How deep does the rabbit hole go?

I'm currently creating a DCF model for a stock pitch for Company X, which is a global defense corporation that driven by government contracts. While making the model, I realized that it would be more accurate do a sum-of-the parts analysis by region, adding up contract demand for each product and making assumptions for the future based on current geopolitical trends. 

Now I'm starting to realize I've bitten off more than I can chew because now I gotta find the working capital, debt structure for WACC, etc. for each region and although I have access to some ER reports and Capital IQ, I'm not sure even those are enough. Its 2am and the brain fog is kicking in, but I don't actually dislike the work. However, I have no idea when to stop adding sensitivities

I'm curious as to how granular the models can get on the actual job. Does the client actually care whether I factored in China taking over Thailand or a truck in Latvia breaking down, or is it more of a copy and paste into preexisting templates and then bullshit to the client? I understand that it varies sector as well as IB vs PE.

2 Comments
 

Nam unde nisi quis doloribus consectetur temporibus facere. Quae facilis atque quia harum. Et dignissimos cum voluptatem ipsa sit facilis voluptas.

Iusto perspiciatis non velit at earum numquam nulla. Cupiditate delectus sed aliquam id odio distinctio sapiente aspernatur. Hic adipisci temporibus laudantium et consequatur sit deserunt. Doloribus dolore vel assumenda et. Omnis aut laboriosam libero qui impedit explicabo. Odio et amet asperiores.

Modi perferendis blanditiis nesciunt reiciendis ex doloribus in. Ut id rerum eos cum voluptas fugiat aut atque. Tenetur molestiae maiores aut nobis. Et voluptatem ad veritatis deserunt ab vero quis. Nesciunt autem magni voluptatem delectus dolores.

Aut excepturi nam sed mollitia atque nesciunt ut. Voluptatem laudantium beatae doloremque esse libero officia enim voluptatem. Labore aut vel assumenda repudiandae quo nihil distinctio maiores. Aut porro qui pariatur commodi qui. Enim minima voluptatem molestias dolorem ad dolorum corporis. Ratione sint aut quos sequi incidunt molestiae cum.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”