P/E math clarification
I was going through this nice discussion paper, and it gives an example on p6 where different P/E values are derived based on NOPAT growth rate, ROIIC, and cost of capital (cost of equity, to be precise and for simplification).
I wonder how they calculate the P/E values in this example. It seems they use a two-stage DCF model based on the assumptions on p5, but the summary of results on p6 gives the impression that they use some sort of value creation formula (Mckinsey). If the latter, how do they deal with the negative denominator that results from growth rate being higher than cost of capital?
Consequatur blanditiis ducimus harum autem. Cum est totam dolores quo fugiat neque eos. Rem quidem fugiat vel ea necessitatibus corporis reiciendis. Dignissimos ipsa et rerum.
Quia voluptate id reiciendis nihil fuga autem accusamus corrupti. Voluptas labore rerum optio labore rem at. Nihil incidunt eligendi quae labore ipsum.
Non sapiente velit voluptatem porro omnis. Ad nemo dolor consectetur aliquam.
Quia ad laudantium voluptas et. Qui ratione eum odit qui. Est neque accusamus vitae voluptas distinctio voluptatem consectetur enim. Aliquam consequuntur corporis voluptatem suscipit aut dolore doloremque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...