“I found my mentoring session with André very helpful, particularly because I came into it with very little understanding of commercial banking. My background is in life sciences and healthcare, and most of my career exploration so far has focused on consulting. Although I had become interested in commercial banking, I had not previously explored the area in any depth. I therefore needed a clear starting point and an honest conversation about what I should understand before deciding whether to pursue it.
André helped me establish that starting point. The session gave me a clearer way to think about commercial banking, how it differs from consulting, and what I still need to learn. Before the conversation, I was looking at opportunities and wondering whether I should begin applying alongside consulting applications. Afterwards, I understood that I needed to take a step back and make a more informed decision about whether the work genuinely interests me.
One of the most valuable aspects of the session was how it helped me recognise the gaps in my current understanding. I knew that I was new to banking, but I did not necessarily know which questions I needed to answer for myself. André’s guidance helped me think more clearly about where I am now, what I am missing, and what I should begin doing next. Having that direction was useful because it made the process feel more manageable. Rather than treating banking as a broad and unfamiliar industry, I now have a clearer starting point for learning about it.
A particularly helpful message was that I should first develop a better understanding of commercial banking and assess whether I actually like the work. I took away a sensible sequence: understand the area, decide whether it appeals to me, and then, if it does, commit to learning and preparing for applications. If I discover that the work does not suit my interests, I should be willing to recognise that and focus my efforts elsewhere. That advice sounds straightforward, but it was an important perspective for me at this stage.
The conversation made me realise that I should not rush into applying for commercial banking roles simply because I have found programmes that look interesting. Before the session, I was at risk of moving too quickly from curiosity to applications without having a strong enough understanding of the career itself. André helped me see the value of being more deliberate. I would rather make a considered application based on a genuine interest in the work than spend time applying to positions I cannot yet explain my motivation for pursuing.
Another important takeaway was recognising how substantial the differences between banking and consulting can be. Because consulting has been my main focus, it had become my reference point when thinking about other careers. The session helped me realise that I cannot assume banking will involve similar work, suit the same preferences, or require exactly the same preparation. I need to understand banking on its own terms rather than view it mainly as another option alongside consulting.
I also appreciated that the session was useful even though I did not finish it with a final career decision. At this exploratory stage, greater clarity about what I do not yet know is meaningful progress. I now feel better equipped to evaluate my interest, identify what I need to learn, and decide whether commercial banking deserves a more focused place in my career plans.
Overall, André was very helpful, and the session met an important need for me as someone starting with limited knowledge of the field. Its greatest value was giving me direction and encouraging a more thoughtful approach to my next steps. I left with a clearer understanding of my knowledge gaps, a more realistic perspective on the difference between banking and consulting, and a better sense of how to move forward before committing to applications.”
uhhhh as far as i know IBM CbD is decently well regarded and I wasn't aware Grant Thornton had expanded past accounting work into consulting tbh...
take that for what you may (its either my ignorance or theres a clear choice here- IBM)
IBM CbD from what I have seen is usually considered in high regard while you don't hear much about GT. I've met people in GT's practice and they usually recruit (PSU, Vandy level schools) and seemed nice. I think IBM CbD would edge prestige-wise.
I'd go with IBM. It gets a lot of shit on this site for being a technology consulting gig despite selling themselves on campus to students as a place to begin a strategy consulting career, but if youre alternative is tech consulting at a lesser known firm, this is prob a no brainer. IBM came in at #2 for IT Strategy and #2 for IT Operations Consulting by Vault this year (second only to Accenture in both cases), and is a top-notch place to work in tech consulting. Definitely the call over Grant Thornton which, while growing rapidly, does not have the same level of brand recognition and market dominance
Facilis nihil quibusdam iusto eius cumque. Necessitatibus amet dolores quod sed aut quae. Voluptas sunt vel quis magnam nam.
Nulla reprehenderit dolores quia quisquam quidem id et. Autem dignissimos vero quia culpa voluptatibus. Aperiam aspernatur illo praesentium modi soluta autem voluptatem. Eos nam accusamus quia.
Aut atque quod facilis accusantium delectus. Architecto quae quod dolor possimus sunt ut. Perferendis quo mollitia aut nihil repellendus odio. Incidunt deleniti ut excepturi dolorem sed ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...