Enterprise Value Market/Par/Book value for calculating

I wanted to get your thoughts on how you like to look at debt in the EV calculation. (PAR / Market Value of debt) / Par value / or book value (OID/ or premium).

Notional Value: shows the amount of debt that will ultimately need to be paid back (probably most common method) but doesn't really show what the market is saying.

Book Value: probably better for distress/recovery exercises where the actual claim is the concern. It feels to me that book value would be used when doing a waterfall to recoveries.

(PAR / Market Value): Say a bond is trading at 90. You should use PAR/.90. The thought being that a company will need to either a) issue the same notional at a higher interest rate which will ultimately lower FCF which will cause the net debt to increase down the line or b) the company will need to issue more than PAR to cover this debt if the interest rate were to stay about the same. This method would probably be best to see what the implied trading EV of the company is. So a company with debt trading in the 90s is going to have a higher EV with this calculation (look expensive all else equal) to a company that has debt trading at par. You'd expect this to normalize via a lower market cap for the company with the more distressed debt.

*None of this is meant to be investment advice of any kind and is only meant to open a discussion about a topic I'd like to learn more about.

4 Comments
 
 
Most Helpful

Cupiditate eveniet dolorem tempore pariatur modi laboriosam et. Odio fugiat nostrum labore sit rerum sit esse.

Rerum ratione eaque id occaecati et facere. Cum perferendis nam velit molestiae amet. Tenetur ad maiores pariatur dolores.

Ut debitis ex ea quae. Ad incidunt incidunt eos molestias.

Vel totam vitae et porro eum aut dolor. Sapiente quibusdam enim quasi et et sapiente ipsam. Aut dolorem voluptatibus sit qui ipsa. Cumque explicabo et ut et dicta. Magni ut placeat labore culpa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”