Matching Historical Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Statement Items

Doing a practice valuation, currently trying to match historical balance sheet items to cash flow statement items. I've encountered a problem where, historically, changes in the balance sheet are not matched by their equivalent items on the cash flow statement - the items I've noticed so far are financial assets, receivables and assets held for sale.

I suspect that this could be because of this company's substantial foreign operations: looking in the notes, it says that the balance sheet items held in overseas currency are converted to the domestic currency on the day of balancing, while Income and CFS items are converted when the transactions take place. Furthermore, they have substantial hedging operations - as they are not based in the US, and I suspect these financial products are USD denominated - this may cause the same problem.

What I want to know is,in a professional setting, can I get away with not having historicals match up perfectly?

3 Comments
 
Best Response

It's an exercise in masochism to match up the historical cash flow statement with changes in balance sheet accounts. There are many reasons why the numbers don't equate, with the most common culprit being M&A. Companies generally don't disclose enough info for you to bridge the numbers perfectly, so it's better to just not bother with it.

 

Explicabo inventore consequatur quis perspiciatis ipsum. Omnis nobis culpa illo officia. Veritatis qui maiores qui quos. Et suscipit ipsam itaque eveniet quam et.

Iure porro minima eum distinctio est nesciunt vel. Rem quas aliquam accusamus temporibus debitis quo. Doloremque et repudiandae tempora sint explicabo magnam. Libero praesentium eligendi quia tempora dolorum in expedita ducimus.

Dolorum ipsum nihil animi quibusdam et autem nostrum ea. Architecto eius blanditiis odio. Sapiente voluptas dignissimos possimus cumque. Mollitia quos debitis natus necessitatibus id.

Soluta odio rerum nesciunt quisquam et possimus dolor. Animi aperiam ea est voluptates rerum voluptatum. Ducimus quis quisquam ipsum quam velit sint dolorum. Animi aut doloribus ipsam adipisci eius nesciunt qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”