Goldman Sachs Private Credit (Direct Lending vs. Hybrid Capital)
Hi everyone, I’m trying to get a clearer picture of how Goldman’s Private Credit platform is set up and was hoping someone here might have some insight.
From what I understand, GSAM splits the private credit investment team into a few buckets (Direct Lending, Hybrid Capital, Asset Finance, IG Private Credit, etc.). I’m mainly curious about the differences between Direct Lending and Hybrid Capital since the lines between the two aren’t totally obvious from the outside. Does the Direct Lending team stick pretty strictly to senior secured/unitranche deals, or do they also play in the junior parts of the stack? And if they do go below senior, how is that different from what the Hybrid Capital team does? Is the split based on where the paper sits in the capital structure, or is it more about the type of situation (sponsor vs unsponsored, complexity, deal profile, return target, etc.)?
If anyone has worked with or around the platform and can share how deals get allocated between the two teams or how the mandates differ in practice, would really appreciate it.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of Goldman Sachs' Private Credit platform and the distinctions between Direct Lending and Hybrid Capital:
Direct Lending:
Hybrid Capital:
Key Differences:
If you're considering a role or partnership with either team, understanding these distinctions can help clarify their mandates and investment strategies. Let me know if you'd like further insights!
Sources: Private Debt/Direct Lending Exit Opps?, Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Thoughts on Goldman vs Lending Club, Direct Lending --> Distressed/Special Situations Investing
Bump
its pretty diff in US v UK and they hire alot more for UK
Hybrid has definitely seen better days compared to pre volcker SSG. they now mostly do holdco/mezz for sponsors, growth/minority equity and rescue/acquisition financing. from my own interactions, this group is seen as more prestigious in UK compared to US where it has less dealflow
DL mostly does 1L secured with some exceptions. sweaty asf in UK since they do their own portfolio monitoring. comp is not great when compared to other big shops. less sweaty and imo seems more interesting in US. they have workout + portfolio management team in the US so the juniors are probably able to do more pertinent work
Non ut exercitationem eos corrupti eos non itaque. Eos dicta error qui sed dolores fuga consequuntur. Possimus sit alias suscipit nesciunt ut in labore. Aut consequatur porro praesentium natus ea. Molestiae possimus qui corrupti sunt sit. Est quia aut nihil in qui blanditiis inventore. Fugit sint dolores et sed id accusantium eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...