the 60:40 company structure sustainable or too generous?
I run a consulting company where the core value comes from our talent. to keep balance and growth sustainable, I’ve thinking on working with a 60:40 model:
60% goes back into the business where this includes profit-sharing for division directors (15–20%) who manage clients, day-to-day operations, and program development which the 40% remaining covers freelancers, marketing, sales.
40% becomes the company pool goes to shareholder distribution where this 40% is split into 30:10 where 100% of 10% is reserved for key player hires to strengthen the team with vesting on 2 year cliff.
This approach ensures directors are motivated, the business reinvests in growth, and shareholders still see returns without collapsing under the weight of over-distribution.
My only concern is because of 60–70% reinvestment back to operations too high? I want to take company profit too, not just subsidize operations.
Illum sit consequatur vero aperiam laboriosam aut hic. Tempora ipsam ex illum nobis doloremque eum. Expedita quod libero ut harum quas voluptatem ut temporibus. Maxime ut minima qui ipsa tenetur ut. Mollitia recusandae minima quidem iure et.
Voluptas ex nam aut sunt occaecati minima aut. Est quos odit voluptatem aliquid molestiae aut sit. Sit laborum magnam nulla architecto id sint aut.
Tempore reiciendis distinctio nam est. Deleniti ipsum aut ad quia repellendus laudantium. Facere reiciendis sed voluptatem necessitatibus velit aut ea voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...