How to evaluate a health insurers financials?

Sorry if this is the wrong place for something like this but I was hoping one of you ER guys could help me out. 
 

im in a class competition and long story short I need to provide analysis on a few of the public health insurers. One thing I wanted to get some clarification on is how much of a health insurers balance sheet is locked up for regulatory requirements. I had been reading, and saw that most insurers have to keep a large % of their cash and investments available to be used for potential future losses. Does anyone know what that % usually is? Are there other requirements that insurers have to play by regarding their balance sheet?

thanks!

3 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, evaluating a health insurer's financials involves understanding their regulatory requirements and balance sheet structure. Here's a breakdown:

  1. Regulatory Requirements:

    • Health insurers, like other insurers, are subject to Risk-Based Capital (RBC) requirements. The RBC ratio is calculated as Total Adjusted Capital (TAC) / RBC. A ratio above 200% is considered good, while anything below 150% is concerning. If it drops below 70%, state regulators may intervene unless corrected within 90 days.
    • Insurers must maintain a significant portion of their cash and investments to cover potential future losses. This is similar to banks holding reserves for solvency purposes.
  2. Balance Sheet Considerations:

    • Statutory Accounting: Insurers use statutory accounting, which focuses on cash received from premiums and payouts for claims. This ensures they have enough liquidity to meet future obligations.
    • Unearned Premium Reserve: Insurers create a liability for premiums received upfront for multi-year policies. This reserve decreases over time as the premiums are earned.
    • Deferred Acquisition Costs (DAC): These represent expenses for acquiring new policies, spread over the policy's life.
  3. Key Ratios to Evaluate:

    • Solvency Ratio: Calculated as Capital & Surplus (C&S) / Net Written Premiums (NWP). A higher ratio is safer, typically around 70%, with a minimum of 10-20% depending on the regulator.
    • Loss & LAE Ratio: Measures losses and loss adjustment expenses relative to net earned premiums (NEP). Lower is better, typically ranging between 50-75%.
    • Expense Ratio: Total expenses (commissions + underwriting) divided by NEP. Lower is better, usually around 25%.
    • Combined Ratio: Sum of Loss Ratio and Expense Ratio. A ratio below 90% is rare, while 90-110% is typical.
  4. Investment Income:

    • Health insurers generate income from their investments. A higher Investment Income / Total Value of Cash and Investments ratio indicates better utilization of funds.

For more detailed insights, you can explore the WSO thread on FIG (Financial Institutions Group) analysis here: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/working-in-fig…</a">Working in FIG - An Overview.

Sources: Working in FIG (Financial Institutions Group) - An Overview., Working in FIG (Financial Institutions Group) - An Overview., 20 balance sheet ratios every investor should be aware of, A Banking Primer, How to tell if a bank will fail?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Alias ratione quis harum mollitia consequatur voluptatem. Debitis beatae molestias modi. Quia omnis nobis quos facilis iure vel non. Odit voluptate atque repellendus nostrum soluta. Est est qui expedita molestiae architecto.

Necessitatibus nulla velit et labore facilis. Aut officiis quis saepe id.

Cumque eveniet possimus et a ab tempora doloremque. Eos ducimus accusamus explicabo voluptas tenetur esse. Veniam ab ullam et et perferendis rem. Ut dicta possimus consequatur consequatur amet rerum sunt. Provident sunt iusto beatae. Accusamus inventore dignissimos et aut.

Dolorem dolore quia suscipit quibusdam non. Unde minima et odio culpa. Quo et quos tenetur ducimus. Excepturi ducimus error et. Ut eum cum sed minima itaque. Ipsa officiis voluptatum omnis perspiciatis. Rem ut laborum illo occaecati blanditiis id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”