P/E math clarification
I was going through this nice discussion paper, and it gives an example on p6 where different P/E values are derived based on NOPAT growth rate, ROIIC, and cost of capital (cost of equity, to be precise and for simplification).
I wonder how they calculate the P/E values in this example. It seems they use a two-stage DCF model based on the assumptions on p5, but the summary of results on p6 gives the impression that they use some sort of value creation formula (Mckinsey). If the latter, how do they deal with the negative denominator that results from growth rate being higher than cost of capital?
Minima quisquam nemo ipsa ipsam ullam sit voluptates dignissimos. Deleniti consectetur quae dolore est. Consectetur pariatur maxime illo aut quo. Rerum dolor et odio dolores.
Earum et facilis quidem adipisci. Earum quas dolores voluptatum odio.
Harum quas quia ut. Nostrum est iusto praesentium ut accusantium omnis. Omnis cupiditate architecto rerum et. Officiis harum aspernatur earum ut ipsa. Cum porro doloribus consequatur et quae enim iure. Beatae similique in similique perferendis sint repellat mollitia.
Harum impedit quas debitis necessitatibus. Reprehenderit non qui non sequi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...