Natural Gas vs. Coal Plants

Hey Guys, For my internship I'm working on a research project examining natural gas vs. coal power plants. For anyone here working with energy I've noticed that heating value added for natural gas is measured in btu/ft^3 and heating value added for coal is measured in btu/ton. When I make the conversion from btu/ft^3 to btu/ton using some assumptions about specific gravity I get that natural gas has a much higher heating value added per ton. Does this make sense? Is it valid to make this calculation since I'm essentially comparing two substances in different states? Do you guys know of any good research done on coal vs. natural gas power plant efficiencies, cost, output, etc.

Thanks! gcjohns

4 Comments
 

It's not valid to do a weight-based comparison here because natural gas does not occur in solid form underground, costs far more to extract per "ton" and uses different equipment to burn it. Essentially, the only "common denominator" between the two are that both are carbon-based sources of energy when burned.

It really depends on what side you're looking at it from (whether from a cost-benefit analysis, or from an environmental side), but I would examine it like this:

  • $/btu
  • emissions/btu (hard to standardize - as the contents of the emissions are different)
  • $ fixed assets/btu over the life of the plant

Long story short, your normalizing factor should be btu - not weight.

 
Best Response

Yes natural gas has a much higher heating value than coal. However, for purposes of power plants instead of worrying about specific gravity and btu / ton or btu / ft^3, you should just focus on heat rate, which is the number of btus required to generate a kWh of electricity. The heat rate for combined cycle natural gas is in the 6,800 btu / kwh - 7,200 btu / kWh range, while coal usually comes in around 10,000 btu / kWh. Peaker (simple cycle) gas plants have a higher heat rate, closer to that of coal.

Best general (free) source for this kind of information is the EIA (http://www.eia.gov/). They have a ton of data and a lot of introductory material. If you have access to Wall Street research you can check any initiating coverage report for utilities and you'll probably also find some of this info.

 

Similique laboriosam quasi nihil repellat et. Inventore vitae inventore quia cum. Quia quo ex autem.

Excepturi accusamus velit esse inventore. Non est sit rerum voluptatem sit unde ex culpa.

Consectetur fugiat omnis qui ab sint. Omnis deserunt dolorum est optio. Aut ut sed et repellat quod veritatis omnis. Deleniti id omnis tenetur maxime consectetur consequuntur. Quidem libero quia repellendus. Enim ad eaque odio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”