Hi everyone - long time lurker, first time poster. Wondering what you guys think about this situation. I know this forum is very prestige / brand / "tier" driven so I already know what many of you are going to say. What would you guys choose if you were faced with offers from the mentioned groups? This would be for an experienced, non-manager role.
I've done a lot of implementation / execution consulting and working for the same client for upwards of 12 months can get stale. I think the opportunity with S& might be better from a professional growth standpoint as strategy engagements are typically much shorter and you get exposure to more clients. Comp seems to be pretty comparable across both roles.
On a related note, are exit opportunities really going to be that different?
If you want to do strategy, take S&. If you want to do Implementation, take McK.
S&, shorter / more interesting projects will be advantageous in your early career if you're still figuring out what you're interested in
Isn't McKinsey implementation middle office? Whereas S& Is FO? Or am I incorrect?
No, implementation consulting is not BO
Yeah - from what I gathered, someone in MI can even get staffed on strategy projects from time to time.
.
Aut ad et animi rerum voluptate. Dicta iure veritatis sed beatae delectus beatae in. Quasi est sit ab ut repudiandae alias et. Temporibus et ut deleniti nostrum nam labore. Optio et consequatur beatae voluptas omnis. Quisquam occaecati qui provident est omnis est vel repellat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...