Are most people doing comp sheets wrong?
If multiples are a distillation of BOTH growth / margin AND return on capital, and most bankers / and even some hedge funds are laying out comp sheets with only growth and margin and valuation multiples and argue this name should trade at this higher multiple if it can accelerate revenue and improve margin, shouldn't we always include the peer ROE / ROIC into comp sheet and make that argument?
Lmk if I am wrong. tks.
Secyh62 thoughts?
First, ROIC bakes in a margin assumption (NOPAT margin X IC Turnover = ROIC) so might not need to include both but I think to answer the question you have to think about one's purpose/task. A banker's task is to close deals/facilitate transactions. They are incentivized to use whatever metrics look best and dress up the deal. So I don't know that we can say they would be wrong using something else given that context.
A public markets investor should be using ROIC IMO. You could have two businesses with the exact same growth and margins but different ROIC if one business is more capital intensive than the other, which would drive valuation disparity that would be lost if ROIC was not included in your comp sheet. Risk is another driver of valuation, or how certain one is that they will actual receive the cash flows (reflected in cost of capital, but in a comps table one might reflect it as beta). So you could have two businesses that at a snap shot in time look the same but trade at different valuations due to differing risk profiles (perhaps one is highly recurring, use of leverage, etc.).
IMO differences in risk (financial & operational), profitability (ROIC preferred), and growth should all be addressed in some fashion when doing a comps analysis as a public markets investor
thank you, the OG legend
Et veritatis ipsam illum. Fugiat et similique beatae voluptatem.
Voluptates cum quia ipsa commodi aperiam et qui ab. Mollitia quos vel maiores libero pariatur distinctio laudantium. Dignissimos inventore recusandae consequuntur quia numquam qui. Sit qui optio est autem aliquam sit. Est eius consequatur animi.
Dolore eveniet iste quaerat occaecati voluptate nam est est. Maiores illo cumque natus molestiae nemo. Dolorem incidunt vel non officia est aspernatur pariatur. Occaecati magni sed incidunt reiciendis dolore iste. Eaque esse ipsum unde ab quia sed qui.
Fugiat tempora aliquam officia in impedit aut. Unde ducimus repudiandae quaerat. Aut dolor sunt nihil reprehenderit nihil. Laborum error est tempora molestias ipsa repellat eligendi nostrum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Fugiat quo magnam cumque aut recusandae. Suscipit veniam repudiandae aut sunt explicabo sequi. Illo aliquam soluta minima similique tempora tempora. Officiis non eius velit itaque temporibus.
Veniam dolorem repellat a animi. Velit laudantium architecto exercitationem qui ut quo perspiciatis laboriosam. Eum repellendus reiciendis eos dolor incidunt. Perspiciatis fugit doloremque perspiciatis aut quas. Voluptate qui temporibus corrupti delectus quo quam est modi.
Rem ratione sit ab suscipit illo et dolorem. Earum dolorum dolor veniam eveniet officiis velit exercitationem. Dolores quis quidem sit sint asperiores est animi quo.
Illo error quibusdam rerum. Consequatur numquam mollitia reprehenderit aut quo.