“I found my mentoring session with André very helpful, particularly because I came into it with very little understanding of commercial banking. My background is in life sciences and healthcare, and most of my career exploration so far has focused on consulting. Although I had become interested in commercial banking, I had not previously explored the area in any depth. I therefore needed a clear starting point and an honest conversation about what I should understand before deciding whether to pursue it.
André helped me establish that starting point. The session gave me a clearer way to think about commercial banking, how it differs from consulting, and what I still need to learn. Before the conversation, I was looking at opportunities and wondering whether I should begin applying alongside consulting applications. Afterwards, I understood that I needed to take a step back and make a more informed decision about whether the work genuinely interests me.
One of the most valuable aspects of the session was how it helped me recognise the gaps in my current understanding. I knew that I was new to banking, but I did not necessarily know which questions I needed to answer for myself. André’s guidance helped me think more clearly about where I am now, what I am missing, and what I should begin doing next. Having that direction was useful because it made the process feel more manageable. Rather than treating banking as a broad and unfamiliar industry, I now have a clearer starting point for learning about it.
A particularly helpful message was that I should first develop a better understanding of commercial banking and assess whether I actually like the work. I took away a sensible sequence: understand the area, decide whether it appeals to me, and then, if it does, commit to learning and preparing for applications. If I discover that the work does not suit my interests, I should be willing to recognise that and focus my efforts elsewhere. That advice sounds straightforward, but it was an important perspective for me at this stage.
The conversation made me realise that I should not rush into applying for commercial banking roles simply because I have found programmes that look interesting. Before the session, I was at risk of moving too quickly from curiosity to applications without having a strong enough understanding of the career itself. André helped me see the value of being more deliberate. I would rather make a considered application based on a genuine interest in the work than spend time applying to positions I cannot yet explain my motivation for pursuing.
Another important takeaway was recognising how substantial the differences between banking and consulting can be. Because consulting has been my main focus, it had become my reference point when thinking about other careers. The session helped me realise that I cannot assume banking will involve similar work, suit the same preferences, or require exactly the same preparation. I need to understand banking on its own terms rather than view it mainly as another option alongside consulting.
I also appreciated that the session was useful even though I did not finish it with a final career decision. At this exploratory stage, greater clarity about what I do not yet know is meaningful progress. I now feel better equipped to evaluate my interest, identify what I need to learn, and decide whether commercial banking deserves a more focused place in my career plans.
Overall, André was very helpful, and the session met an important need for me as someone starting with limited knowledge of the field. Its greatest value was giving me direction and encouraging a more thoughtful approach to my next steps. I left with a clearer understanding of my knowledge gaps, a more realistic perspective on the difference between banking and consulting, and a better sense of how to move forward before committing to applications.”
I can only talk about your second thought, in regards to career, Implementation at McK is quite much like their expert track, so it won't be the same progression as a generalist. In relation to exit opps, I think you would have odds at M7, as 1) McKinsey in your resume period. 2) Business Schools know that even not being the McK partner track the recruitment process is still being pretty much the same, so you have the smarts.
In regards to exit opps in industry those are obviously not the same as that of generalist, think that you would be doing the same kind of work that B4 MC and Accenture, pure implementation/execution, so think internal positions in operations like performance analyst, process management/improvement and such.
Thanks for the response. I suspected as much. My ambition is to go the partner track. I suspect I will go to business school in order to "reset" myself and rejoin the firm as an associate after I get my MBA.
Really curious on the comp. package for a new implementation coach, however. Saw the glass door with only two data points... Does anyone have first hand knowledge?
Any update on this? I am also wondering about compensation.
Anyone?
I have to respectfully disagree with Holybanker that "Implementation at McK is quite much like their expert track, so it won't be the same progression as a generalist". All three are very different tracks but all of them can be partner electable. - Generalist track to Partner - Expert track to Expert Partner (same comp, same benefits, added content expertise vs. generalist Partner, only downside is exit opps will be restricted to the field of expertise) - Implementation is relatively new and may not have a well defined path yet, but it could very well evolve into a partner electable track. The specifics are different in US vs. India vs. Australia vs. South East Asia. This is a great discussion to have with your recruiter.
I can't comment on the comp, but I'd be surprised if it's less than a BA.
Don't discard this opportunity.
Good luck!
Quos ut asperiores consequuntur vero similique est impedit. Corporis non distinctio ipsa tempora rerum commodi. At at dolor quod porro ipsa molestias incidunt amet. Voluptas alias sed voluptatem consequatur praesentium qui et et. Aut voluptatem nobis aliquam. Et vero vitae omnis accusantium porro dolores rem. Consequatur ipsa similique ea odio excepturi illo velit necessitatibus.
Ut et eos culpa. Mollitia animi ullam excepturi sint saepe. Et voluptas quo accusantium ipsam ex et cum non.
Et est totam quia omnis aliquam hic sed. Nostrum harum ipsa vel veritatis blanditiis est culpa numquam. Omnis ea inventore itaque saepe sunt sit vel. Omnis temporibus ipsam qui cumque.
Nihil natus aut perspiciatis eum in voluptas. Perspiciatis ut aut consequatur accusamus ut aspernatur aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...