How to evaluate a health insurers financials?

Sorry if this is the wrong place for something like this but I was hoping one of you ER guys could help me out. 
 

im in a class competition and long story short I need to provide analysis on a few of the public health insurers. One thing I wanted to get some clarification on is how much of a health insurers balance sheet is locked up for regulatory requirements. I had been reading, and saw that most insurers have to keep a large % of their cash and investments available to be used for potential future losses. Does anyone know what that % usually is? Are there other requirements that insurers have to play by regarding their balance sheet?

thanks!

3 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, evaluating a health insurer's financials involves understanding their regulatory requirements and balance sheet structure. Here's a breakdown:

  1. Regulatory Requirements:

    • Health insurers, like other insurers, are subject to Risk-Based Capital (RBC) requirements. The RBC ratio is calculated as Total Adjusted Capital (TAC) / RBC. A ratio above 200% is considered good, while anything below 150% is concerning. If it drops below 70%, state regulators may intervene unless corrected within 90 days.
    • Insurers must maintain a significant portion of their cash and investments to cover potential future losses. This is similar to banks holding reserves for solvency purposes.
  2. Balance Sheet Considerations:

    • Statutory Accounting: Insurers use statutory accounting, which focuses on cash received from premiums and payouts for claims. This ensures they have enough liquidity to meet future obligations.
    • Unearned Premium Reserve: Insurers create a liability for premiums received upfront for multi-year policies. This reserve decreases over time as the premiums are earned.
    • Deferred Acquisition Costs (DAC): These represent expenses for acquiring new policies, spread over the policy's life.
  3. Key Ratios to Evaluate:

    • Solvency Ratio: Calculated as Capital & Surplus (C&S) / Net Written Premiums (NWP). A higher ratio is safer, typically around 70%, with a minimum of 10-20% depending on the regulator.
    • Loss & LAE Ratio: Measures losses and loss adjustment expenses relative to net earned premiums (NEP). Lower is better, typically ranging between 50-75%.
    • Expense Ratio: Total expenses (commissions + underwriting) divided by NEP. Lower is better, usually around 25%.
    • Combined Ratio: Sum of Loss Ratio and Expense Ratio. A ratio below 90% is rare, while 90-110% is typical.
  4. Investment Income:

    • Health insurers generate income from their investments. A higher Investment Income / Total Value of Cash and Investments ratio indicates better utilization of funds.

For more detailed insights, you can explore the WSO thread on FIG (Financial Institutions Group) analysis here: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/working-in-fig…</a">Working in FIG - An Overview.

Sources: Working in FIG (Financial Institutions Group) - An Overview., Working in FIG (Financial Institutions Group) - An Overview., 20 balance sheet ratios every investor should be aware of, A Banking Primer, How to tell if a bank will fail?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Quia et repudiandae dolorum beatae. Autem sint similique maxime provident. Omnis ut aut cumque aut.

Eos aut vitae totam alias. Aut iure porro ut ut exercitationem sit. Corrupti suscipit enim quod voluptate omnis molestiae molestias temporibus. Voluptates quos rerum eaque quasi a fugit perspiciatis.

Rerum est excepturi ab eaque harum consequatur. Perspiciatis mollitia qui nemo.

Ad sunt quia et ipsam unde ducimus. Autem et officiis repudiandae est ab. Qui ea sequi nihil autem dolorem. Repellendus assumenda sit soluta qui. Voluptatem mollitia enim temporibus eos in. Et sequi sit vel eligendi. Qui cumque similique explicabo nam provident et deserunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”