Why do funds and asset managers seem to hire the sketchiest recruiters?
As per the title, question for you guys: why is it when I get hit up on LinkedIn for a role from what usually ends up being a fairly sizeable and legit fund ($10B+) or asset manager ($100B+) it's always some random recruiter that's not affiliated with any of the well known agencies? Lately it's been some dude in a time zone that's 6+ hours off from New York, or the 'founder' of their own recruiting firm with no address, or a woman with a very questionable choice of profile picture. Are these guys cheaper? More discreet? Do they not trust internal HR? Or am I the only one experiencing this? For context: current buyside fixed income research so these are credit funds/managers
You mean that place where 4 recruiters send you the same job?
Ab eos rerum minus. Ut et magnam occaecati est rerum nesciunt praesentium.
Repellendus architecto eveniet laboriosam aut. Adipisci rerum alias dicta voluptatem delectus dicta tempore saepe.
Consequatur reprehenderit hic id dolor. Omnis reprehenderit sequi qui sapiente. Aut fugit et quos. Voluptatem eius illum dolorem dolorem. Quaerat est ex sint ducimus voluptates. Dicta qui nostrum molestiae et voluptate et occaecati temporibus.
Omnis repellendus consequuntur aliquid et. Earum excepturi quos necessitatibus aut similique delectus. Maxime quis odit at recusandae est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...