alvarez & marsal restructuring or corporate performance improvement?

i’ve received first round interviews for both restructuring in atlanta and corporate performance improvement in chicago. i got a call from a recruiter asking which one i want to continue the process with. does anyone have any insight on the pros/cons of either group? which one should i choose if i want to maximize my chances of getting an offer?

11 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some insights on Alvarez & Marsal's Restructuring and Corporate Performance Improvement (CPI) groups:

Restructuring (Atlanta)

Pros: - Reputation: The restructuring business at A&M is top-notch with a reputation for great work. - Compensation: While base pay might be below average, bonuses can be significant. - Experience: You'll develop expertise in areas like 13-week cash flow models, business plans, and bankruptcy filings/prep. - Exit Opportunities: Natural exits include higher-ranking corporate finance roles, private equity, distressed situation hedge funds, and other specialized consulting groups. - Work Variety: Involves debtor-side engagements, working with treasury groups, building business plans, and assisting through the diligence process for potential investors/lenders.

Cons: - Hours: Long hours and travel are expected. - Workload: The work can be intense, especially if the project heads towards bankruptcy (BK).

Corporate Performance Improvement (CPI) (Chicago)

Pros: - Entrepreneurial Environment: The firm is entrepreneurial, rewarding hard work and high performance. - Skill Development: Opportunity to work on a variety of projects that can enhance your business acumen and operational skills. - Exposure: Potential to work across different business areas and industries, providing a broad skill set.

Cons: - Compensation: Specific details on CPI compensation are not provided, but it may be similar to restructuring in terms of base pay and bonuses. - Travel: Similar to restructuring, travel might be required depending on the project.

Decision Factors

  • Interest in Work: If you are more interested in financial restructuring, bankruptcy, and distressed assets, the restructuring group might be a better fit.
  • Location Preference: Consider whether you prefer to be based in Atlanta or Chicago.
  • Career Goals: Think about your long-term career goals and which group aligns better with them. Restructuring might offer more direct paths to roles in finance and private equity, while CPI could provide broader business and operational experience.

Recommendation

If your primary goal is to maximize your chances of getting an offer, consider the following: - Interest and Fit: Choose the group that aligns more with your interests and where you feel you can excel. - Preparation: Prepare thoroughly for the interview process of the chosen group, focusing on the specific skills and knowledge areas relevant to that group.

Good luck with your decision and interviews!

Sources: Alvarez and Marsal -- Restructuring and Turnaround Consulting, Alvarez & Marsal Restructuring, Received offers from all three MBB firms and don't know what to do, Restructuring prospects, why you should not consider restructuring, Restructuring prospects, why you should not consider restructuring

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Wait they already wrapped up SA apps for A&M? I thought SA was yet to open, and FT recruiting would start August/ September

 

Voluptatum nulla autem hic illum magnam. Distinctio repudiandae saepe est deleniti dolore voluptas molestias. Ullam voluptatem aut sint inventore.

Repudiandae non omnis in nemo quae pariatur. Hic illo et eum facilis. Rerum distinctio debitis quisquam labore nihil dolor ut. Quia quis illum et tempora. Debitis incidunt libero voluptatum quasi repellendus. Officia et veniam totam ea.

Officiis officia molestias perspiciatis eum. Odio ipsam libero magni recusandae doloribus aliquid. Repellendus optio dolorem beatae harum.

Nisi maxime ad adipisci animi neque. Distinctio et ea excepturi distinctio non rerum. Molestias iure consequatur fuga sapiente. Et quo dolorem beatae voluptates placeat deleniti dignissimos. Sunt minima in officia qui ex quo inventore. Eaque sed repudiandae quos iusto pariatur suscipit mollitia corporis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Consulting

  • Boston Consulting Group 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 98.9%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Consulting

  • Cornerstone Research 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group 98.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.9%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.5%
  • Boston Consulting Group 98.9%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $361
  • Principal (30) $294
  • Director/MD (58) $274
  • Vice President (53) $247
  • Engagement Manager (113) $232
  • Manager (170) $173
  • 2nd Year Associate (185) $142
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (116) $135
  • Senior Consultant (355) $132
  • Consultant (642) $122
  • 1st Year Associate (577) $121
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (164) $121
  • NA (16) $114
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (391) $104
  • Associate Consultant (176) $101
  • 1st Year Analyst (1164) $90
  • Intern/Summer Associate (208) $83
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (633) $68
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”