Business idea - viable or stupid?

A former colleague and I were discussing whether a transaction-focused M&A service business would be viable.  I realize in a sense it would be in competition with large full-service m&a firms, so I’ve been pondering if there is a legitimate market for transaction services without the equity sourcing part of the equation. In other words, we’re wanting to offer deal closing services, everything post contract, for a fee.  We both have triple digit number of deals closed totaling in the billions from a middle office/finance ops perspective in both private equity and real estate. My questions are do y’all think this service is desirable, and what sort of fees do you think dealmakers would be happy to pay for signed contract to closing services. Thanks for your consideration.

2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some insights regarding your business idea:

Viability of a Transaction-Focused M&A Service Business

  1. Market Demand:

    • There is a potential market for specialized transaction services, especially for firms that may not have the in-house expertise or resources to handle the complexities of deal closing.
    • Smaller GPs and firms might find value in outsourcing these services to ensure smooth and efficient deal closures.
  2. Competition:

    • While you would be competing with large full-service M&A firms, your niche focus on post-contract deal closing could differentiate your services.
    • Emphasizing your extensive experience in closing deals in both private equity and real estate could be a strong selling point.
  3. Service Desirability:

    • Many firms might appreciate the ability to outsource the intricate and time-consuming aspects of deal closing, allowing them to focus on other strategic activities.
    • Your service could be particularly attractive to firms looking to streamline their operations and reduce the risk of deal failures.

Fee Structure

  1. Fee Expectations:

    • Fees in the M&A space can vary widely based on the complexity and size of the deal. For example, in real estate finance, fees can range from 0.5% to 2% of the transaction value, depending on the services provided and the market conditions.
    • For high-value deals (e.g., $100MM+), fees might be around 0.70-0.75 bps, especially for complex transactions involving multiple layers of financing.
  2. Potential Fee Models:

    • Flat Fee: Charging a fixed fee for your services could provide clarity and predictability for your clients.
    • Percentage-Based Fee: Charging a percentage of the transaction value might align your incentives with the success of the deal.
    • Hybrid Model: Combining a base fee with a success fee could balance your need for compensation with the client's desire for performance-based pricing.

Conclusion

Your business idea of offering transaction-focused M&A services appears viable, especially if you can clearly articulate the value and efficiency you bring to the deal closing process. The key will be to differentiate your services from those of full-service M&A firms and to establish a fee structure that reflects the value you provide while being acceptable to your target market.

If you need more detailed insights or examples, exploring specific threads on Wall Street Oasis related to M&A fees and deal closing processes could provide additional valuable information.

Sources: Origination Fees on +$100MM Loans, What's happening during live deals?, Debt Placement Fees, Case Interview - How to get a sense of a potential revenue of a new business service?, How various professionals see the world

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Dolores delectus veritatis distinctio quis voluptates. Delectus vitae repellat enim sit architecto ea. Et sint consequatur quia qui dignissimos ratione ratione quod. Nihil voluptatem molestias soluta harum.

At dignissimos non magnam quis. Sed natus culpa ut culpa reiciendis voluptates. Est sit similique vitae quis fuga.

Repellendus odio repellat et eveniet dolorum dolores consequatur odit. Perferendis ut dignissimos est porro molestias.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Consulting

  • Boston Consulting Group 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Consulting

  • Cornerstone Research 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • Boston Consulting Group 98.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.9%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.5%
  • Boston Consulting Group 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $361
  • Principal (30) $294
  • Director/MD (58) $274
  • Vice President (54) $246
  • Engagement Manager (113) $232
  • Manager (170) $173
  • 2nd Year Associate (185) $142
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (116) $135
  • Senior Consultant (354) $132
  • Consultant (642) $122
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (164) $121
  • 1st Year Associate (576) $121
  • NA (16) $114
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (390) $104
  • Associate Consultant (176) $101
  • 1st Year Analyst (1163) $90
  • Intern/Summer Associate (208) $83
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (632) $68
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”