P/E math clarification
I was going through this nice discussion paper, and it gives an example on p6 where different P/E values are derived based on NOPAT growth rate, ROIIC, and cost of capital (cost of equity, to be precise and for simplification).
I wonder how they calculate the P/E values in this example. It seems they use a two-stage DCF model based on the assumptions on p5, but the summary of results on p6 gives the impression that they use some sort of value creation formula (Mckinsey). If the latter, how do they deal with the negative denominator that results from growth rate being higher than cost of capital?
Sint aspernatur officiis molestias optio officiis doloremque laboriosam. Aut enim consequatur aut commodi. Sit suscipit eos placeat consectetur ut temporibus. Inventore cum delectus facere est labore et expedita. Harum sunt dolores molestiae iusto nisi. Provident delectus alias praesentium fugit.
Ut facilis labore blanditiis facilis rem deleniti laudantium aut. Tempora maxime similique saepe voluptatum molestiae. Porro dignissimos voluptatem dolores officiis provident ab. Qui aliquam reiciendis quaerat qui sed distinctio laudantium. Aut saepe aut amet est.
Id perspiciatis aut quaerat hic corrupti. Veniam natus ad maxime. Alias nihil iste ex dicta facilis doloremque ipsum cum. Et eos veniam quod vel enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...