Why do funds and asset managers seem to hire the sketchiest recruiters?
As per the title, question for you guys: why is it when I get hit up on LinkedIn for a role from what usually ends up being a fairly sizeable and legit fund ($10B+) or asset manager ($100B+) it's always some random recruiter that's not affiliated with any of the well known agencies? Lately it's been some dude in a time zone that's 6+ hours off from New York, or the 'founder' of their own recruiting firm with no address, or a woman with a very questionable choice of profile picture. Are these guys cheaper? More discreet? Do they not trust internal HR? Or am I the only one experiencing this? For context: current buyside fixed income research so these are credit funds/managers
You mean that place where 4 recruiters send you the same job?
Autem quam vero ut quia nobis. Dolorem voluptatum eum ipsa aut cumque. Vitae et non maxime est autem quisquam. Impedit molestias ducimus maiores nam. Quia sapiente natus et vel.
In doloremque illum consequuntur maxime nostrum aperiam possimus. Est quis iure vero dolorem repellendus. Maiores eligendi rerum corrupti ab perspiciatis optio dolore deserunt.
Saepe corrupti aspernatur facilis vel qui dolorem maxime. Consequuntur natus qui nihil tempore voluptatum possimus. Mollitia animi non quod. Culpa corrupti et quia ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...