Compensation Structure at the mid-management level in Corporate Development / Strategy / Finance

Curious how comp structure looks in Corp Dev / Strat / Fin as you progress through the ranks. I know it can vary a lot by industry/company at the senior levels (VP, SVP, EVP), but I wonder if it is more or less the same at lower levels. Would be great to get some insight from more experienced folks here. My current understanding laid out below:

Analyst / Associate level: Salary + Bonus + RSUs, where bonus is based on firm and individual performance.
Manager / Sr. Manager level: I believe structure is similar to Analyst/Associate. This is purely based on interviewing candidates at this stage who are looking to join my team. Would love more experienced folks to chime in on this.
Director / Sr. Director level: I believe this is the level where the comp structure can start to look a bit different and can vary widely across industries / companies, but I don't have any empirical evidence (as I'm not there yet).

Any insight would be greatly appreciated, thanks!


Hey FWU, I'm the WSO Monkey any of these help:

  • How much travel is there in Venture Capital? they travel? I also have the same question for mid managers and GPs. to Tuesday, November 28, 2017- ... How much travel is there in VC at all levels? Say you have a typical associate role, how much do ...
  • Good recruiters in LA/OC area mid-management level. ... one that work primarily with finding positions in consulting / corporate development at the ... Does anyone know of any good recruiters/agencies in the southern California area? I am looking for ...
  • Corporate Strategy vs Corporate Development let's look at the career opportunities each presents and judge them accordingly. Corporate development ... Corporate development interviews, while they vary a ton by company in structure, are typically familiar to ... start off working in a tech company in their Corporate Strategy and Development
  • Corporate Finance Q&A with accountingbyday, BJM85, STorIB, and djfiii corporate development, will I have a better shot at the position coming from a SA position in IB Risk or ... people who come in from, say, MckBB or IB at the manager level? How are they getting the exposure to many ... Corporate Strategy and Corporate Development? BJM85: Corp
  • Management Consulting Salary & Compensation, Average Bonus in Consulting compensation at the partner level. Here's @petergibbons with some insight into the bonus structure for ... Here's @Veracity regarding MBB pay at the partner level. There is not a single partner in a developed ... make around 20% more than someone at the same
  • Some Observations from an MD in the industry, having started as an analyst at a BB M&A group, and principally worked in BB ... this. 6. Be amongst the best in your profession at something If you are an investment banker, know one ... internationally, jump at it. The world looks very different in Sao Paolo or Warsaw or Riyadh or Istanbul or ...
  • CS/JPM/BAML Fin Sponsors (FSG) at Associate/VP level mid-management buckets. Does it limit exit opps given PE route is tough and you have less exposure to corp ... There is plenty of information out there about FSG at the Analyst level and the buyside recruiting ... opportunities it creates (especially for groups that handle the modelling), but at the Associate/VP level at CS .
  • More suggestions...

No promises, but thought I'd mention a few relevant users that work in the industry: sfmarina ToonArmy Entchev

Fingers crossed that one of those helps you.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

I thought it might be helpful to bump this question from FWU.

There's a closer meaning to my user name. Try reading it quickly. Perhaps you will then understand ;P

No this actually was a bonus since it was not stated in my signed offer when I got promoted from intern to analyst. It happened during my end of the year review, 6 months into FT gig. They basically wanted me to commit to the company (the junior version of "golden handcuff"). But you are also right that it is now part of my comp, even though they can bump it for merit increase. I actually have no cash bonus in my comp, but the equity grant is supposed to be for senior managers and up.

PS: This is not tech by the way, it's in the wireless space infra/telecom. I do not work in NY or CAL but it's a very nice place. Medium COL area


Hey- I'm curious about your path and what kind of experience comprised those 6 years. Currently in my 3rd and final year of an FLDP and I'm hoping to hit manager by 5-8 YoE.. At this stage that seems impossible, but I know I'm influenced by the slow promo cycles in aerospace and defense. Looking to leave as soon as the FLDP is over.

Any insight is helpful- Thanks!


So i would say my path was atypical. I spent a little over three years in FP&A and then jumped to a tier 2 consulting role doing transaction-related work (think TAS/Merger Integration). Spent about two years there and decided it was great experience but wasn't for me and left for my current role.

Current firm is a good place to work with a lot of growth potential, so plan on sticking here for the forseeable future.

Most Helpful

As with so many things, the answer here is: it depends. Compensation within corporate structures varies a lot more widely than you might imagine. The exact same role at two similarly-sized companies in the same city might see markedly different comp packages. That's doubly true for corporate development.

While most companies will use some third-party service to sanity check their compensation levels, those salary surveys are pretty worthless in corporate development. The reason is simple: there are too many variables to make a ceteris paribus comparison. Even the title 'director' means different things at different companies. That's even more true for the 'manager' title. Some firms (especially high-growth tech companies) massively inflate the titles of their employees, so 'managers' in corporate development at a lot of pre-IPO firms may only have 2-3 years total experience.

A 'director' at any firm should be the equivalent of a principal at a PE fund. You need to be able to source, analyze and run your own deals from inception to close. That means you are a known entity within your sector. Bankers, consultants, lawyers, accountants, etc have worked with you several times before. You know what to pay them for their services for deals of various sizes. You know how to negotiate term sheets, SPAs, APAs, etc. You know what your investment committee is likely to accept, and you know how to convince your board of directors/C-suite that what you think is worth pursuing on the terms you (largely) negotiated.

In the United States, this should be a person with about 10-15 years of experience. The 'Sr. Director' title is bullshit. It's used in some very large corporate development teams, but there is almost no difference in responsibilities between the roles. For a handful of very large companies, they split corporate development into separate functions (sourcing/scouting, execution, and post-merger integration). You might have s 'senior director' head one of those functions, but a 'director' may do so instead. Or your firm may do full life-cycle deals, and want someone who can oversee the whole process. This is much more typical at Fortune 51-500 firms than in the Fortune 50.

I explain all this so you understand that roles and responsibilities in corporate development at large corporations can vary widely. Some firms use the term 'corporate development' to specifically mean M&A. Some mean a combination of M&A and strategy. And some even include certain aspects of business development (like large partnerships & alliances) or venture investing in their 'corp dev' teams. The scope of the role matters a great deal in determining compensation. Location matters a great deal. The structure of the team matters a great deal. And the preexisting compensation structure for other corporate officers at the same level also matters A GREAT DEAL.

A lot of firms that don't have large corporate development teams or perhaps have 1-2 people running deals for them (companies in the $1B-$5B enterprise value range who don't do a lot of M&A) may simply have their existing staff on some bullshit HR-crafted comp structure that the firm uses for all executives within certain pay bands. It's the responsibility of the Head of Corporate Development to make sure his people are paid outside the normal pay structure the company uses for other types of jobs within the firm or you'll never attract good people.

Given all that, a 'director' can make between $170k-$250k base + 20%-50% cash bonus + 30k-50k RSUs. I've seen higher cash bonus structures and higher stock grants, but these are the figures you more typically see. VPs can expect $200k-$300k base + 20-50% cash bonus + 50k-100k RSUs. And the Head of Corp Dev at a Fortune 100 company can make a great deal more than that.

As I said, the numbers are highly variable and noticeably higher in the US than in the UK or the rest of Europe. Just another reason among many to not work in Europe if you have other options.


One other key thing I'd like to add to explain why the numbers become a lot more variable at higher levels within corp dev:

While companies might hire a few analysts every year and an associate or two every couple of years, they're not hiring that many directors or VPs within corporate development. A company might go years between hiring a new director. And they may have been an internal promote the last time. Or the firm may not have revised its comp structure in a long time. Or they might never have hired a director in corp dev. I interviewed for a director position at a fast-growing tech firm a few years ago, and they had absolutely no idea what the comp package should look like. The recruiter admitted that she had never recruited for a corp dev role before, and that it was a new function for the firm. Basically, they were guessing, and they were wildly off-market.

As a rule, corporate recruiters aren't especially bright, but when it comes to corp dev roles, they're completely fucking useless. Unfortunately, it's a bit self-serving to allow corp dev set their own compensation plans, so HR gets involved and cocks-up the whole system. This same nonsense occurs at endowments attached to hospitals and universities for a similar reason. HR doesn't know what to do with one-off or rare positions.


Harum blanditiis id facilis quasi eligendi tempore. Rerum amet enim id sequi dolore aliquid. Qui quo tempora molestias aut culpa ea. Sequi dolorem dolorem magni est aspernatur. Rerum dignissimos ex dolor sapiente delectus ab cum. Error possimus suscipit qui quia. Aut temporibus iusto deserunt qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”


From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”