I'm currently at a buyside shop (bank) focused on broadly syndicated loans and looking to make a move to either a bigger shop with more career upside (a scalable CLO platform) or a more opportunistic credit platform (MM/BDC, junior debt, stressed/distressed) .
I have had reasonable success getting interviews and varying success moving through the process (finals rounds/offers or dinged in the 1st round) with no real correlation to the type of strategy of the fund.
Some firms are happy with my base knowledge and willing to train up, whereas other shops have dinged me after the first round due to lack of i.) credit agreement negotiation; ii.) direct management exposure at the middle market level; or iii.) apparently less detailed modelling/diligence experience.
I was wondering if anyone with direct experience could comment on the differences in experience and skillset. I like to think the shop I am at right now has a pretty robust diligence and modelling process (base case / downside cases / recovery analysis / company valuations, etc) but it obviously doesnt fit the bill for some shops.
Also, any thoughts on filling that skillgap?
Thank you
Disclaimer, I know I'm bumping a nearly two year old thread
Technoviking my friend will you PM me? (I don't have any PMs as I rarely comment on this site)
Curious to hear where you're at now and your experiences with interviews
I think credit agreement negotiation would be the #1 ding, however, I am curious as to the types of loans you are buying? If they are investment grade, its likely that they would rather see leveraged loans/2nd Lien/mezzanine investments, as you are digging deeper/modeling is more robust and you are truly rolling up your sleeves.
leveraged loans, mostly TLBs but when you arent an anchor ticket or a big name CLO the reality is you're not negotiating /pushing back on terms. you either give feedback or you move onto the next opportunity.
Still transferable experience in my mind. You are seeing the exact same stuff as the people originating the transactions, but with an in depth investing viewpoint as opposed to trying to win every deal.
I don't really agree with that.
I'm at a midsized shop and we def push back/negotiate regularly. We dont write huge tickets but a lot of the time we are needed. This is dealing with the big guys as well (JPM, BARC, CS, BAML, GS, MS).
That being said, the process goes from Credit Analyst highlighting things they dont like in the doc-> credit committe-> PM-> Head of trading
Don't know of shops where Jr analysts are negotiating with the street. seems weird to get dinged for that, but maybe I just have a dif setup
Inventore optio voluptate ut suscipit nemo dolorem. Velit veritatis quia voluptas magnam neque omnis quia. Et inventore qui consequatur dolorem voluptatem. Dolorem possimus dolorum sed sequi sunt ipsam. Officiis eaque ut voluptatum laboriosam. Voluptates ut ea consequatur corporis error corrupti sunt architecto.
Atque qui enim quia officiis vel omnis. Quae labore dolore est culpa cupiditate. Dolorum iste aliquam quo porro voluptatem est at.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...