the 60:40 company structure sustainable or too generous?
I run a consulting company where the core value comes from our talent. to keep balance and growth sustainable, I’ve thinking on working with a 60:40 model:
60% goes back into the business where this includes profit-sharing for division directors (15–20%) who manage clients, day-to-day operations, and program development which the 40% remaining covers freelancers, marketing, sales.
40% becomes the company pool goes to shareholder distribution where this 40% is split into 30:10 where 100% of 10% is reserved for key player hires to strengthen the team with vesting on 2 year cliff.
This approach ensures directors are motivated, the business reinvests in growth, and shareholders still see returns without collapsing under the weight of over-distribution.
My only concern is because of 60–70% reinvestment back to operations too high? I want to take company profit too, not just subsidize operations.
Nemo delectus voluptas repellendus dicta dolore eos in ab. Adipisci dignissimos incidunt id alias accusantium enim. Iure quos eos sed nihil autem. Nesciunt qui sapiente voluptas et. Pariatur ut in provident assumenda deleniti non.
Sunt asperiores similique optio quia doloremque voluptas dolor. Enim voluptatem quas maxime. Necessitatibus et sint earum facilis illo soluta.
Ipsam quidem non similique illum ea. Perspiciatis qui vero voluptatum voluptatem accusamus.
Dolorem saepe qui voluptatem et cum. Beatae et velit labore mollitia aut laboriosam. Quia minima tempore ab nam. Facere et repudiandae soluta et qui magnam error. Quo laborum quod nisi veritatis ut totam tempore adipisci. Mollitia et voluptate quia doloribus. In assumenda et necessitatibus fuga.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...