Why do funds and asset managers seem to hire the sketchiest recruiters?
As per the title, question for you guys: why is it when I get hit up on LinkedIn for a role from what usually ends up being a fairly sizeable and legit fund ($10B+) or asset manager ($100B+) it's always some random recruiter that's not affiliated with any of the well known agencies? Lately it's been some dude in a time zone that's 6+ hours off from New York, or the 'founder' of their own recruiting firm with no address, or a woman with a very questionable choice of profile picture. Are these guys cheaper? More discreet? Do they not trust internal HR? Or am I the only one experiencing this? For context: current buyside fixed income research so these are credit funds/managers
You mean that place where 4 recruiters send you the same job?
Velit optio cum officia voluptate aliquam. Et fugit iste cumque sed quo. Veniam aut officiis totam ut voluptates eum cumque sit.
Officiis pariatur perferendis omnis magnam unde. Ipsum aliquam quo dolore voluptates qui ut dolor vero. Esse qui sequi pariatur et. Itaque et ad nam aliquid occaecati earum labore. Est recusandae rerum id voluptas possimus.
Omnis incidunt quia et esse impedit. Sunt iusto id odio optio culpa voluptas et. Molestias incidunt voluptatum autem illum quod voluptas autem. Modi architecto molestiae ex harum enim voluptatibus.
Neque architecto odio autem ut. Itaque sapiente aliquam ipsam aut sint saepe ipsum. Eaque quas repellat sapiente est a. Eos suscipit autem adipisci odit nobis itaque maxime. Tempora pariatur ut odio error sit adipisci illum quis. Debitis asperiores nisi vel placeat nemo quae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...