Grocery Store stocks: why are P/E ratios so high?

I want to create 3 statement, comparable company, and DCF models for a well known grocery store/supermarket chain. My ultimate goal is to use the analysis to create a solid stock pitch for interviews. I've identified a few stocks that analysts are bullish on, but they all have high P/E ratios: Harris Teeter (19.62), Kroger (21.08), Whole Foods (42.44), Fresh Market (46.43).

How can analysts be bullish on stocks with P/E ratios above 40? I'm leaning towards either Kroger or Harris Teeter--will I have a hard time pitching the stock to an interviewer if the P/E is above 20 or is this standard for the industry?

15 Comments
 
Best Response

Companies like Whole Foods provide more opportunity to grow versus companies like Kroger. There is a reason why the market assigns them a low P/E because they are dog shit compared to their competitors. You should think of these stocks from a timing point of view rather then buy and hold. Where is the best opportunity to enter this stock and where should I exit. You might think its "safer" to invest in a low P/E stock but you still have the same chance of loosing money. Don't be afraid of high P/E simply because it is high. Look at it from a forward basis using your own estimates and you'll might discover its actually trading at a discount to expectations.

 
bearingCompanies like Whole Foods provide more opportunity to grow versus companies like Kroger. There is a reason why the market assigns them a low P/E because they are dog shit compared to their competitors.

Could you please expand on this a little more?

 
GS
bearingCompanies like Whole Foods provide more opportunity to grow versus companies like Kroger. There is a reason why the market assigns them a low P/E because they are dog shit compared to their competitors.

Could you please expand on this a little more?

I don't follow the supermarket industry but I see P/E as the grade the market assigns to a company. On relative terms, if the companies are comparable then there is a reason that the company is trading at a lower multiple to its competitors. My natural assumption is that the company has either lower growth opportunities, poorly run etc, since something must be depressing those expectations. Ovechkin is correct that P/E is grounded on fundamentals but it's OP job to look at that. High P/E should not dissuade you from investing in a stock. It's a lazy call and precludes you from many money making opportunities.
 

You can pitch any one of the stocks you mentioned and make a strong impression, as long as your reasoning is sound and the interviewer can understand your thought process.

For example, you could pitch Kroger as a well-established pure-play (although they're diversifying away from that now) in the grocery space with consistently growing comp store sales. Or you could pitch Whole Foods as the leader in a rapidly-growing natural foods grocery store segment, with expected comp store sales growth and potential for increased top line growth through the opening of new stores in the future. As long as your assumptions make sense to the interviewer and they justify the valuation, then a high P/E probably isn't going to get you in trouble.

 
pdxshortsellerYou can pitch any one of the stocks you mentioned and make a strong impression, as long as your reasoning is sound and the interviewer can understand your thought process.

For example, you could pitch Kroger as a well-established pure-play (although they're diversifying away from that now) in the grocery space with consistently growing comp store sales. Or you could pitch Whole Foods as the leader in a rapidly-growing natural foods grocery store segment, with expected comp store sales growth and potential for increased top line growth through the opening of new stores in the future. As long as your assumptions make sense to the interviewer and they justify the valuation, then a high P/E probably isn't going to get you in trouble.

Thanks--this is helpful

 

TESCO: world's third largest food retailer trading with a P/E of 8.5x WMT: world's largest retailer and dominant food retailer trading with a P/E of 15.61

There are cheap food retailers out there...

 

Read up on justified P/E multiples. All multiples are based on fundamentals, something that a lot of relative value players seem to ignore.

 

I think you should calculate the betas of the companies and then you could look at the WACC. Supermarkets generally have a very low beta because they usually have stable CF and aren't cyclical like a lot of other industries are. The fact that the beta is so low = WACC that will be low. This leads to a higher P/E

 

P/E is a borderline useless metric because it ignores capital structure. A highly levered company will often look "cheap" while a totally unlevered or net cash company will look expensive according to P/E. Also, with retailers especially, you need to consider whether the retailer is leasing its stores or owns them. A retailer that owns its stores will again look expensive according to P/E, while a retailer that leases everything looks cheap.

 

Laboriosam iste odio architecto optio perferendis commodi. Qui quibusdam aperiam voluptatem sed officiis. Repudiandae ipsum est quia quaerat. Ipsam minima libero sint architecto. Debitis consequatur dolore quas quo quo. Minima ipsum fuga ex ab voluptatem id et.

Illum dolore debitis quam qui sed sunt. Quia sequi totam alias rem fugit.

Quae in sunt doloremque et quia ea necessitatibus. Non omnis assumenda quia vel laudantium aut et. Non mollitia corrupti dolorem deleniti voluptatibus. Accusantium sed dolorem odio delectus. Veniam non et voluptatem animi necessitatibus quae. Non eos voluptas deserunt distinctio velit expedita.

Eveniet recusandae quia labore. Placeat aut et ex. Enim aperiam sed harum exercitationem nemo recusandae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”