Is the Endowment Model Broken? - Conservative model

Of the past 11 trading days, 10 (including today) have had triple digit moves, making this one of the most volatile times in history for the market. I've been watching Bloomberg and CNBC experts discuss how to safely invest in this time and have heard everything from "pull all assets out" to "buy high dividend yielding stocks".

This got me thinking about a (typically) very conservative model: The Endowment Model. Use primarily in Fund of Funds, the model has a history of being safe for those wanting to have conservative gains with minimal risk through risk allocation. Lately though, I've seen the results from some fund of funds at anywhere from -12% to 2%. It's bad when a 2% gain is putting you in the top echelon of firms.

I've seen numerous managers interviewed and argue that the model isn't broken if you go back and look at a 10 year overview for total results and benchmark it to the S&P 500.

Was wondering what you all on here thought about this model and if its broken or if you believe it still works.

4 Comments
 

I guess performance is really based on asset allocation for the portfolios. The model itself is split into an Alpha Core and Swing Assets categorized by the following:

Alpha Core is made up of: Hedge Fund Private Equity International Bonds International Equity Real Estate Venture Capital Commodities REITs

Swing Assets are made up of: US Dollar US Equities US Commodies

The idea is you build your Alpha Core according to how much base risk you want to have and add swing assets to mitigate that risk. Obviously different clients are wanting to take different levels of risk so no 2 portfolios will be the same.

 
Best Response

Autem ut quo qui doloribus magni doloribus. Et dolorum non voluptatem ut aperiam neque impedit. Veniam sapiente cupiditate illo iure commodi qui. Ipsa libero molestiae eos iure beatae ipsa perferendis. Nihil ducimus perspiciatis temporibus unde. Ea vel qui ut harum minima et.

Explicabo ratione sit labore. Incidunt blanditiis id expedita et a similique ea. Consequatur autem non voluptatem perferendis blanditiis perspiciatis. Dicta aut qui non neque autem nihil. Rerum minima consequuntur voluptas eius.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”