An/Aso obsolescence — is it happening now?
Over the past MONTH I’ve noticed so many people using AI for work. Not just “pull this info” but in excel, PowerPoint, etc. It’s really been the last month or so. Previously, you’d see Outlook or Chrome on one screen and Excel or PPT on the right. But now, it’s AI on one and whatever you’re working on on the other.
I’m in an allocator / FoF role. I think I’ve been made obsolete—at least they need FAR fewer of us analysts / associates to do the work. My principal did a whole analysis this morning on a portfolio without asking me anything… and I’m the only analyst!
At least it’s very good at checking work. Catches so many things, correct FAR more often than not.
It’s probably only a matter of time before it’s as reliable as a calculator.
Are you all noticing this too? What’s next? Time to roll up the sleeves and learn operations or something niche?
The shift you're observing aligns with broader trends discussed in top WSO threads. AI is indeed reshaping the landscape for analysts and associates (An/Aso), particularly in roles that involve repetitive or process-driven tasks. Here's what you need to know:
AI's Impact on Analyst/Associate Roles:
AI as a Work Enhancer:
Future-Proofing Your Career:
What’s Next?
In short, while obsolescence is a concern, those who adapt and position themselves as value creators will find opportunities even in this rapidly changing environment.
Sources: Work at top AM -- AI will virtually kill of entry-level roles in AM over the next 5yrs, Work at top AM -- AI will virtually kill of entry-level roles in AM over the next 5yrs
I’m afraid yes. Claude Opus outperforms my Associate all day every day. I’d rather have $1,000 worth of Claude tokens every month than an Associate
The problem is the talent ladder as you can’t learn the job well by using Claude. So not only is Claude better / on par, the Associates are getting worse. I don’t need a human Claude interface either
Genuine question - why would then IB/PE hire analysts or associates at all? I’m out of the industry now so don’t have the latest scoop, but from my colleagues they say it is good for first cut but then it requires a lot of tweaking to get to client/IC level (which AN/ASO does the work)
For a last quality check. I except the work product to be bulletproof of mistakes and errors and hallucinations, it's not for me to go cell by cell or cross-check inputs with the sources it references to, so Claude might do 98% of the work mistake free, but it's up for the analyst/associate to catch the 2% and correct it. That's the last value add you have.
Ratione labore odit dolor quia. Sed quae illo voluptas. Perferendis illum impedit nihil reprehenderit magni. Et id enim vel omnis fugit laboriosam temporibus saepe.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...