Goldman Yearly Feedback Meddling
TLDR: VP on my team tampered with my yearly feedback to lower scores that other people gave me. I’m wondering if I should escalate this.
At GS we have yearly feedback reviews where you choose several people who you worked with throughout the year, and they give you anonymous positive and constructive feedback, scoring you from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest/best).
I got mostly 5s and a couple of 4s, with three pages of positive feedback and only one page of constructive feedback.
My manager, with whom I have a very good relationship, confidentially told me that her manager forced her to lower my overall scores and make the feedback sound less positive and more neutral, otherwise I’d be expecting a promotion. This meant removing areas where I got high positive scores and adding made-up categories on which I have to improve (eg operating efficiency was removed from my strengths and added to the areas of improvement section). For another category, I got all 5s and two 4s but somehow the final score was 3 out of 5.
I don’t think meddling with feedback because the VP needs an excuse to not promote me is the point of the yearly feedback reviews. These should be used to learn where you need to improve.
I’m now thinking of escalating this to MDs or HR (HCM), but at the same time my manager told me about this confidentially, so I don’t want to put her in trouble. Moreover, I’ll be leaving GS at the end of the year for a better job, so this feedback fudging doesn’t impact me at all, it just pisses me off.
What do people suggest?
This situation is undeniably frustrating and highlights a deeper issue with transparency and fairness in performance reviews. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s how you might approach this:
1. Assess the Impact
2. Weigh the Risks of Escalation
3. Consider Alternative Actions
4. Focus on Your Exit
5. Advocate for Change (If You Stay Silent)
Final Thought:
If you’re leaving soon and this doesn’t impact your career, escalating might not be worth the potential fallout. However, if you feel strongly about addressing the unethical behavior, anonymous reporting could be a middle ground that protects your manager while highlighting the issue. Ultimately, prioritize your future and mental well-being over a battle that may not yield significant change.
Sources: How to Respond to Question in Bonus Communication ("What's Your Reaction to That?"), Motivation After a Bad Review, Annual Review was bad how do I bounce back?
Don’t ruin the confidence your manager has in you and escalate things. I say this because you’re leaving - it won’t affect you at all but will likely have a negative impact on your manager. If I were you, I’d be super pissed but bite my tongue.
Happens often at GS. They’ll push the few negatives. Reviews don’t really mean anything. Really all dependent on your reputation and what gets heard by senior people
Nihil autem vel dolor voluptas natus molestiae iure qui. Asperiores in distinctio voluptas temporibus porro. Incidunt quasi voluptas tempore molestiae perferendis. Deleniti quo nisi reprehenderit minima aut veritatis praesentium. Ut mollitia blanditiis est eum aut officiis quibusdam. Enim facere aperiam soluta vel nesciunt sed.
Ut sed quia error fuga sequi incidunt ea. Adipisci sed pariatur ratione quis qui voluptatem velit. Sint nostrum molestiae officia quia velit cum.
Hic hic ut quasi aut et. Culpa quod explicabo modi. Non rerum iste id. Veniam autem qui voluptatem odit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...