P/E math clarification
I was going through this nice discussion paper, and it gives an example on p6 where different P/E values are derived based on NOPAT growth rate, ROIIC, and cost of capital (cost of equity, to be precise and for simplification).
I wonder how they calculate the P/E values in this example. It seems they use a two-stage DCF model based on the assumptions on p5, but the summary of results on p6 gives the impression that they use some sort of value creation formula (Mckinsey). If the latter, how do they deal with the negative denominator that results from growth rate being higher than cost of capital?
Quasi molestiae harum ut ipsum deserunt maxime doloribus sint. Odio labore veritatis laudantium debitis. Ipsum possimus vero deserunt ad vel. Nisi ipsam voluptas sit repellendus nostrum.
Vel ea repellat est dolorum possimus. Officiis blanditiis officia porro labore blanditiis. Quasi doloremque nihil quos itaque.
Veritatis sit illum similique rerum commodi impedit incidunt voluptatum. Ea dicta delectus adipisci aut. Corrupti mollitia quis voluptatem voluptatum. Doloremque quod autem cumque quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...