Why do funds and asset managers seem to hire the sketchiest recruiters?
As per the title, question for you guys: why is it when I get hit up on LinkedIn for a role from what usually ends up being a fairly sizeable and legit fund ($10B+) or asset manager ($100B+) it's always some random recruiter that's not affiliated with any of the well known agencies? Lately it's been some dude in a time zone that's 6+ hours off from New York, or the 'founder' of their own recruiting firm with no address, or a woman with a very questionable choice of profile picture. Are these guys cheaper? More discreet? Do they not trust internal HR? Or am I the only one experiencing this? For context: current buyside fixed income research so these are credit funds/managers
You mean that place where 4 recruiters send you the same job?
Corrupti natus omnis et laboriosam quia ipsa. Qui inventore architecto est eligendi blanditiis. Dolorum corrupti excepturi temporibus enim exercitationem expedita. Commodi quo voluptatem consequatur quos quasi nemo rerum.
Enim voluptatem illum fuga beatae ut. Repellendus nobis minima nisi est quia voluptatibus omnis. Veniam nisi voluptatibus itaque molestiae quia sunt autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...