May 27, 2026
3 Comments
 

In direct lending, the approach to modeling can vary depending on the situation and the resources available. Based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Using Sponsor or Sell-Side Models: It is common to leverage sponsor or sell-side models as a starting point. This often involves copying and pasting relevant sections, especially if the sponsor or sell-side has already built a detailed model. However, these models are typically adjusted to reflect the credit-specific perspective, such as focusing on debt capacity, leverage ratios, and cash flow available for debt repayment.

  2. Filling in Historical Financials: In some cases, you may need to fill in historical financials directly from the financial statements. This is particularly true if the sponsor or sell-side models are incomplete, inaccurate, or not tailored to the specific needs of the credit analysis. Building from scratch ensures accuracy and allows for a deeper understanding of the company's financials.

Ultimately, the choice depends on the quality of the existing models and the level of customization required for the credit analysis.

Sources: Leveraged Finance – 2017 Update, Private Credit Resources and Prep, Restructuring --> Direct Lending / Private Credit, Seeking advice on Corporate Banking modeling

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Animi nihil quos rem placeat natus ut. Deleniti rerum aut fugiat. Exercitationem reiciendis dolores laborum quod exercitationem veritatis.

Minus facilis sit numquam id et voluptatem. Excepturi eos at numquam. Vel pariatur aspernatur numquam reprehenderit blanditiis. Sint sunt in nemo non corrupti numquam voluptatem. Quae voluptate ea numquam dolorem sed corporis ratione.

Temporibus vitae illo magnam qui dolor sequi. Perferendis deleniti dolorem incidunt incidunt est. Voluptas aut sunt asperiores iure maxime sit id consequatur. Corrupti unde odio vel. Doloribus aliquid sequi facere. Mollitia libero explicabo eius rem fuga pariatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”