When you're shorting a stock or an asset, you're essentially selling something you borrowed in the market with the hopes of being able to buy it back at a lower price and the differential is your profit.
If my understanding is correct, a short position is inherently riskier than a long position even without leverage. Because technically, the biggest loss an asset or stock can have is -100% but the potential upswing is theoretically "infinite" (think Crypto or Amazon or Berkshire Hathaway since IPO). So the lose-win possibility is -100% / Infinite.
If you do a short however, this possibility is inverted, your highest possible gain is 100% and biggest possible loss is "infinite".
If that is correct then this risk translates into Short ETFs as well but are only mitigated by diversification of short positions?
But from a theoretical standpoint, the win/loss odds are still flipped in a short ETF (100% max gain vs "infinite" max loss)?
How are the risks mitigated? I assume some ETFs would also make use of options and derivatives in addition to actual short positions.
Cheers!
Molestiae dolores non aliquam quia qui asperiores aut. Dolor aut magni distinctio eaque qui quia. Aut voluptas veniam officiis voluptatibus veniam esse. Sequi atque eveniet et fugiat accusamus quasi architecto.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...