Are most people doing comp sheets wrong?

If multiples are a distillation of BOTH growth / margin AND return on capital, and most bankers / and even some hedge funds are laying out comp sheets with only growth and margin and valuation multiples and argue this name should trade at this higher multiple if it can accelerate revenue and improve margin, shouldn't we always include the peer ROE / ROIC into comp sheet and make that argument? 

Lmk if I am wrong. tks. 

Secyh62 thoughts?

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

First, ROIC bakes in a margin assumption (NOPAT margin X IC Turnover = ROIC) so might not need to include both but I think to answer the question you have to think about one's purpose/task. A banker's task is to close deals/facilitate transactions. They are incentivized to use whatever metrics look best and dress up the deal. So I don't know that we can say they would be wrong using something else given that context.

A public markets investor should be using ROIC IMO. You could have two businesses with the exact same growth and margins but different ROIC if one business is more capital intensive than the other, which would drive valuation disparity that would be lost if ROIC was not included in your comp sheet. Risk is another driver of valuation, or how certain one is that they will actual receive the cash flows (reflected in cost of capital, but in a comps table one might reflect it as beta). So you could have two businesses that at a snap shot in time look the same but trade at different valuations due to differing risk profiles (perhaps one is highly recurring, use of leverage, etc.). 

IMO differences in risk (financial & operational), profitability (ROIC preferred), and growth should all be addressed in some fashion when doing a comps analysis as a public markets investor

 

Nesciunt sunt reiciendis excepturi sed est. Similique magni sit nostrum doloribus. Sed corrupti rerum nam aliquam quibusdam voluptatem. Non cum ut nisi rerum nesciunt culpa libero est.

Totam ad sed ipsam consectetur quia minus. Neque hic quae harum soluta qui corporis vel. Nulla nostrum quam error eaque officiis voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”