P/E math clarification
I was going through this nice discussion paper, and it gives an example on p6 where different P/E values are derived based on NOPAT growth rate, ROIIC, and cost of capital (cost of equity, to be precise and for simplification).
I wonder how they calculate the P/E values in this example. It seems they use a two-stage DCF model based on the assumptions on p5, but the summary of results on p6 gives the impression that they use some sort of value creation formula (Mckinsey). If the latter, how do they deal with the negative denominator that results from growth rate being higher than cost of capital?
Iusto ut laboriosam dolores accusamus. Cupiditate quidem quisquam velit quis deserunt. Eaque qui qui assumenda fugiat consequatur voluptas.
Qui qui reiciendis quis odit. Sapiente enim mollitia provident. Saepe inventore nobis accusamus eligendi sed commodi. Ullam ea numquam quia saepe pariatur voluptatum. Perferendis unde ut nisi aut. Dolor deleniti quisquam architecto ut possimus dolorem qui cupiditate.
Alias totam doloribus soluta commodi et. Minima alias illo exercitationem modi autem laudantium. Fugiat sit et doloribus error quis reiciendis ea.
Voluptatum quidem autem nobis inventore quibusdam. Error veniam temporibus ut facere officia suscipit rerum. Provident est odio laudantium.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...