Bain vs McKinsey?
Was fortunate enough to land both Bain and McKinsey offers this time around at the same office, and would love to get people's opinion on which would be a better option. About me: Interested in exiting into tech/media/entertainment, would prefer not to travel too much (not a deal breaker, it's a part of the job), a relatively anxious person. Thank you in advance!
Quick 2 cents is that it sounds like for personal preferences Bain would be better but for objective results McK would be better:
More research to be done but that’s what I’m seeing. Go hunt down past threads on this, there’s a bunch
McKinsey is the bigger name and will open marginally more doors overall. Your exposure to different types of projects will also be a bit more at McKinsey.
But for your personal preferences (mine were similar), I'd really consider Bain over McKinsey. Bain is known for having the least travel out of the MBBs (but not completely zero travel so you'd still get some cool travel opportunites, just won't be relentless exhausting travel).
Bain's culture is known to be more focused on development and wellbeing of their consultants than McKinsey. Whilst Bain have a longer and slower progression path, it's often seen as less stressful than McKinsey's where BAs come in and own a workstream within a few months. Like the other commenter said, McKinsey is more swim or sink.
Salary wise the differences will likely be marginal especially in the early few years of your career. Overall you can't go wrong with either option tbh, great position to be in!
Echo what the posters above said, sounds like Bain is more aligned with your personality and goals.
Just to expand a bit on the McKinsey exits vs. Bain, yes McK is a bigger brand than Bain, but for the majority of roles that are looking to hire, MBB is grouped together and you're not going to be at a disadvantage because you were at Bain vs. McK. If you can't get a role, it's not because you were at Bain instead of McK.
That being said, there are places where there is a difference that comes down to industry coverage of the firms. For example, Bain does way less government and pharma work vs. McK. Consequently, McK is stronger in both of those than Bain, and given their brand and scale there, it will be better for those exits. But in other industries where both play in like TMT (in fact, if you are interested in TMT and your offer is at Bain SF it's a no brainer), the difference in brand is marginal and your offer will be determined by other factors than which letter in MBB you are from.
at bain, had a friend choose bain over mckinsey for the sole reason of too much travel. assuming yk about local staffing. at mck it's about 80/90% travel, at bain its 50/50%. Bain strongly respects travel boundries as well.
From what I hear Mck hours are longer but a by a bit (9-8 at bain versus 8-9 at mck) but that does add up over time.
as for tech, bain (especially bain SF) generally does slightly better, but it's minimal in difference. we have openAI and palantir partnerships, so a lot of really sexy work happening rn + in the pipeline. media/entertainment prob depends on office, if you're nyc/atl/west coast there will be far more at bain than mck, any other office mck prob takes the cake. your bain office is moderately important in the types of cases you'll have. but also there are no random ass regional offices (like mck and bcg, so no NJ office, no miami office, no des moines office, no philly office, etc.) -- only t1/t2 major cities, so there's almost always a good mix of cases. People always give the houston example (a lot of O&G) but houston staffs with texas/southern, and texas has every industry imaginable.
once again, the obv choice here is mckinsey from a brand name perspective, but your exits will probably be the exact same no matter where you go. at the end of the day they work with a lot of the same clients and you're smart enough to get into both. never got a mck offer so I'll never be in your shoes, but I think knowing what i know now, i would choose bain. obv I'm biased btw, so take my advice with a grain of salt.
.
I think its harder to say that any mck office is "better" since they're staffed so wide, although yes networking will be easier. With Bain, imo there's more of an office ranking - bain SF is arguably the best MBB office purely because of the local model where they can "hog" all the sexy tech cases. Mck miami will have a pretty similar experience to mck nyc because the case availability is pretty similar. Like I said earlier, bain doesn't have offices in t3 or below cities and they cover such wide areas, so there's no office with a particularly "bad" case pool, but there are offices where it's much easier to specialize and find depth in fields.
That's why I think for the sake of OP, Bain office matters a lot that whatever the Mck office is.
Doesn't office theoretically not matter (/matter much less) at McKinsey? I have alumni connections who have told me they've never worked a study in the same region as their home office.
.
Staffing differs wildly between Bain & McKinsey.
At Bain, you have centralized staffing where there is a staffer assigned to your cohort (ACs, Cs, etc.) who is in charge of putting you onto cases. They do take your opinion into account a little bit, but the process is mainly autonomous and dependent on business need. You will only be staffed with people at your office, but you will most likely work with a wide range of people in the office. If you are in the PE group, you will most likely switch teams every month (a diligence is ~3-4 weeks). For more generalist, corporate strategy cases, you will be staffed to the same time over the duration of the case (~6 weeks up to 1 year). You don't have much of a choice of who you work with and it's often luck of the draw.
At McKinsey, staffing is fully autonomous. Yes they have a "staffer," but they have very little decision sway over the cases you end up on. Getting staffed is dependent on you networking with partners / engagement managers, which has positives and downsides. While you can focus on the types of projects / company groups you're most interested in, you could also just end up unstaffed long-term if you don't network enough. (I've still had long stretches of unstaffed time at Bain as well). However, the biggest positive is that if you like the team you're working with / the partner on the case / industry sector & practice, you could just stay working with the same people over your whole McKinsey experience. I know people who've worked with the same 2 dozen people over the past few years they were at McKinsey. You're able to form much deeper professional relationships this way I believe because you are able to work with the same people consistently over time. It is important for you to take initiative, but McKinsey allows it so if you find people who will vouch for and believe in you, you could just continue working with them. That is unfortunately not possible at Bain and staffing has become more haphazard and random in recent years. Even as a Bain person, I prefer McKinsey's model because you have more power to influence your staffing and I cannot understate how important it is to work with the same people for long period of time (e.g., at least 2 months).
Other than that, I wouldn't read too much into the differences in cultures between firms. Bain's office culture is pretty much dead and McKinsey never really had much of a culture to begin with, so they're on equal footing. Only Bain office that has some semblance of culture is Boston, but Chi / NY / SF / LA have all gone downhill. You will probably have the same experience at both firms in terms of connecting with your business analyst / associate consultant class. Also, McKinsey has wayyy more money for social events than Bain does, so McKinsey probably will have more class social events for bonding and whatnot. Bain is lowkey pretty broke in terms of their social funds - quite sad actually.
Can you talk a little bit about office culture being dead outside of Boston? A close friend of mine recently interned in one of the offices you mentioned as having "gone downhill," but he raved about how friendly and close-knit the culture there is when we spoke.
I can't say too much without doxxing myself, but I would take what your friend tells you with a grain of salt. MBB firms do their best to hide interns from negative aspects of the firm and they're honestly somewhat babied. Interns on my teams always logged off at 5pm, there were intern after-work events every other week (e.g., baseball game, happy hour), people are generally kinder to you as well. At my firm, an intern could email the head of the office for a coffee chat and they are 100% going to respond, but not likely to happen if you are full time.
They make these internship programs super appealing to draw people into the MBB experience. I think anyone at any MBB firm will tell you that their internship experience was far far better than their experience once joining full time.
It's good your friend enjoyed their summer, but tell them to take off the rose-tinted glasses before they start - or they are in for a rude awakening.
2 of my best friends are at McKinsey and Bain. McKinsey culture feels a lot like my BB investment bank, Bain makes me jealous. Collegiate, flexible, company looks out for you. It's a good place to be.
I worked at Bain and trust me, the culture is a facade. They are just as ruthless as McKinsey and like any business, care more about their bottom line than employees. Bain still pushes people out, like McKinsey & BCG - no differences there
@Everyone - Thank you all for your insights!! McKinsey has offered to transfer my start to the NYC office, while Bain has been slower to do so. Since McK's deadline is earlier, should I just sign the NYC offer, or should I continue to wait Bain out?
I would just do McKinsey. I worked in Bain NYC and absolutely hated it - worst culture out of all Bain offices
I am so sorry that you had a poor experience ☹️ signed my McK offer today knowing that consulting will be brutal to me no matter what, especially if I want to move to such a high-performing city, and that differences between culture will probably be marginal
Why did you hate the NYC office?
coming from banking, whats "bad" / "tough" consulting cultures like? some examples would be helpful lol
I'm an An3 now who did MBB. IB is way worse. MBB until engagement manager level you don't work weekends (at least at my MBB/office - with no travel (lucky here again based on my office)). IB weekends are totally expected, vacations aren't respected, etc. MBB not like this, you can leave your laptop at home when you take a week or two off with no issues, take a month off a year, etc.
Depends entirely on how you think about culture/ what you value. Yes consultants generally work less but that mostly comes down to Fridays/ weekends no work. It’s heavily looked down upon if an analyst works the weekend and generally will piss off managers (since the partners then think that the manager ain’t task managing effectively), and ppl can actually get fired for working too much lol.
The culture though can be bad in the sense that some people are really abrasive / hard to work with (will get very angry for page turns etc).
McKinsey brand is superior for almost all exits, excluding PE. McKinsey is also the "household-brand" and generally a stamp-of-approval that you will be able to get at few other places in the white collar world. Bain does not have that to that extent.
That being said, I think McK is really a place that caters top performers. The staffing system is like a "marketplace" where you get requests from teams but don't really have to accept them. There are no formal staffers as in a sense of "Hey Jim, next Monday you will be staffed on this industrial company in the middle of nowhere".
If you are a "rockstar" (I hate that awful word but it fosters common understanding) you will have a good time. People will want to staff you all the time and cater around you to make things work for you (i.e., let you travel differently, give you preferred workstreams, etc.). Your PDs (so to say official development managers, not so much influence factors) will also flatter you/like you. Their performance is evaluated on the utilization of the consultants in their pool so if you are a top-performer they will like you and be nice to you. Also they don't have any hassle with you as you always confirm staffing yourself.
This leads to some sort of "winner takes it all" cycle in which good people -> viewed favourably -> get staffed on sexy/cool stuff (or can pick the work they want to) -> get staffed on more high profile/interesting stuff as they have experience in doing high profile/interesting stuff.
Now the problem is if you don't hit your stride (doesn't necessarily mean you have low ability, also a lot of random factors involved in the beginning and differences in persoanlities) you will observe the firm in a completely different light.
Little opportunities open up and the downside of a market system will show through. Like in any markt, you will be left with the "assets" (i.e., studies/projects) that nobody really wants to do (this is exaggerated of course but on average true). Meaning, you will get smacked with the long/boring transformation/PMO projects which on top can be even filled with toxic leadership and long hours (hence them not finding people; boring projects don't have to be bad if you have great lifestyle).
And as the Chad/top-performer is propelled by his positive feedback-loop, you will observe the negative/downward spiral loop. Long/bad projects -> limited exposure to interesting/sexy stuff -> interesting sexy/stuff wants to staff the well-liked Chads who have done sort of staff before -> you will be stuck with your work and often have limited sponsors/supporters -> you are also not PDs darling as is Chad hence they also won't like you -> bad reviews -> constant pressure / anxiety -> crash out.
Again take it with a grain of salt but I try to illustrate you a bit how McKinsey works from the inside. And I want to emphasize again that this does not only come down to ability. In general I observed that the "true" top performers eventually turned out fine (even if randomness of staffing could have dragged them down at the beginning). However, there are for sure several cases of "false negatives" (i.e., top performers that are perceived as bad sjust because they got smacked in the beginning and went down a negative feedback loop).
Hope this adds some color here.
Can expand to many more angles as I know the MBB space quiet well. Please excuse my style and non-sharp writing. European non-native and just typing out my thoughts while in commute.
Thank you for your insight! This was something I was always worried about, but signed my McK offer today. Do you have any advice on how to start out with your best foot forward when it comes to environments like this? How can I best prep myself for this worst case scenario?
Double clicking on a comment mentioned in passing here — how well you do at MBB and if you’re a “Chad” doesn’t come down entirely to your abilities and intelligence. I know dudes who were rockstars at McKinsey who were laughed at in industry for being kind of incompetent. A big part of this comes down to your confidence, market conditions when you start etc.
Just mentioning since you’re in for a bit of a rough time at McKinsey. It’s a wonderful developmental experience but don’t let work become your identity.there are going to be rough spots, don’t let that damage your soul too much
Autem provident facere non ratione ex rerum non. Ea quis culpa iusto omnis quo. Amet quis molestiae id dolores nulla veritatis.
Et ut ipsum dolorum rerum et consequuntur. Illum sequi molestias et quaerat saepe aliquid. Architecto consequatur ullam dolor ut officiis placeat officia laborum. Cumque iusto dolore ut molestiae reiciendis est voluptas aliquid. Qui quo vitae eos quaerat dolor accusantium sapiente.
Voluptatem reprehenderit dolores quasi est est fuga rerum occaecati. Nam et quidem enim tempore voluptatem accusantium et odit. Voluptatem quidem earum quaerat nulla dolorem id. Impedit error et quia blanditiis dolores ullam.
Commodi in quidem dolore magni exercitationem accusamus quaerat. Ipsum vel et laboriosam reiciendis et cupiditate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Dolores aut dolores consequatur sed quas. Facilis eaque commodi adipisci qui. Exercitationem laudantium eos et molestiae tempora non et. Laboriosam molestias reprehenderit necessitatibus occaecati.
Consequuntur laudantium atque eum. Sint voluptatem est totam suscipit. Nesciunt quia dolores placeat est recusandae officiis. Eos enim reprehenderit qui ut. Sit consequuntur culpa maiores illo quis eaque itaque.