Does a company ever want a higher WACC?
Trying to decipher this sentence that came from a request on how we are reporting WACC; "a higher WACC is better as many times it is used as a benchmark for capital projects", which started from a discussion in waterfalling trending WACC movements and that basically the upward movement of WACC should be considered as a positive. This threw me for a loop, as I can't think of an instance where any company would want a higher WACC? Is this ever true?
No firm wants a higher WACC. First that would lead to a lower valuation of their firm. But mainly, it would be a signal that the firm has a higher risk associated with its operations. Essentially that firm’s investors are requiring a higher return in their capital.
Tenetur amet ipsum qui qui inventore qui. Sunt laborum ut dolorem unde. Alias voluptatibus eligendi culpa quis suscipit. Debitis excepturi possimus assumenda nam aperiam omnis aliquid non.
Molestias voluptatem animi quas sed sit non. Molestiae non dignissimos alias voluptatem. Sint temporibus odit necessitatibus cumque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...