Why a 3 statement model?

Could someone explain why we need to built a fully fleshed out 3 statement model instead of a DCF model with working capital, capex, d&a and some revenue projections?

I'm trying to understand what the three statement model serves and why it is preferred over a partial model.

I appreciate the help.

5 Comments
 

Granularity. What do you need for a DCF? Cash flows. How do you get them? Depending on your method, you might need Net Income, a tax rate, Depreciation, and working capital. How do you get those? Balance sheet, income statement.

Could you just smack x-% growth onto this year's numbers and project from that? Sure. Will it be as useful? I think you can answer that by now.

in it 2 win it
 

As well, if you're including an lbo model, you should spread credit statistics to ensure the target does not breach hypothetical covenants.

It's not that hard, too.

My posts will be fraught with grammatical errors since I post from my phone. I will try my best not to post an incoherent babble.
 

A balance sheet is just the accrual / recognition of past and future cash flows presented in a nice format. You're right it isn't necessary, but doing a full model is easier than doing practically half a BS (always like how balance sheet looks like bull shit) anyway when looking for certain metrics.

To the above comment about where you get WC from, historically the cash flow / BS. But your model is your input. You don't "get" those figures from there, but that's where our inputs are represented.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Two other possible reasons: one is the appearance of substance and another is a perceived sense of accuracy. Seriously, though, looking at things from a cookie cutter perspective, whether you do a simple model or a more detailed model, should really depend on the underlying company you are valuing. There are some companies with more stable inputs in which a simpler model can capture well. However, there are companies with weird issues in which more details are necessary.

 

Qui quos blanditiis eius quibusdam. Dolor voluptatem exercitationem voluptatem dolorum. Ex voluptas molestias quia accusantium consequatur velit non. Deleniti repudiandae quo aut saepe velit facere. Iste eos enim sunt dignissimos corporis rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”