors right here in america.
you get what you pay for, assholes. that's an iron law of life.
We have been paying exponentially more and our quality has not improved. We've tried throwing money at the problem and it isn't working.
agreed. but we have been feeding the tail and not the tooth. all that money has been dumped on administrators and equ,ipment, when what you need are good teachers. triple their salaries and you will attract better brains.
the other part of "spending" is parents spending time disciplining their little bastards before dumping them on the system. you can't teach when your little fucker is so much of an ADHD disruptive cocksucker that he destroys the learning environment for everyone else.
That_Aston: Last time I
Last time I checked, teaching is a public service. Ironically enough, these teachers are more concerned about their pensions than the long term well being of the students.
That attitude is probably a strong contributor to why teaching attracts the lowest competency talent. Teaching is an investment into a nation's economic and political stability. The teaching profession should be incentivized to attract the best and brightest - lots of latitude in lesson planning and day-to-day execution, high entry level salaries, better defined performance metrics.
melvvvar: All American
For better students, you need better parents.
The chicken or the egg? Which do we fix first.
what's so chicken/egg about this? of course you fix the parents to fix the kids. how does fixing the kids fix the parents?
They become tomorrows shitty parents obviously, sometimes while still in highschool. Given that the parents are already established, you're less likely to change their parenting styles now.
All American
OP: I don't think you know
melvvvar: All American
Financial Modeling Training
Guide to Finance Interviews
Banking Resume
You can lead a horse to
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
There needs to be a
TNA: You can lead a horse to
Vontropnats: Regardless of
Contact: [email protected]
See my other blog posts
the problem is that we are
SirTradesaLot: For better
.
The Department of Education
KozzAndEffect: There needs to
Here to learn and hopefully pass on some knowledge as well. SB if I helped.
the fact that teachers arent
And I think it's gonna be a long, long, time
I think you just need magnet
Frankly, the biggest problem
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
I honestly believe teachers
mperit01: I honestly believe
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
Here is an interesting idea.
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
My gf is a teacher at a bad
I'm not sure if this has been
“We are buried beneath the weight of information, which is being confused with knowledge; quantity is being confused with abundance and wealth with happiness. We are monkeys with money and guns.”
adapt or die: they allocated
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
TNA: Here is an interesting
But Rhaegar fought valiantly, Rhaegar fought nobly, Rhaegar fought bravely.
And Rhaegar died.
adapt or die: The best and
Anomanderis: TNA: Here is
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
TNA: I am of the mindset that
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
SirTradesaLot: TNA: I am of
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
Am I alone in thinking
TNA: SirTradesaLot: TNA:
Mr. Hansen: Am I alone in
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
for better students, you need
SirTradesaLot: TNA: I am of
I've always believed in $
Suck my black ****.
You know what is cheaper than
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
Side note. Anyone read
MSF Website
MACC Website
MSF Twitter
TNA: You know what is cheaper
And I think it's gonna be a long, long, time