The true purpose of calculating Enterprise Value

Hi guys,

Some sources call EV the "price that an acquirer really pays''. But in reality the purchase price is always the stock price plus certain premium. Does it mean that EV is just a 'theoretical price' for the business? If so why do we go through all the trouble gauging a company's EV, especially in an M&A transaction?

Thanks!

 

You need it for ratios such as EV/EBIT and EV/EBITDA. You need both the denominator and numerator to reflect the same thing (which is the case here, since both EV and EBITDA are capital structure neutral).

 

You calculate EV to support your argument. Remember - IB valuation isn't really about "valuing" a company. It's about helping a client achieve the best transcriptional outcome.

So if you are advising a target, you might want to use an EV/EBITDA comparison (among other "valuation" "methodologies") with other companies to support your case that your client is undervalued by the market, and thus the buyer should pay a higher premium over the current stock price.

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 
uoft2013:
Hi guys,

Some sources call EV the "price that an acquirer really pays''. But in reality the purchase price is always the stock price plus certain premium. Does it mean that EV is just a 'theoretical price' for the business? If so why do we go through all the trouble gauging a company's EV, especially in an M&A transaction?

Thanks!

My fault if its already been answered, but OP..here is an example:

First - you're correct on the purchase price. Its the market price, plus a "control premium" to acquire all of the equity in a company.

However, when that happens, you consolidate the target onto your balance sheet and (usually) assume all debt and cash.

So, the example:

If you buy your friend, for $100 (say, paid to his parents), but he has $20 in his pocket, your true out of pocket cost is actually $80...the enterprise value".

However, if your friend also has $50 in debt, along with the $20 in equity, you're now assuming all of that debt as well and the EV goes from $80 to $130. YOU'RE the one now responsible to pay for the interest on that debt, and the principal at maturity...it is now your property, along with the stock and cash.

So the use in EV is to show the company if the entirety is to be acquired. If you wanted to buy one stock in Facebook, you'd be paying the market price b/c you're simply acquiring part of the equity. However, when Google decides it wants to own ALL of Facebook, it has to account for that other stuff (the outstnding debt and cash-on-hand) as well.

 
Best Response
uoft2013:
Hi guys,

But in reality the purchase price is always the stock price plus certain premium.

This is where you are going awry. The purchase price of the EQUITY in a business is the stock price (plus a premium), not the purchase price of the whole business. You still have to deal with the business' creditors, or you won't own the company.

Easiest way to think about it: Say John Doe buys $100 of assets. To pay for them, he borrows $60 from the bank (debt), and pays $40 out of his own pocket (equity). Say you come along and want to own John's assets for the same price he paid ($100). To do so, you have to pay two people: (i) $40 to John and (ii) $60 to the bank. The $40 to John is analogous to the price per share you see in public M&A deals, and the $60 is analogous to the amount paid to re-finance or roll whatever debt is on the business. Together, they comprise the total value of the assets, or the enterprise value.

 

Aspernatur quas neque quo dicta. Ipsum ipsum beatae eligendi deserunt consequatur. Non repellendus quod suscipit voluptas et nostrum. Quos quidem dolor quibusdam quo totam qui saepe.

Laudantium non ipsa est adipisci. Sint eius voluptatem et id placeat accusamus impedit. Inventore quo vel reiciendis assumenda illo. Assumenda ullam id rem fugiat sunt provident.

Similique soluta doloribus sint voluptatem. Autem ut sint similique perspiciatis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”