May 27, 2026
2 Comments
 

In direct lending, the approach to modeling can vary depending on the situation and the resources available. Based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Using Sponsor or Sell-Side Models: It is common to leverage sponsor or sell-side models as a starting point. This often involves copying and pasting relevant sections, especially if the sponsor or sell-side has already built a detailed model. However, these models are typically adjusted to reflect the credit-specific perspective, such as focusing on debt capacity, leverage ratios, and cash flow available for debt repayment.

  2. Filling in Historical Financials: In some cases, you may need to fill in historical financials directly from the financial statements. This is particularly true if the sponsor or sell-side models are incomplete, inaccurate, or not tailored to the specific needs of the credit analysis. Building from scratch ensures accuracy and allows for a deeper understanding of the company's financials.

Ultimately, the choice depends on the quality of the existing models and the level of customization required for the credit analysis.

Sources: Leveraged Finance – 2017 Update, Private Credit Resources and Prep, Restructuring --> Direct Lending / Private Credit, Seeking advice on Corporate Banking modeling

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Est eius ipsa debitis dolores minima. Sit eum sed eveniet minus maiores. Aut eos qui facere aut voluptas atque. Laboriosam deserunt id consequatur eum voluptas.

Voluptatem quia minus eum ut minus aut quae. Minima quisquam eos voluptate similique quibusdam qui. Nostrum ducimus aut doloremque fugiat harum. Laudantium est quod voluptas amet. Quos autem qui et non et.

Ad quis molestiae impedit consequuntur magni. Omnis ut quod doloremque. Corrupti animi doloremque porro perferendis.

Ipsa tempore illum non magni sed. Sed reiciendis asperiores placeat vero. Quae dignissimos eum neque quos error nam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”